| Literature DB >> 32411531 |
Yongbin Li1, Qin Li1, Guohua Guan1, Sanfeng Chen1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Biological nitrogen fixation; Diazotrophic bacteria; Paenibacillus; Phosphate solubilizing bacteria; Wheat
Year: 2020 PMID: 32411531 PMCID: PMC7204819 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Wheat root length (A), shoot length (B), root dry weight (C) and shoot dry weight (D).
Values are given as mean of five independent biological replicates, and bearing different letters (a, b, c) are significantly different from each other according to the least significant difference (LSD) test (P < 0.05). The bars represent the standard error. CK, control treatment; B1, Inoculation with Paenibacillus sp. B1; BJ-18, Inoculation with P. beijingensis BJ-18; Mix, Inoculation with Paenibacillus sp. B1 and P. beijingensis BJ-18; BJ-18+P, Inoculation with P. beijingensis BJ-18 and application KH2PO4.
Figure 2Plant root total N (A), shoot total N (B), root total P (C) and shoot total P (D).
Values are given as mean of five independent biological replicates, and bearing different letters (a, b, c) are significantly different from each other according to the least significant difference (LSD) test (P < 0.05). The bars represent the standard error. CK, control treatment; B1, Inoculation with Paenibacillus sp. B1; BJ-18, Inoculation with P. beijingensis BJ-18, Mix: Inoculation with Paenibacillus sp. B1 and P. beijingensis BJ-18; BJ-18+P, Inoculation with P. beijingensis BJ-18 and application KH2PO4.
Wheat chlorophyl content (SPAD value).
| Treatments | SPAD value |
|---|---|
| CK | 28.4 ± 0.4c |
| B1 | 28.2 ± 0.6c |
| BJ-18 | 29.9 ± 0.6b |
| Mix | 32.4 ± 0.3a |
| BJ-18+P | 32.1 ± 0.4a |
Note:
Values are given as mean ± SE of five independent biological replicates and bearing different letters (a, b, c) are significantly different from each other according to the least significant difference (LSD) test (P < 0.05). CK, control treatment; B1, Inoculation with Paenibacillus sp. B1; BJ-18, Inoculation with P. beijingensis BJ-18; Mix, Inoculation with Paenibacillus sp. B1 and P. beijingensis BJ-18; BJ-18+P, Inoculation with P. beijingensis BJ-18 and application KH2PO4.
Figure 3Rhizosphere soil total N (A), available P (B) and nitrogenase activity (C).
Values are given as mean of five independent biological replicates, and bearing different letters (a, b, c) are significantly different from each other according to the least significant difference (LSD) test (P < 0.05). The bars represent the standard error. CK, control treatment; B1, Inoculation with Paenibacillus sp. B1; BJ-18, Inoculation with P. beijingensis BJ-18; Mix, Inoculation with Paenibacillus sp. B1 and P. beijingensis BJ-18; BJ-18+P, Inoculation with P. beijingensis BJ-18 and application KH2PO4.
Figure 4The relative expression of nifH in the host plant tissues.
Values are given as mean of five independent biological replicates, and bearing different letters (a, b, c) are significantly different from each other according to the least significant difference (LSD) test (P < 0.05). The bars represent the standard error. CK, control treatment; B1, Inoculation with Paenibacillus sp. B1; BJ-18, Inoculation with P. beijingensis BJ-18; Mix, Inoculation with Paenibacillus sp. B1 and P. beijingensis BJ-18; BJ-18+P, Inoculation with P. beijingensis BJ-18 and application KH2PO4.
Figure 5Pearson’s correlations between the efficiency of BNF and P nutrition of plant whole data set (A), plant root (B), plant shoot (C) and rhizosphere soil (D).
r and P values are provided for each of the linear regression models.