Matthew Griffin1, Veena S Rao1, Juan Ivey-Miranda2, James Fleming1, Devin Mahoney1, Christopher Maulion1, Nisha Suda3, Krishmita Siwakoti4, Tariq Ahmad1, Daniel Jacoby1, Ralph Riello5, Lavanya Bellumkonda1, Zachary Cox6, Sean Collins7, Sangchoon Jeon8, Jeffrey M Turner1,9, F Perry Wilson10, Javed Butler11, Silvio E Inzucchi12, Jeffrey M Testani. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine (M.G., V.S.R., J.F., D.M., C.M., T.A., D.J., L.B., J.M.T.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 2. Hospital de Cardiologia, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico (J.I.-M.). 3. Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York (N.S.). 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Alabama at Birmingham (K.S.). 5. Division of Pharmacy (R.R.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 6. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Lipscomb University College of Pharmacy, Nashville, TN (Z.C.). 7. Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (S.C.). 8. Yale School of Nursing, West Haven, CT (S.J.). 9. Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology (J.M.T.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 10. Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator (F.P.W.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 11. Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi, Jackson (J.B.). 12. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology (S.E.I.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors improve heart failure-related outcomes. The mechanisms underlying these benefits are not well understood, but diuretic properties may contribute. Traditional diuretics such as furosemide induce substantial neurohormonal activation, contributing to the limited improvement in intravascular volume often seen with these agents. However, the proximal tubular site of action of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors may help circumvent these limitations. METHODS:Twenty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic, stable heart failure completed a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study of empagliflozin 10 mg daily versus placebo. Patients underwent an intensive 6-hour biospecimen collection and cardiorenal phenotyping at baseline and again after 14 days of study drug. After a 2-week washout, patients crossed over to the alternate therapy with the above protocol repeated. RESULTS:Oral empagliflozin was rapidly absorbed as evidenced by a 27-fold increase in urinary glucose excretion by 3 hours (P<0.0001). Fractional excretion of sodium increased significantly with empagliflozin monotherapy versus placebo (fractional excretion of sodium, 1.2±0.7% versus 0.7±0.4%; P=0.001), and there was a synergistic effect in combination with bumetanide (fractional excretion of sodium, 5.8±2.5% versus 3.9±1.9%; P=0.001). At 14 days, the natriuretic effect of empagliflozin persisted, resulting in a reduction in blood volume (-208 mL [interquartile range, -536 to 153 mL] versus -14 mL [interquartile range, -282 to 335 mL]; P=0.035) and plasma volume (-138 mL, interquartile range, -379 to 154±453 mL; P=0.04). This natriuresis was not, however, associated with evidence of neurohormonal activation because the change in norepinephrine was superior (P=0.02) and all other neurohormones were similar (P<0.34) during the empagliflozin versus placebo period. Furthermore, there was no evidence of potassium wasting (P=0.20) or renal dysfunction (P>0.11 for all biomarkers), whereas both serum magnesium (P<0.001) and uric acid levels (P=0.008) improved. CONCLUSIONS:Empagliflozin causes significant natriuresis, particularly when combined with loop diuretics, resulting in an improvement in blood volume. However, off-target electrolyte wasting, renal dysfunction, and neurohormonal activation were not observed. This favorable diuretic profile may offer significant advantage in the management of volume status in patients with heart failure and may represent a mechanism contributing to the superior long-term heart failure outcomes observed with these agents. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03027960.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors improve heart failure-related outcomes. The mechanisms underlying these benefits are not well understood, but diuretic properties may contribute. Traditional diuretics such as furosemide induce substantial neurohormonal activation, contributing to the limited improvement in intravascular volume often seen with these agents. However, the proximal tubular site of action of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors may help circumvent these limitations. METHODS: Twenty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic, stable heart failure completed a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study of empagliflozin 10 mg daily versus placebo. Patients underwent an intensive 6-hour biospecimen collection and cardiorenal phenotyping at baseline and again after 14 days of study drug. After a 2-week washout, patients crossed over to the alternate therapy with the above protocol repeated. RESULTS: Oral empagliflozin was rapidly absorbed as evidenced by a 27-fold increase in urinary glucose excretion by 3 hours (P<0.0001). Fractional excretion of sodium increased significantly with empagliflozin monotherapy versus placebo (fractional excretion of sodium, 1.2±0.7% versus 0.7±0.4%; P=0.001), and there was a synergistic effect in combination with bumetanide (fractional excretion of sodium, 5.8±2.5% versus 3.9±1.9%; P=0.001). At 14 days, the natriuretic effect of empagliflozin persisted, resulting in a reduction in blood volume (-208 mL [interquartile range, -536 to 153 mL] versus -14 mL [interquartile range, -282 to 335 mL]; P=0.035) and plasma volume (-138 mL, interquartile range, -379 to 154±453 mL; P=0.04). This natriuresis was not, however, associated with evidence of neurohormonal activation because the change in norepinephrine was superior (P=0.02) and all other neurohormones were similar (P<0.34) during the empagliflozin versus placebo period. Furthermore, there was no evidence of potassium wasting (P=0.20) or renal dysfunction (P>0.11 for all biomarkers), whereas both serum magnesium (P<0.001) and uric acid levels (P=0.008) improved. CONCLUSIONS:Empagliflozin causes significant natriuresis, particularly when combined with loop diuretics, resulting in an improvement in blood volume. However, off-target electrolyte wasting, renal dysfunction, and neurohormonal activation were not observed. This favorable diuretic profile may offer significant advantage in the management of volume status in patients with heart failure and may represent a mechanism contributing to the superior long-term heart failure outcomes observed with these agents. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03027960.
Authors: Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hiddo J L Heerspink; Bruce A Perkins; David H Fitchett; Mansoor Husain; David Z I Cherney Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Vance B Matthews; Rosemary H Elliot; Caroline Rudnicka; Jana Hricova; Lakshini Herat; Markus P Schlaich Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Bruce Neal; Vlado Perkovic; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Dick de Zeeuw; Greg Fulcher; Ngozi Erondu; Wayne Shaw; Gordon Law; Mehul Desai; David R Matthews Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter A Glynn; Hongyan Ning; Aakash Bavishi; Priya M Freaney; Sanjiv Shah; Clyde W Yancy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Sadiya S Khan Journal: Am J Med Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Xuan Li; Qingguo Lu; Yunguang Qiu; Jussara M do Carmo; Zhen Wang; Alexandre A da Silva; Alan Mouton; Ana C M Omoto; Michael E Hall; Ji Li; John E Hall Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-03-13 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Flávio A Borges-Júnior; Danúbia Silva Dos Santos; Acaris Benetti; Juliano Z Polidoro; Aline C T Wisnivesky; Renato O Crajoinas; Ednei L Antônio; Leonardo Jensen; Bruno Caramelli; Gerhard Malnic; Paulo J Tucci; Adriana C C Girardi Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 14.978
Authors: Randa Abdelmasih; Ramy Abdelmaseih; Ravi Thakker; Mohammed Faluk; Arroj Ali; M Mrhaf Alsamman; Syed Mustajab Hasan Journal: Cardiol Res Date: 2021-06-05