Literature DB >> 32410125

PPE Portraits-a Way to Humanize Personal Protective Equipment.

Cati Brown-Johnson1, Stacie Vilendrer2, Mary Beth Heffernan3, Shira Winter2, Thanh Khong4, Jennifer Reidy5, Steven M Asch2,6.   

Abstract

The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) has skyrocketed, as providers don masks, glasses, and gowns to protect their eyes, noses, and mouths from COVID-19. Yet these same facial features express human individuality, and are crucial to nonverbal communication. Isolated ICU patients may develop "post intensive-care syndrome," which mimics PTSD with sometimes debilitating consequences. While far from a complete solution, PPE Portraits (disposable portrait picture stickers - 4" × 5") have the potential to humanize care. Preparing for a larger effectiveness evaluation on patient and provider experience, we collected initial qualitative implementation insights during Spring 2020's chaotic surge preparation. Front-line providers reported more comfort with patient interactions while wearing PPE Portraits: "It makes it feel less like a disaster zone [for the patient]." A brief pilot showed signs of significant adoption: a participating physician requested PPE Portraits at their clinic, shift nurses had taken PPE Portraits with them to inpatient services, and masked medical assistant team-members requested PPE Portraits to wear over scrubs. We believe PPE Portraits may support patient care and health, and even potentially healthcare team function and provider wellness. While we await data on these effects, we hope hospitals can use our findings to speed their own implementation testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32410125      PMCID: PMC7224350          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05875-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) has skyrocketed during the COVID-19 crisis, as providers don masks, glasses, and gowns to protect their eyes, noses, and mouths. Yet these same facial features express human individuality, and are crucial to nonverbal communication. Even in a crisis, human connection is at the core of medical care,[1] and PPE, while necessary, can interrupt that connection.[2] Especially for COVID-19 patients needing ICU care, some worry that a lack of human connection can have adverse effects beyond simple satisfaction or patient experience measures. Studies have shown that isolated ICU patients may develop “post intensive-care syndrome,” which mimics PTSD with sometimes debilitating consequences. A 2010 systematic review of patients placed in contact isolation for infection control showed adverse impacts of isolation on mental well-being, satisfaction, and several measures of patient safety.[3] Conversely, provider warmth and compassion have been positively associated with physiological health biomarkers, and researchers have called for testing interventions to promote perceptions of kindness.[4] Healthcare workers across the USA intent on humanizing the COVID-19 experience have innovated alternative communication methods to bridge the gap between PPE-covered provider and patient. At Parkland Hospital, providers created handouts with photos, names, and reassuring text (“Dear Friend…you are in the hands of people who care about your health”). Stanford Hospital, among many others, is implementing virtual rounding, which allows providers to meet “face-to-face” with hospitalized patients over secure video prior to in-person physical exams during which their features will be necessarily obscured. While far from a complete solution, PPE Portraits also have the potential to help humanize care in difficult times. They are simply disposable provider portrait picture stickers (4" × 5") affixed to PPE where patients can see them. Anecdotal pilot data captured during treatment of Ebola showed that PPE Portraits helped patients feel more connected to their caregivers, and helped healthcare workers feel more like a team and connected to one another, though this has yet to be rigorously studied (Figs. 1).[5]
Figure 1

PPE Portrait Project “Nurse Ruth” (Ruth Haddad Johnson, RN) during the Ebola crisis, photo credit Mary Beth Heffernan.

PPE Portrait Project “Nurse Ruth” (Ruth Haddad Johnson, RN) during the Ebola crisis, photo credit Mary Beth Heffernan. PPE Portraits—process. In partnership with the designer of the original PPE Portrait Project in Africa, Mary Beth Heffernan, Stanford Express Care is piloting PPE Portraits for the newly created drive-thru COVID-19 testing.[6] Similarly, the inpatient palliative care team at UMass Memorial Medical Center has begun using PPE Portraits in caring for seriously ill patients in the hospital, regardless of infection status. In preparation for a larger evaluation of the effectiveness of PPE Portraits on patient and provider experience, we collected initial qualitative data on implementation barriers and facilitators during the chaotic surge preparation activities of March and April 2020. We share practical lessons for implementing similar programs for others to use. Front-line providers reported more comfort with patient interactions while wearing PPE Portraits: “It makes it feel less like a disaster zone [for the patient].” Just a 2-day pilot showed signs of significant adoption: a participating physician requested PPE Portraits at a new COVID-19 clinic, shift nurses had taken PPE Portraits with them to inpatient services, and masked medical assistant team-members were requesting PPE Portraits to wear over scrubs. Using the process in Figure 2, we took smartphone portraits, electronically pasted four portraits on an 8" × 11" template, and printed. We also developed workarounds and contingencies. After running out of stickers during high volume, we printed extra copies to have some on reserve. Since full color portraits use large amounts of ink, we kept a close eye on printer supplies. We also tested printing PPE Portraits on nonsticker paper in case sticker supplies dwindled, and we explored the idea of affixing these pictures on PPE with masking tape.
Figure 2

PPE Portraits—process.

PPE Portraits are a simple intervention with the potential to improve COVID-19 care. Of course, in our April 2020 US context, needed PPE itself is not always available, let alone the clinician or administrator time needed to take and print portrait photos to stick on full PPE. Preparing PPE Portraits or other humanizing approaches in anticipation of surges would have been much preferred. Still we believe PPE Portraits may support patient care and health, and even potentially healthcare team function and provider wellness. While we await data on these effects, we hope hospitals can use our findings to speed their own implementation testing.
  3 in total

1.  Compassionomics: Hypothesis and experimental approach.

Authors:  Stephen Trzeciak; Brian W Roberts; Anthony J Mazzarelli
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 1.538

2.  Practices to Foster Physician Presence and Connection With Patients in the Clinical Encounter.

Authors:  Donna M Zulman; Marie C Haverfield; Jonathan G Shaw; Cati G Brown-Johnson; Rachel Schwartz; Aaron A Tierney; Dani L Zionts; Nadia Safaeinili; Meredith Fischer; Sonoo Thadaney Israni; Steven M Asch; Abraham Verghese
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Adverse effects of isolation in hospitalised patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  C Abad; A Fearday; N Safdar
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.926

  3 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Impact of COVID-19 and other infectious conditions requiring isolation on the provision of and adaptations to fundamental nursing care in hospital in terms of overall patient experience, care quality, functional ability, and treatment outcomes: systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Whear; Rebecca A Abbott; Alison Bethel; David A Richards; Ruth Garside; Emma Cockcroft; Heather Iles-Smith; Pip A Logan; Ann Marie Rafferty; Maggie Shepherd; Holly V R Sugg; Anne Marie Russell; Susanne Cruickshank; Susannah Tooze; G J Melendez-Torres; Jo Thompson Coon
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.057

2.  The marked body - a qualitative study on survivors embodied experiences of a COVID-19 illness trajectory.

Authors:  Malene Missel; Camilla Bernild; Signe Westh Christensen; Ilkay Dagyaran; Selina Kikkenborg Berg
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2021-03-18

Review 3.  COVID-19 Pandemic Support Programs for Healthcare Workers and Implications for Occupational Mental Health: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Eden David; Jonathan M DePierro; Deborah B Marin; Vanshdeep Sharma; Dennis S Charney; Craig L Katz
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2021-10-04

4.  Patient Perspectives of Inpatient Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Assessment.

Authors:  Stacie Vilendrer; Sarah Sackeyfio; Eliel Akinbami; Roy Ghosh; Jacklyn Ha Luu; Divya Pathak; Masahiro Shimada; Emmanuelle Elise Williamson; Lisa Shieh
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-03-30

5.  Nurses' strategies for overcoming barriers to fundamental nursing care in patients with COVID-19 caused by infection with the SARS-COV-2 virus: Results from the 'COVID-NURSE' survey.

Authors:  Holly V R Sugg; David A Richards; Anne-Marie Russell; Sarah Burnett; Emma J Cockcroft; Jo Thompson Coon; Susanne Cruickshank; Faye E Doris; Harriet A Hunt; Heather Iles-Smith; Merryn Kent; Philippa A Logan; Leila M Morgan; Naomi Morley; Anne Marie Rafferty; Maggie H Shepherd; Sally J Singh; Susannah J Tooze; Rebecca Whear
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.057

6.  Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.

Authors:  Alex Pollock; Pauline Campbell; Joshua Cheyne; Julie Cowie; Bridget Davis; Jacqueline McCallum; Kris McGill; Andrew Elders; Suzanne Hagen; Doreen McClurg; Claire Torrens; Margaret Maxwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-11-05

7.  A Bronx tale: Exposure, containment and care on inpatient psychiatry units during COVID-19.

Authors:  Sharon Spitzer Sverd; Laura E Gardner; Johanna A Cabassa; Matthew Schneider; Rachel H Noone; Maryam H Jahdi; Andrei Nagorny; Ruchika Jain; Jonathan E Alpert; Vilma Gabbay
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  Provider Perceptions of a Humanizing Intervention for Health Care Workers-A Survey Study of PPE Portraits.

Authors:  Jennifer Reidy; Cati Brown-Johnson; Nancy McCool; Shawna Steadman; Mary B Heffernan; Vandana Nagpal
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.612

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.