Literature DB >> 32410056

Assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using ultra-low-dose thallium-201 SPECT on a CZT camera: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Marek Sala1, Vladimír Kincl2,3, Milan Kamínek4,5, Jiří Vašina4,6, Jan Máchal4,7, Roman Panovský1,4, Věra Feitová4,8, Lukáš Opatřil1,4, Tomáš Holeček4,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride (CZT) technology allows use of low activities of radiopharmaceuticals. The aim was to verify the values of left ventricular volume parameters, obtained via ultra-low-dose thallium Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) using a CZT camera. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Forty-five patients referred for an assessment of myocardial perfusion or viability imaging were examined using CZT-SPECT and 1.5 T magnetic resonance (MRI) scanner. The ultra-low-dose protocol with 0.5 Mbq 201-Tl per kg of body weight was used. The values of end-systolic (ESV) and end-diastolic volumes (EDV), left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and myocardial mass (MM) were assessed using both techniques. A very good correlation was found between the EF, ESV, and EDV values assessed with CZT-SPECT and cardiac magnetic resonance MRI; the Pearson coefficients were 0.86, 0.95, and 0.91, respectively. A moderate correlation was found for myocardial mass, r = 0.57. Compared to MRI, SPECT systematically overestimated ESV and MM, while it underestimates the EF, with P ≤ .001 in all cases. There was no difference in EDV estimation.
CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction assessed via ultra-low-dose CZT-SPECT showed very good correlation with the values obtained by MRI. A moderate correlation was found for myocardial mass.
© 2020. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CZT; Left ventricular ejection fraction; Myocardial mass; Volumes; thallium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32410056     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02161-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  6 in total

1.  Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease referred to PET myocardial perfusion imaging: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roberta Green; Valeria Cantoni; Wanda Acampa; Roberta Assante; Emilia Zampella; Carmela Nappi; Valeria Gaudieri; Teresa Mannarino; Renato Cuocolo; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Myocardial perfusion years after radiation therapy for left-sided breast cancer: Normal or abnormal? This is the question.

Authors:  Alberto Aimo; Alessia Gimelli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  The unique value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and culprit-free coronary angiograms.

Authors:  Roman Panovský; Júlia Borová; Martin Pleva; Věra Feitová; Petr Novotný; Vladimír Kincl; Tomáš Holeček; Jaroslav Meluzín; Ondřej Sochor; Radka Štěpánová
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing.

Authors:  Jeanette Schulz-Menger; David A Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond J Kim; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Christopher M Kramer; Dudley J Pennell; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.364

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  82Rb PET/CT left ventricular mass computations.

Authors:  Andrew Van Tosh; Kenneth J Nichols
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.872

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.