Literature DB >> 32409977

Angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance as a novel, pressure-wire-free tool to assess coronary microcirculation in ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Giovanni Luigi De Maria1, Roberto Scarsini1, Mayooran Shanmuganathan1,2, Rafail A Kotronias1, Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios1, Alessandra Borlotti1, Jeremy P Langrish1, Andrew J Lucking1, Robin P Choudhury1, Rajesh Kharbanda1, Vanessa M Ferreira1,2, Keith M Channon1, Hector M Garcia-Garcia3, Adrian P Banning4.   

Abstract

Immediate assessment of coronary microcirculation during treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may facilitate patient stratification for targeted treatment algorithms. Use of pressure-wire to measure the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is possible but has inevitable practical restrictions. We aimed to develop and validate angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMRangio) as a novel and pressure-wire-free index to facilitate assessment of the coronary microcirculation. 45 STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) were enrolled. Immediately before stenting and at completion of pPCI, IMR was measured within the infarct related artery (IRA). At the same time points, 2 angiographic views were acquired during hyperaemia to measure quantitative flow ratio (QFR) from which IMRangio was derived. In a subset of 15 patients both IMR and IMRangio were also measured in the non-IRA. Patients underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 48 h for assessment of microvascular obstruction (MVO). IMRangio and IMR were significantly correlated (ρ: 0.85, p < 0.001). Both IMR and IMRangio were higher in the IRA rather than in the non-IRA (p = 0.01 and p = 0.006, respectively) and were higher in patients with evidence of clinically significant MVO (> 1.55% of left ventricular mass) (p = 0.03 and p = 0.005, respectively). Post-pPCI IMRangio presented and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96 (CI95% 0.92-1.00, p < 0.001) for prediction of post-pPCI IMR > 40U and of 0.81 (CI95% 0.65-0.97, p < 0.001) for MVO > 1.55%. IMRangio is a promising tool for the assessment of coronary microcirculation. Assessment of IMR without the use of a pressure-wire may enable more rapid, convenient and cost-effective assessment of coronary microvascular function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Index of microcirculatory resistance; Microvascular dysfunction; Microvascular obstruction; Quantitative flow ratio; STEMI

Year:  2020        PMID: 32409977     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-01831-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  10 in total

1.  Association of quantitative flow ratio-derived microcirculatory indices with anatomical-functional discordance in intermediate coronary lesions.

Authors:  Liang Geng; Yuan Yuan; Peizhao Du; Liming Gao; Yunkai Wang; Jiming Li; Wei Guo; Ying Huang; Qi Zhang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Prognostic value of combined coronary angiography-derived IMR and myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT SPECT in INOCA.

Authors:  Lu Liu; Neng Dai; Guoqing Yin; Wen Zhang; Abdul-Quddus Mohammed; Siling Xu; Xian Lv; Tingting Shi; Cailin Feng; Ayman A Mohammed; Redhwan M Mareai; Yawei Xu; Xuejing Yu; Fuad A Abdu; Fei Yu; Wenliang Che
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Clinical implication of QFR in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Jiani Tang; Jiapeng Chu; Hanjing Hou; Yan Lai; Shengxian Tu; Fei Chen; Yian Yao; Zi Ye; Yanhua Gao; Yu Mao; Shaowei Zhuang; Xuebo Liu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  The Role of Coronary Physiology in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Federico Marin; Roberto Scarsini; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Rafail A Kotronias; Flavio Ribichini; Adrian P Banning; Giovanni Luigi De Maria
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2022

5.  Cardiovascular imaging 2020 in the international journal of cardiovascular imaging: the 10 most downloaded papers in the year 2020.

Authors:  Arthur Stillman; Johan H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Microvascular and Prognostic Effect in Lesions With Different Stent Expansion During Primary PCI for STEMI: Insights From Coronary Physiology and Intravascular Ultrasound.

Authors:  Xida Li; Shuo Sun; Demou Luo; Xing Yang; Jingguang Ye; Xiaosheng Guo; Shenghui Xu; Boyu Sun; Youti Zhang; Jianfang Luo; Yingling Zhou; Shengxian Tu; Haojian Dong
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-09

Review 7.  "No-Reflow" Phenomenon: A Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Gianmarco Annibali; Innocenzo Scrocca; Tiziana Claudia Aranzulla; Emanuele Meliga; Francesco Maiellaro; Giuseppe Musumeci
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 8.  Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve: State of the Art.

Authors:  Alessandra Scoccia; Mariusz Tomaniak; Tara Neleman; Frederik T W Groenland; Annemieke C Ziedses des Plantes; Joost Daemen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.955

9.  The Coronary Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Predicts Left Ventricular Performance Recovery in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Chang Hou; Meng Guo; Yuliang Ma; Qi Li; Chuanfen Liu; Mingyu Lu; Hong Zhao; Jian Liu
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 1.776

10.  Association of endothelial glycocalyx shedding and coronary microcirculation assessed by an angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Si Chen; Shaoyan Liu; Guoqiang Sun; Zhijun Sun; Hongbin Liu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.