Literature DB >> 32409775

Commonly used mouse strains have distinct vascular properties.

Jochen Steppan1, Sandeep Jandu2, Huilei Wang3, Sara Kang2, William Savage2, Roshini Narayanan3, Kavitha Nandakumar2, Lakshmi Santhanam2,3.   

Abstract

Mice are the most common animal model to investigate human disease and explore physiology. Mice are practical, cost efficient, and easily used for genetic manipulations. Although variability in cardiac structure and function among mouse strains is well noted, the effect of mouse strain on vascular stiffness indices is not known. Here, we compared mouse strain-dependent differences in key vascular stiffness indices among frequently used inbred mouse strains-C57Bl/6J, 129S, and Bl6/129S. In young healthy animals, baseline blood pressure and heart rate were identical in all strains, and independent of gender. However, both active in vivo and passive ex vivo vascular stiffness indices exhibited distinct differences. Specifically, both male and female 129S animals demonstrated the highest tensile stiffness, were least responsive to acetylcholine-induced vasorelaxation, and showed the lowest pulse wave velocity (PWV), an index of in vivo stiffness. C57Bl/6J mice demonstrated the highest PWV, lowest tensile stiffness, and the highest response to acetylcholine-induced vasorelaxation. Interestingly, within each strain, female mice had more compliant aortas. C57Bl/6J mice had thinner vessel walls with fewer layers, whereas 129S mice had the thickest walls with the most layers. Values in the Bl6/129S mixed background mice fell between C57Bl/6J and 129S mice. In conclusion, we show that underlying vascular properties of different inbred wild-type mouse strains are distinct, despite superficial similarities in blood pressure. For each genetic modification, care should be taken to identify proper controls, and conclusions might need to be verified in more than one strain to minimize the risk of false positive studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mouse model; Strains; Vasculature

Year:  2020        PMID: 32409775      PMCID: PMC7926191          DOI: 10.1038/s41440-020-0467-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  1 in total

1.  Genetic control of blood pressure in mice.

Authors:  G Schlager; R S Weibust
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 4.562

  1 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Annual reports on hypertension research 2020.

Authors:  Masaki Mogi; Yukihito Higashi; Kanako Bokuda; Atsuhiro Ichihara; Daisuke Nagata; Atsushi Tanaka; Koichi Node; Yoichi Nozato; Koichi Yamamoto; Ken Sugimoto; Hirotaka Shibata; Satoshi Hoshide; Hitoshi Nishizawa; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 2.  Genetically modified mouse models to help fight COVID-19.

Authors:  Channabasavaiah B Gurumurthy; Rolen M Quadros; Guy P Richardson; Larisa Y Poluektova; Suzanne L Mansour; Masato Ohtsuka
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Probing tissue transglutaminase mediated vascular smooth muscle cell aging using a novel transamidation-deficient Tgm2-C277S mouse model.

Authors:  Huilei Wang; James Chen; Sandeep Jandu; Sean Melucci; William Savage; Kavitha Nandakumar; Sara K Kang; Sebastian Barreto-Ortiz; Alan Poe; Shivam Rastogi; Maria Bauer; Jochen Steppan; Lakshmi Santhanam
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2021-07-29

4.  The podocyte-specific knockout of palladin in mice with a 129 genetic background affects podocyte morphology and the expression of palladin interacting proteins.

Authors:  Nadine Artelt; Alina M Ritter; Linda Leitermann; Felix Kliewe; Rabea Schlüter; Stefan Simm; Jens van den Brandt; Karlhans Endlich; Nicole Endlich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.