| Literature DB >> 32409753 |
Mohammad Kashif Uddin1,2, Abu Nasar3.
Abstract
The low cost, eco-friendly and potential biomass, i.e. walnut (Juglans regia) shell powder was deployed for the removal of toxic methylene blue dye from contaminated water solution. The important characterization of the waste material was conducted by using several techniques, i.e. Scanning electron microscope, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, X-ray powder diffraction, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area analysis, and Thermogravimetric analysis. The marked impact of various operating conditions, i.e. dose, concentration, time, pH and temperature on the adsorption process was investigated. Increasing pH resulted in an increase of percent dye adsorption, and the adsorption mechanism was occurred by electrostatic attraction between negative adsorbent surface and positive dye molecules. The equilibrium data suited with Langmuir isotherm model while the adsorption practice followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Higher temperature reduced the adsorption of dye molecules. The adsorption process was spontaneous, exothermic and chemical. The critical statistical analysis of the experimental results was directed by forming the design of the experiment, which was further, optimized by ANOVA, 3D and perturbation plots. The error and predicted values of both the studied responses as derived from the statistical model showed the agreeable results. 0.1 N HCl was found to be effective in complete desorption. The results are very practical and prove the effectiveness of walnut shell powder in the usage of decolorization for methylene blue.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32409753 PMCID: PMC7224211 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64745-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1FTIR images of raw WNS and MB-adsorbed WNS.
Figure 2(a) SEM image of raw WNS (b) SEM image of MB-adsorbed WNS (c) EDX spectra of raw WNS (d) EDX spectra of raw WNS.
Figure 3(a) TGA analysis of raw WNS (b) XRD of raw WNS.
Figure 4(a) Effect of initial pH on percentage (%) MB adsorption onto WNS (b) Point of zero charge.
Figure 5(a) The percentage adsorption and adsorption capacity of MB as a function of adsorbent dose (b) Effect of shaking speed on % MB adsorption onto WNS (c) Effect of contact time and initial concentration on MB adsorption.
Adsorption isotherm parameters and statistical analysis for the adsorption of MB onto WNS.
| Isotherm model | Linear equation | Parameters | Values |
|---|---|---|---|
| Langmuir | Where b refers to Langmuir adsorption constant | b (L/mg) qm (mg/g) R2 p-value MSE SST SD | 0.054 36.631 0.961 0.003 0.000 0.014 0.094 |
| Freundlich | Where K refers to Freundlich constant | K (L/mg)1/n n (g/L) R2 p-value MSE SST SD | 2.762 1.560 0.941 0.006 0.003 0.197 0.277 |
| D-R | Where qDR is D-R isotherm saturation capacity and β is D-R isotherm constant which gives mean free energy (E) per molecule of adsorbate when it is transferred from the bulk solution to the surface of the solid and given by Eq. ( | β (mol2J2) E (kJ/mol) R2 p-value MSE SST | 5 × 10−9 10.00 0.947 0.005 0.018 1.045 |
Figure 6Isotherm plots of the models: (a) Langmuir (b) Freundlich (c) D-R; and (d) Pseudo second order kinetics.
Pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order kinetic parameters for the adsorption of MB onto. WNS.
| Concentration (mg/L) | qe(exp) (mg/g) | Pseudo-first-order kinetics | Pseudo-second -order kinetics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qe(cal) (mg/g) | k1 (1/min) | R2 | qe(cal) (mg/g) | k2 (g/mg/min) | h (g/mg/min) | R2 | ||
| 50 | 4.713 | 0.647 | 0.003 | 0.842 | 4.697 | 0.053 | 1.191 | 0.999 |
| 70 | 6.668 | 0.729 | 0.002 | 0.466 | 6.6 | 0.045 | 1.988 | 0.999 |
| 90 | 8.534 | 0.981 | 0.004 | 0.573 | 8.496 | 0.04 | 2.929 | 0.999 |
| 100 | 9.406 | 1.021 | 0.005 | 0.803 | 9.398 | 0.043 | 3.838 | 0.999 |
| 150 | 14.363 | 1.39 | 0.003 | 0.64 | 14.306 | 0.023 | 4.842 | 0.999 |
| 200 | 18.192 | 1.803 | 0.003 | 0.452 | 18.115 | 0.021 | 6.939 | 0.999 |
Thermodynamic parameters for the adsorption of MB onto WNS.
| ΔH° (kJ/mol) | ΔS° (J/K) | ΔG° (kJ/mol) | R2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 303 K | 313 K | 323 K | |||
| −4.169 | −9.118 | −1.307 | −1.171 | −1.124 | 0.878 |
ANOVA results for Y1 and Y2.
| Source | Response (Y1) | Response (Y2) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-value | p-value | F-value | p-value | |
| Model | 197.56 | <0.0001 | 22.9 | <0.0001 |
| X1 | 8.66 | 0.0107 | 210.46 | <0.0001 |
| X2 | 404.03 | <0.0001 | 4.37 | 0.0552 |
| X3 | 2134.56 | <0.0001 | 31.09 | <0.0001 |
| X4 | 22.51 | 0.0003 | 16.52 | 0.0012 |
| X12 | 7.34 | 0.0169 | 43.1 | <0.0001 |
| X22 | 143.59 | <0.0001 | 0.3 | 0.591 |
| X32 | 1.55 | 0.2333 | 1.12 | 0.3087 |
| X42 | 8.47 | 0.0114 | 4.56 | 0.0508 |
| X1X2 | 8.197 × 10−4 | 0.9776 | 0.045 | 0.8343 |
| X1X3 | 8.197 × 10−4 | 0.9776 | 0 | 1 |
| X1X4 | 5.25 | 0.038 | 7.265 × 10−5 | 0.9933 |
| X2X3 | 8.197 × 10−4 | 0.9776 | 0 | 1 |
| X2X4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| X3X4 | 0.89 | 0.3608 | 10.22 | 0.0065 |
Figure 7Linear correlation plots between the experimental and predicted values of responses (a) Y1 and (b) Y2.
Figure 83D surface plots showing the effect of: pH and dose on (a) Y1 and (b) Y2; pH and concentration on (c) Y1 and (d) Y2; pH and time on (e) Y1 and (f) Y2; dose and concentration on (g) Y1 and (h) Y2; dose and time on (i) Y1 and (j) Y2; concentration and time on (k) Y1 and (l) Y2.
Figure 9Perturbation plots (a) Y1 and (b) Y2.
Figure 10Adsorption/Desorption of MB onto WNS.
Figure 11Breakthrough curve.