Literature DB >> 32409554

Draft Genome Sequence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis Strain UMB0843, Isolated from the Female Urinary Tract.

Natalia Purta1, Taylor Miller-Ensminger2, Adelina Voukadinova2, Alan J Wolfe3, Catherine Putonti4,3,5,6.   

Abstract

Here, we introduce the 2.8-Mbp draft genome of Enterococcus faecalis strain UMB0843, isolated from the female urinary tract. E. faecalis is a leading cause of nosocomial infections, and many strains are often resistant to multiple antibiotics. We focus our genome analysis on the multiple genes involved in antibiotic resistance in this strain.
Copyright © 2020 Purta et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32409554      PMCID: PMC7225553          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.00407-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Enterococcus faecalis lives in the gastrointestinal tract of many organisms (1) and has recently emerged as a leading cause of nosocomial infections due to its increased resistance to many antibiotics (2, 3). E. faecalis is often a primary cause of surgical infections, infections within the bloodstream, and urinary tract infections (UTIs) (3, 4). Recently, we isolated E. faecalis strain UMB0843 from a urine sample obtained from a pregnant female. Here, we present the draft genome sequence of this isolate and the antibiotic resistance genes found within the genome. E. faecalis UMB0843 was collected as part of a previous institutional review board (IRB)-approved study (5) and cultured using the expanded quantitative urine culture (EQUC) protocol (6). To determine the genus and species of each isolate, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry was used, following a protocol detailed previously (6), prior to storage of the isolates at −80°C. From the freezer stocks, E. faecalis was streaked onto a Columbia nalidixic acid (CNA) agar plate and incubated at 35°C in 5% CO2 for 24 h. A single colony was selected, inoculated in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (premixed BBL brain heart infusion; BD), and incubated under the same conditions described above. DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit and quantified using the fluorescence-based Qubit. The Gram-positive extraction protocol was followed with the following exception: 230 μl of lysis buffer was used (180 μl of 20 mM Tris-Cl, 2 mM sodium EDTA, and 1.2% Triton X-100 and 50 μl of lysozyme). The extracted DNA was sent to the Microbial Genome Sequencing Center (MiGS) at the University of Pittsburgh for sequencing. The DNA was first enzymatically fragmented using the Illumina tagmentation enzyme, and then indices were attached using PCR. Sequencing was performed using an Illumina NextSeq 550 flow cell, and 1,590,783 pairs of 150-bp reads were generated. The raw reads were trimmed using Sickle v1.33 (https://github.com/najoshi/sickle) and assembled using SPAdes v3.13.0 with the “only-assembler” option for k values of 55, 77, 99, and 127 (7). BBMap v38.47 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/) was used to calculate the genome coverage. Genome sequences were annotated using PATRIC v3.6.3 (8), while the publicly available genome was annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v4.11 (9). Unless stated otherwise, default parameters were used for all software. The E. faecalis UMB0843 draft genome is 2,805,168 bp long, assembled into 20 contigs with a genome coverage of 147× and an N50 score of 284,798 bp. The genome has a GC content of 38%, similar to that of other genomes of the species. PGAP identified 2,611 protein-coding regions. Both annotation tools found 51 tRNAs and 5 complete rRNA gene sequences (3 5S, 1 16S, and 1 23S). While resistance of this strain was not experimentally tested, PATRIC reported 39 genes associated with antibiotic resistance. Upon further investigation using ResFinder v3.2 (10), only antibiotic resistance to macrolides was detected [resistance gene, lsa(A)]. Our analysis suggests that this strain is susceptible to vancomycin, commonly used as the last line of defense. Vancomycin-resistant strains of E. faecalis emerged in the United States first in 1989 (11) and have become a significant concern for UTI treatment (12).

Data availability.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. JAAUWL000000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, JAAUWL010000000. The raw sequencing reads have been deposited in the SRA under the accession no. SRR11441019.
  12 in total

1.  SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Urine is not sterile: use of enhanced urine culture techniques to detect resident bacterial flora in the adult female bladder.

Authors:  Evann E Hilt; Kathleen McKinley; Meghan M Pearce; Amy B Rosenfeld; Michael J Zilliox; Elizabeth R Mueller; Linda Brubaker; Xiaowu Gai; Alan J Wolfe; Paul C Schreckenberger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Intestinal colonization resistance.

Authors:  Trevor D Lawley; Alan W Walker
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 4.  Virulence of enterococci.

Authors:  B D Jett; M M Huycke; M S Gilmore
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  In vitro susceptibility studies of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  D F Sahm; J Kissinger; M S Gilmore; P R Murray; R Mulder; J Solliday; B Clarke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Genomic transition of enterococci from gut commensals to leading causes of multidrug-resistant hospital infection in the antibiotic era.

Authors:  Michael S Gilmore; Francois Lebreton; Willem van Schaik
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 7.934

7.  NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006-2007.

Authors:  Alicia I Hidron; Jonathan R Edwards; Jean Patel; Teresa C Horan; Dawn M Sievert; Daniel A Pollock; Scott K Fridkin
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes.

Authors:  Ea Zankari; Henrik Hasman; Salvatore Cosentino; Martin Vestergaard; Simon Rasmussen; Ole Lund; Frank M Aarestrup; Mette Voldby Larsen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center.

Authors:  Alice R Wattam; James J Davis; Rida Assaf; Sébastien Boisvert; Thomas Brettin; Christopher Bun; Neal Conrad; Emily M Dietrich; Terry Disz; Joseph L Gabbard; Svetlana Gerdes; Christopher S Henry; Ronald W Kenyon; Dustin Machi; Chunhong Mao; Eric K Nordberg; Gary J Olsen; Daniel E Murphy-Olson; Robert Olson; Ross Overbeek; Bruce Parrello; Gordon D Pusch; Maulik Shukla; Veronika Vonstein; Andrew Warren; Fangfang Xia; Hyunseung Yoo; Rick L Stevens
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Comparative study of antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation among Gram-positive uropathogens isolated from community-acquired urinary tract infections and catheter-associated urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Lok Bahadur Shrestha; Ratna Baral; Basudha Khanal
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.