Literature DB >> 32409526

Draft Genome Sequences of Two Extensively Drug-Resistant Strains of Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from Clinical Samples in Pakistan.

Sara Lomonaco1, Matthew A Crawford2, Christine Lascols3,4, Debra J Fisher2, Kevin Anderson5, David R Hodge5, Segaran P Pillai6, Stephen A Morse4, Erum Khan7, Molly A Hughes2, Marc W Allard8, Shashi K Sharma8.   

Abstract

Infections in immunocompromised patients that are caused by extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii strains have been increasingly reported worldwide. In particular, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strains are a prominent cause of health care-associated infections. Here, we report draft genome assemblies for two clinical XDR A. baumannii isolates obtained from hospitalized patients in Pakistan.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32409526      PMCID: PMC7225525          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.00026-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Acinetobacter baumannii, a Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen of the Moraxellaceae family, can carry multiple antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants. Infections and outbreaks caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) A. baumannii strains in immunocompromised patients have been increasingly reported worldwide (1), with isolates often belonging to international clone 2/sequence type 2 (ST2) (2). Carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) strains are a significant cause of health care-associated infections in Pakistan, with various prevalence rates (62% to 100%) (3). The most common β-lactamases in CRAB strains are acquired (e.g., blaOXA-23, blaOXA-40, blaOXA-58, blaOXA-143, and blaOXA-235) and intrinsic (e.g., blaOXA-51 and blaOXA-69) carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinases (4). Draft genomes are reported here for two clinical XDR A. baumannii isolates obtained from urine (CFSAN059604, isolated in 2004) and throat (CFSAN059618, isolated in 1998) specimens from hospitalized patients in Pakistan. Patient samples were inoculated onto nonselective (e.g., blood agar) and differential (e.g., MacConkey agar) plates and incubated for 24 to 48 h at 37°C. API 20E and Vitek 2 (bioMérieux) systems were used for species identification and confirmation, respectively. Susceptibility testing against clinically relevant antimicrobials was performed by conventional broth microdilution (5) following CLSI and EUCAST guidelines and breakpoints (5–7). The two isolates were resistant to 17 antibiotics with the same MICs, as follows: ≥128 μg/ml for piperacillin-tazobactam; ≥64 μg/ml for cefotaxime and aztreonam; ≥32 μg/ml for ampicillin, ceftriaxone, and tetracycline; ≥16 μg/ml for cefoxitin, ceftazidime-avibactam, gentamicin, and chloramphenicol; and ≥8 μg/ml for cefazolin, doripenem, meropenem, ertapenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. CFSAN059604 and CFSAN059618 were also resistant, but with different MICs, to ampicillin-sulbactam (≥32 and ≥16 μg/ml, respectively), ceftazidime (≥128 and ≥16 μg/ml, respectively), cefepime (≥32 and ≥16 μg/ml, respectively), and imipenem (≥8 and ≥16 μg/ml, respectively). Both isolates were susceptible to colistin (≤2 μg/ml) and minocycline (≤4 μg/ml). Finally, CFSAN059604 and CFSAN059618 had markedly different resistance profiles for amikacin (≤2 and ≥64 μg/ml, respectively) and tobramycin (≤1 and ≥16 μg/ml, respectively). Isolates were grown overnight in lysogeny broth (Lennox), and DNA was extracted using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen). Libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit and sequenced on a MiSeq (CFSAN059618) or NextSeq (CFSAN059604) sequencer (Illumina), with paired-end sequencing technology (2 × 250-bp and 2 × 150-bp sequencing, respectively). Minimum sequence quality was represented by average coverage greater than 50× and Q scores for reads 1 and 2 greater than 30 (8). Absence of contamination was confirmed with Kraken (9). Default parameters were used unless otherwise noted. De novo assemblies were obtained with Shovill v0.9 (https://github.com/tseemann/shovill), available in the GalaxyTrakr pipeline (10). The “trim reads” option was selected, and 500 bp was set as the minimum contig length. Draft genomes were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (11). Table 1 lists the number of reads, number of contigs per assembly, genome size, and GC content for each isolate. The isolates were assigned to ST2 (CFSAN059604) and ST23 (CFSAN059618), based on the multilocus sequence typing Pasteur scheme (https://pubmlst.org/abaumannii). NCBI Pathogen Detection (PD) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pathogens) was used to identify 14 (CFSAN059604) and 8 (CFSAN059618) AMR genes. NCBI PD uses AMRFinderPlus to assign the most specific AMR protein by using a hierarchy of gene families/symbols/names (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pathogens/antimicrobial-resistance/AMRFinder). Results are available in Table 1 and from the NCBI PD website (CFSAN059604 and CFSAN059618).
TABLE 1

Assembly statistics, accession numbers, and AMR genes for the XDR Acinetobacter baumannii isolates examined in this work

Samplea BioSample accession no.Yr isolatedSRA accession no.GenBank accession no.No. of contigsTotal length (bp)N50 (bp)GC content (%)Genome coverage (×)Avg read quality score for:
No. of readsNo. of AMR genes
Read 1Read 2
CFSAN059604SAMN100868142004SRR8837010SSMO00000000483,944,772261,64138.971232b 30b 21,896,36214c
CFSAN059618SAMN100868211998SRR8837150SSMN00000000793,907,254116,85638.89335331,792,4488d

The two isolates belong to NCBI BioProject PRJNA342326.

Average of four lanes.

Genes aac(3)-I, aadA1, adeC, ant(3ʺ)-IIa, aph(3ʺ)-Ib, aph(3′)-Ia, aph(6)-Id, blaADC, blaOXA-254, blaTEM-1, qacEΔ1, sul1, sul2, and tet(B).

Genes ant(2ʺ)-Ia, ant(3ʺ)-IIa, aph(3′)-VIa, blaADC-76, blaOXA-235, blaOXA-68, sul2, and tet(39).

Assembly statistics, accession numbers, and AMR genes for the XDR Acinetobacter baumannii isolates examined in this work The two isolates belong to NCBI BioProject PRJNA342326. Average of four lanes. Genes aac(3)-I, aadA1, adeC, ant(3ʺ)-IIa, aph(3ʺ)-Ib, aph(3′)-Ia, aph(6)-Id, blaADC, blaOXA-254, blaTEM-1, qacEΔ1, sul1, sul2, and tet(B). Genes ant(2ʺ)-Ia, ant(3ʺ)-IIa, aph(3′)-VIa, blaADC-76, blaOXA-235, blaOXA-68, sul2, and tet(39). The described draft genomes will be useful in comparative genomic analyses of A. baumannii strains from different regions and clinical settings. These data can also provide phylogenetic insights into the emergence of XDR A. baumannii strains and support epidemiological investigations of outbreaks.

Data availability.

The complete genome sequences of A. baumannii CFSAN059604 (SRA number SRR8837010) and CFSAN059618 (SRA number SRR8837150) are available in GenBank under accession numbers SSMO00000000 and SSMN00000000, respectively (first versions).
  8 in total

1.  OXA-235, a novel class D β-lactamase involved in resistance to carbapenems in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Paul G Higgins; Francisco J Pérez-Llarena; Esther Zander; Ana Fernández; Germán Bou; Harald Seifert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Utilizing the Public GenomeTrakr Database for Foodborne Pathogen Traceback.

Authors:  Ruth E Timme; Maria Sanchez Leon; Marc W Allard
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

Review 3.  Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacteriaceae in South and Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Li-Yang Hsu; Anucha Apisarnthanarak; Erum Khan; Nuntra Suwantarat; Abdul Ghafur; Paul Anantharajah Tambyah
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  The population structure of Acinetobacter baumannii: expanding multiresistant clones from an ancestral susceptible genetic pool.

Authors:  Laure Diancourt; Virginie Passet; Alexandr Nemec; Lenie Dijkshoorn; Sylvain Brisse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen.

Authors:  Anton Y Peleg; Harald Seifert; David L Paterson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update.

Authors:  Enis Afgan; Dannon Baker; Bérénice Batut; Marius van den Beek; Dave Bouvier; Martin Cech; John Chilton; Dave Clements; Nate Coraor; Björn A Grüning; Aysam Guerler; Jennifer Hillman-Jackson; Saskia Hiltemann; Vahid Jalili; Helena Rasche; Nicola Soranzo; Jeremy Goecks; James Taylor; Anton Nekrutenko; Daniel Blankenberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments.

Authors:  Derrick E Wood; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline.

Authors:  Tatiana Tatusova; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Eric P Nawrocki; Leonid Zaslavsky; Alexandre Lomsadze; Kim D Pruitt; Mark Borodovsky; James Ostell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.