| Literature DB >> 32408599 |
András Szabó1,2, Omeralfaroug Ali2, Katalin Lóki2, Krisztián Balogh3, Miklós Mézes3, Tibor Bartók4, Levente Horváth4, Melinda Kovács1,2.
Abstract
Weaned piglets (n = 3 × 6) were fed 0, 15 and 30 mg/kg diet fumonisin (FB1, FB2 and FB3, i.e., FBs, a sphinganine analogue mycotoxin), from the age of 35 days for 21 days, to assess mycotoxin induced, dose-dependent changes in the red cells' membrane. Ouabain sensitive Na+/K+ ATPase activity was determined from lysed red cell membranes, membrane fatty acid (FA) profile was analysed, as well as antioxidant and lipid peroxidation endpoints. Final body weight was higher in the 30 mg/kg group (vs. control), even besides identical cumulative feed intake. After 3 weeks, there was a difference between control and the 30 mg/kg group in red cell membrane sodium pump activity; this change was dose-dependent (sig.: 0.036; R2 = 0.58). Membrane FA profile was strongly saturated with non-systematic inter-group differences; pooled data provided negative correlation with sodium pump activity (all individual membrane n6 FAs). Intracellular antioxidants (reduced glutathione and glutathione peroxidase) and lipid peroxidation indicators (conj. dienes, trienes and malondialdehyde) were non-responsive. We suppose a ceramide synthesis inhibitor (FB1) effect exerted onto the cell membrane, proven to be toxin dose-dependent and increasing sodium pump activity, with only indirect FA compositional correlations and lack of lipid peroxidation.Entities:
Keywords: fatty acids; fumonisins; membrane; oxidative stress; pig; red blood cell; sodium pump
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32408599 PMCID: PMC7290795 DOI: 10.3390/toxins12050318
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Somatic traits of the experimental and control piglet groups (n = 6/group; data are group means ± SD (standard deviation) of 6 individual data; different uppercase letters indicate significant difference of means at p ≤ 0.05. Between group differences were compared with one-way ANOVA and LSD “post hoc” test; BW: bodyweight).
| Group | Control | 15 mg/kg | 30 mg/kg | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Somatic Traits | Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | |||
| BW initial (g) | 12,980 | ± | 1720 | 13,800 | ± | 1200 | 13,800 | ± | 1340 | |||
| BW final (g) | 21,467 | ± | 1735 | a | 23,067 | ± | 1454 | ab | 23,367 | ± | 629 | b |
| cumulative feed intake (g) | 19,759 | ± | 2102 | 20,450 | ± | 1352 | 20,382 | ± | 1352 | |||
| lung (g) | 227.2 | ± | 45.0 | 237.1 | ± | 43.0 | 253.0 | ± | 70.0 | |||
| liver (g) | 527.4 | ± | 42.1 | 587.2 | ± | 56.9 | 563.0 | ± | 96.2 | |||
| kidney (g) | 84.1 | ± | 2.53 | 86.2 | ± | 6.83 | 79.4 | ± | 10.6 | |||
| pancreas (g) | 50.0 | ± | 6.39 | 57.1 | ± | 7.62 | 56.5 | ± | 9.81 | |||
| lung (% of BW) | 1.06 | ± | 0.20 | 1.03 | ± | 0.15 | 1.09 | ± | 0.30 | |||
| liver (% of BW) | 2.48 | ± | 0.38 | 2.55 | ± | 0.23 | 2.42 | ± | 0.45 | |||
| kindey (% of BW) | 0.39 | ± | 0.03 | b | 0.37 | ± | 0.04 | ab | 0.34 | ± | 0.05 | a |
| pancreas (% of BW) | 0.23 | ± | 0.04 | 0.25 | ± | 0.04 | 0.24 | ± | 0.04 | |||
Figure 1The total Na+/K+ ATPase activity of red cells of the experimental piglet groups (n = 6/group; columns represent group means ± SD of 6 individual data; different uppercase letters indicate significant difference of means at p ≤ 0.05. Between group differences were compared with one-way ANOVA and LSD “post hoc” test).
The red cell membrane fatty acid profile in the three piglet groups (n = 6/group; data are group means ± SD of 6 individual data; different uppercase indicate significant difference of means at p ≤ 0.05. Between group differences were compared with one-way ANOVA and LSD “post hoc” test; BW: bodyweight; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acid).
| Group | Control | 15 mg/kg | 30 mg/kg | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Cell Membrane FA Profile | Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | |||
| C12:0 | 0.04 | ± | 0.01 | b | 0.02 | ± | 0.01 | a | 0.02 | ± | 0.00 | ab |
| C14:0 | 0.52 | ± | 0.04 | 0.50 | ± | 0.03 | 0.52 | ± | 0.05 | |||
| C15:0 | 0.10 | ± | 0.05 | 0.14 | ± | 0.08 | 0.09 | ± | 0.02 | |||
| C16:0 | 43.6 | ± | 0.97 | ab | 42.6 | ± | 1.69 | a | 44.5 | ± | 1.33 | b |
| C16:1n7 | 0.08 | ± | 0.02 | 0.11 | ± | 0.04 | 0.09 | ± | 0.04 | |||
| C17:0 | 0.40 | ± | 0.12 | 0.59 | ± | 0.25 | 0.38 | ± | 0.05 | |||
| C18:0 | 48.7 | ± | 1.52 | 46.7 | ± | 2.86 | 48.8 | ± | 1.63 | |||
| C18:1n9c | 3.90 | ± | 1.64 | ab | 6.15 | ± | 2.68 | b | 2.99 | ± | 0.72 | a |
| C18:1n7 | 0.23 | ± | 0.10 | 0.33 | ± | 0.18 | 0.17 | ± | 0.03 | |||
| C18:2n6 | 0.96 | ± | 0.70 | 1.54 | ± | 1.29 | 0.37 | ± | 0.11 | |||
| C18:3n3 | 0.02 | ± | 0.00 | 0.02 | ± | 0.01 | 0.03 | ± | 0.00 | |||
| C20:0 | 0.45 | ± | 0.03 | 0.43 | ± | 0.05 | 0.43 | ± | 0.03 | |||
| C20:1n9 | 0.02 | ± | 0.00 | 0.02 | ± | 0.01 | 0.02 | ± | 0.00 | |||
| C20:2n6 | 0.02 | ± | 0.01 | 0.02 | ± | 0.01 | 0.01 | ± | 0.01 | |||
| C20:3n6 | 0.02 | ± | 0.01 | ab | 0.03 | ± | 0.02 | b | 0.01 | ± | 0.00 | a |
| C21:0 | 0.03 | ± | 0.02 | 0.03 | ± | 0.02 | 0.04 | ± | 0.02 | |||
| C20:4n6 | 0.25 | ± | 0.17 | ab | 0.46 | ± | 0.33 | b | 0.10 | ± | 0.04 | a |
| C22:0 | 0.07 | ± | 0.01 | 0.06 | ± | 0.01 | 0.06 | ± | 0.00 | |||
| C22:6n3 | 0.15 | ± | 0.05 | 0.18 | ± | 0.04 | 0.15 | ± | 0.06 | |||
| C24:1n9 | 0.08 | ± | 0.08 | 0.09 | ± | 0.08 | 0.08 | ± | 0.07 | |||
| Σ saturated | 93.1 | ± | 0.91 | ab | 91.0 | ± | 4.32 | a | 96.0 | ± | 0.94 | b |
| Σ unsaturated | 6.92 | ± | 0.91 | 8.95 | ± | 4.32 | 3.96 | ± | 0.94 | |||
| Σ MUFA | 5.32 | ± | 0.63 | ab | 6.70 | ± | 2.92 | b | 3.34 | ± | 0.78 | a |
| Σ PUFA | 1.40 | ± | 0.87 | 2.25 | ± | 1.68 | 0.63 | ± | 0.17 | |||
| Σ n3 | 0.15 | ± | 0.05 | 0.19 | ± | 0.05 | 0.16 | ± | 0.06 | |||
| Σ n6 | 1.25 | ± | 0.88 | 2.06 | ± | 1.64 | 0.49 | ± | 0.16 | |||
| Σ n6/Σ n3 | 9.38 | ± | 7.30 | 9.70 | ± | 6.59 | 3.77 | ± | 1.49 | |||
| Σ odd chain FA | 0.50 | ± | 0.17 | 0.72 | ± | 0.33 | 0.47 | ± | 0.06 | |||
Pearson correlation parameters between sodium pump activity and the fatty acid profile data. (Calculations were performed on pooled (i.e., 3 groups handled together as one, n = 18), individual data pairs were used for the analysis. Significance was set to p ≤ 0.05).
| Compound | Sig. | Pearson Corr. Coeff. |
|---|---|---|
| C18:2 n6 | 0.017 | −0.671 |
| C20:2 n6 | 0.001 | −0.821 |
| C20:3 n6 | 0.022 | −0.65 |
| C20:4 n6 | 0.023 | −0.648 |
| Σ PUFA | 0.012 | −0.697 |
| Σ n6 | 0.014 | −0.683 |
Figure 2The antioxidant and lipid peroxidation traits of the red cells of the experimental piglet groups (lack of different uppercase index letters represent the lack of significant difference at p < 0.05). (n = 6/group; columns represent group means ± SD of 6 individual data. Between group differences were compared with one-way ANOVA and LSD “post hoc” test).
Diet proximate composition of the piglets.
| Crude protein (%) | 17.50 |
| Crude fat (%) | 3.30 |
| Crude fiber (%) | 3.70 |
| Crude ash (%) | 5.00 |
| Lysine (g/kg) | 1.11 |
| Methionine (g/kg) | 0.37 |
| Ca (g/kg) | 0.65 |
| P (g/kg) | 0.50 |
| Na (g/kg) | 0.18 |
| DE (MJ/kg) | 14.70 |
| ME (MJ/kg) | 14.10 |