| Literature DB >> 32408472 |
Ae-Rim Seo1,2, Mi-Ji Kim1,2, Ki-Soo Park1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Adequate nutrition is an important factor to prevent sarcopenia in older adults. The purpose of this study was to identify the regional differences in the association between dietary pattern and muscle strength in older Korean adults.Entities:
Keywords: diet; elderly; grip strength; protein
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32408472 PMCID: PMC7284570 DOI: 10.3390/nu12051377
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flowchart of the study subjects.
Sociodemographic and health-related characteristics by residential areas.
| Characteristics | Total ( | Rural Area ( | Urban Area ( | Metropolitan Area ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Men | 980 (49.6) | 301 (48.0) | 293 (48.1) | 386 (51.8) | 0.386 |
| Women | 1085 (50.4) | 354 (52.0) | 336 (51.9) | 395 (48.2) | ||
| Age | 65–74 | 1230 (61.1) | 349 (53.3) | 372 (59.7) | 509 (66.9) | <0.001 |
| ≥75 | 835 (38.9) | 306 (46.7) | 257 (40.3) | 272 (33.1) | ||
| Marital status | Living alone | 689 (32.5) | 212 (32.7) | 217 (33.1) | 260 (32.0) | 0.921 |
| Living together | 1375 (67.5) | 442 (67.3) | 412 (66.9) | 521 (68.0) | ||
| Education | ≤Elementary school | 1155 (61.1) | 417 (72.0) | 353 (62.0) | 385 (53.9) | <0.001 |
| Middle school | 248 (13.2) | 70 (11.7) | 68 (11.8) | 110 (15.0) | ||
| High school | 270 (15.5) | 62 (12.2) | 94 (16.4) | 114 (16.8) | ||
| ≥College | 171 (10.2) | 20 (4.1) | 57 (9.8) | 94 (14.3) | ||
| Income | Low (quartile 1) | 552 (27.2) | 234 (37.1) | 139 (23.0) | 179 (24.1) | <0.001 |
| Low-medium (quartile 2) | 525 (24.4) | 182 (28.7) | 155 (23.3) | 188 (22.4) | ||
| High-medium (quartile 3) | 485 (22.3) | 128 (18.1) | 166 (25.7) | 191 (22.5) | ||
| High (quartile 4) | 487 (26.1) | 106(16.1) | 166 (28.0) | 215 (31.0) | ||
| Muscular exercise | <2 per week | 1541 (82.5) | 520 (90.8) | 472 (82.5) | 549 (77.3) | <0.001 |
| ≥2 days per week | 305 (17.5) | 52 (9.2) | 99 (17.5) | 154 (22.7) | ||
| Smoking status | Current smoking | 191 (11.3) | 49 (9.1) | 68 (12.7) | 74 (11.5) | 0.318 |
| Past/non smoking | 1719 (88.7) | 547 (90.9) | 515 (87.3) | 657(88.5) | ||
| High-risk drinking | No | 1833 (95.7) | 575 (96.4) | 567 (96.8) | 691 (94.4) | 0.146 |
| Yes | 81 (4.3) | 22 (3.6) | 18 (3.2) | 41 (5.6) | ||
| Hypertension | No | 958 (49.7) | 312 (51.1) | 280 (46.6) | 366 (51.1) | 0.012 |
| Yes | 956 (50.3) | 286 (48.9) | 310 (53.4) | 360 (48.9) | ||
| Diabetes mellitus | No | 1636 (85.1) | 525 (87.8) | 493 (82.3) | 618 (85.4) | 0.113 |
| Yes | 276 (14.9) | 72 (12.2) | 96 (17.7) | 108 (14.6) | ||
| Dyslipidemia | No | 1496 (77.6) | 504 (82.5) | 463 (78.6) | 529 (73.8) | 0.492 |
| Yes | 418 (22.4) | 94 (17.5) | 127 (21.4) | 197 (26.2) | ||
| Arthritis | No | 1386 (75.1) | 432 (72.9) | 427 (75.6) | 527 (76.0) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 482 (24.9) | 151 (27.1) | 149 (24.4) | 182 (24.0) | ||
| Body Mass Index (m2/kg), mean ± SD | 23.7 ± 0.1 | 23.6 ± 0.2 | 24.0 ± 0.2 | 23.7 ± 0.1 | 0.142 | |
Values are presented as numbers (%). p values were determined by chi-square test and complex sample general linear model (CSGLM).
Dietary patterns and grip strength by residential areas.
| Factors | Total ( | Rural Area ( | Urban Area ( | Metropolitan Area ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dietary patterns | Cluster One | 949 (45.9) | 243 (36.7) | 294 (43.8) | 412 (53.2) | <0.001 |
| Cluster Two | 271 (13.4) | 80 (12.9) | 91 (14.7) | 100 (12.9) | ||
| Cluster Three | 845 (40.6) | 332 (50.4) | 244 (41.5) | 269 (33.9) | ||
| Grip strength | Poor | 500 (24.0) | 186 (29.1) | 158 (25.6) | 156 (19.8) | 0.009 |
| Robust | 1565 (76.0) | 469 (70.9) | 471 (74.4) | 625 (80.2) | ||
Values are presented as numbers (%). p values were determined by chi-square test. Cluster One: diet dominant in fruits and fish; Cluster Two: diet dominant in meats; Cluster Three: diet dominant in white rice and kimchi.
Factors affecting grip strength.
| Factors | Model One | Model Two | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp (B) | 95.0% CI for Exp (B) | Exp (B) | 95.0% CI for Exp (B) | |||||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||
| Dietary pattern (reference: Cluster Three) | ||||||||
| Cluster One | 1.995 | 1.542 | 2.581 | <0.001 | 1.356 | 0.972 | 1.893 | 0.073 |
| Cluster Two | 2.677 | 1.816 | 3.944 | <0.001 | 1.601 | 1.000 | 2.563 | 0.050 |
| Residential area (reference: Metropolitan) | ||||||||
| Rural | 0.667 | 0.480 | 0.926 | 0.016 | 1.004 | 0.680 | 1.482 | 0.984 |
| Urban | 0.748 | 0.540 | 1.037 | 0.081 | 0.877 | 0.601 | 1.282 | 0.498 |
CI: confidence interval. p values were determined by complex sample multiple logistic regression analysis. Cluster One: diet dominant in fruits and fish; Cluster Two: diet dominant in meats; Cluster Three: diet dominant in white rice and kimchi. Model One was unadjusted, but, involved of dietary pattern and residential area together. Model Two was adjusted for gender (men = 1, women = 0), age (continuous), marital status (living alone = 1, living together = 0), education (≤elementary school = 3, middle school = 2, high school = 1, ≥college = 0), income (low = 3, low-medium = 2, high-medium = 1, high = 0), muscular exercise (no = 1, yes = 0), smoking status (current smoking = 1, past / non-smoking = 0), high-risk drinking (no = 1, yes = 0), hypertension (no = 1, yes = 0), diabetes mellitus (no = 1, yes = 0), dyslipidemia (no = 1, yes = 0), arthritis (no = 1, yes = 0), and body mass index (continuous).
Factors affecting grip strength by residential areas.
| Factors | Grip Strength (Reference: Poor) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rural area | Urban Area | Metropolitan Area | |||||||||||
| Exp (B) | 95.0% CI for Exp (B) | Exp (B) | 95.0% CI for Exp (B) | Exp (B) | 95.0% CI for Exp (B) | ||||||||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | ||||||||
| Model One | Dietary pattern (reference: Cluster Three) | ||||||||||||
| Cluster One | 1.555 | 0.963 | 2.510 | 0.071 | 2.063 | 1.349 | 3.156 | 0.001 | 2.398 | 1.572 | 3.659 | <0.001 | |
| Cluster Two | 1.668 | 0.914 | 3.044 | 0.096 | 1.869 | 1.004 | 3.478 | 0.049 | 8.610 | 3.738 | 19.835 | <0.001 | |
| Model Two | Dietary pattern (reference: Cluster Three) | ||||||||||||
| Cluster One | 0.948 | 0.544 | 1.650 | 0.849 | 1.248 | 0.709 | 2.197 | 0.441 | 1.987 | 1.135 | 3.479 | 0.016 | |
| Cluster Two | 0.994 | 0.444 | 2.227 | 0.989 | 1.035 | 0.506 | 2.119 | 0.925 | 4.671 | 1.701 | 12.827 | 0.003 | |
CI: confidence interval. P values were determined by complex sample multiple logistic regression analysis. Cluster One: diet dominant in fruits and fish; Cluster Two: diet dominant in meats; Cluster Three: diet dominant in white rice and kimchi. Model One was unadjusted. Model Two was adjusted for gender (men = 1, women = 0), age (continuous), marital status (living alone = 1, living together = 0), education (≤ elementary school = 3, middle school = 2, high school = 1, ≥ college = 0), income (low = 3, low-medium = 2, high-medium = 1, high = 0), muscular exercise (no = 1, yes = 0), smoking status (current smoking = 1, past / non-smoking = 0), high-risk drinking (no = 1, yes = 0), hypertension (no = 1, yes = 0), diabetes mellitus (no = 1, yes = 0), dyslipidemia (no = 1, yes = 0), arthritis (no = 1, yes = 0), and body mass index (continuous).