Literature DB >> 32408466

Transfer and transport of microplastics from biosolids to agricultural soils and the wider environment.

Jill Crossman1, Rachel R Hurley2, Martyn Futter3, Luca Nizzetto2.   

Abstract

Between April to November of 2017, microplastics (MPs) were analysed in biosolids from two separate suppliers, and in the soils of three agricultural fields to which they were applied, in Ontario, Canada. Soils of a control site with no history of biosolid application were also examined. High MP concentrations of between 8.7 × 103 MP kg-1 and 1.4 × 104 MP kg-1 were found in biosolids samples. Lower MP concentrations observed in Provider 2 biosolids may be due to storage, settling and supernatant removal prior to applications. Annual MP additions to agricultural soils across Ontario were estimated at between 4.1 × 1011 and 1.3 × 1012 particles. All fields receiving biosolids had higher soil pre-treatment MP concentrations than the control. The field with the greatest number of previous biosolid treatments had the highest pre-treatment soil MP concentrations; suggesting some MP retention in soils between applications. Immediately following biosolids applications, two fields demonstrated significant increases in soil MP concentrations, with preferential retention of MP fibers over fragments observed, while a reduction in soil MP concentrations were observed in the third. Surprisingly, only one field demonstrated a net gain in soil MPs over the course of the study. At all three fields, >99% of MPs applied in biosolids in 2017 were unaccounted for. The study suggests that despite adhering to applicable legislation, biosolids applications at all sites likely result in high rates of MP export. This study is the first to track MP transport through soils following their application in biosolids, and contributes to filling current knowledge gaps regarding export of MPs to aquatic systems from the terrestrial environment.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agriculture; Aquatic; Biosolids; Export; Management; Microplastics; Soil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32408466     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Constraining the atmospheric limb of the plastic cycle.

Authors:  Janice Brahney; Natalie Mahowald; Marje Prank; Gavin Cornwell; Zbigniew Klimont; Hitoshi Matsui; Kimberly Ann Prather
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Microplastic Contamination in Soils: A Review from Geotechnical Engineering View.

Authors:  Mehmet Murat Monkul; Hakkı O Özhan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 3.  Occurrence, toxicity and remediation of polyethylene terephthalate plastics. A review.

Authors:  Vaishali Dhaka; Simranjeet Singh; Amith G Anil; T S Sunil Kumar Naik; Shashank Garg; Jastin Samuel; Manoj Kumar; Praveen C Ramamurthy; Joginder Singh
Journal:  Environ Chem Lett       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 13.615

4.  Chronic toxic effects of polystyrene microplastics on reproductive parameters of male rats.

Authors:  Ifenna Ilechukwu; Ben Enoluomen Ehigiator; Inemesit Okon Ben; Chinedu Joseph Okonkwo; Oluwakemi S Olorunfemi; Uchechukwu Emmanuel Modo; Chibuamam Ezinwanneamaka Ilechukwu; Ngozika Juliet Ohagwa
Journal:  Environ Anal Health Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-15

5.  Bypass of Booming Inputs of Urban and Sludge-Derived Microplastics in a Large Nordic Lake.

Authors:  François Clayer; Morten Jartun; Nina T Buenaventura; Jose-Luis Guerrero; Amy Lusher
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.