OBJECTIVES: Although the majority of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), significant heterogeneity in clinical response is observed which might be attributed to the distinct sub-molecular characteristics. The present study aims to identify genetic alterations correlated with clinical outcomes and treatment response to different EGFR-TKI inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We integrated the genomic data and clinical outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 179 patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were treated with EGFR-TKI as 1st line of treatment. RESULTS: We found that EGFR-mutant patients harboring concomitant TP53 mutation (OS: 21 vs. 40 months, P = 0.05), ERBB2 amplification (PFS: 6.1 vs. 12.5 months, P = 0.01) or FGF19 amplification (OS: 11.2 vs. 27.1 months, P = 0.01) were significantly associated with a poorer clinical prognosis after treated with 1st generation EGFR-TKI. In contrast, the presence of TP53 mutation did not affect the PFS nor OS of patients treated with 2nd generation EGFR-TKI. Furthermore, EGFR-mutant and TP53-wild type (WT) patients benefited more from a combinatorial treatment consisting of EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab comparing to EGFR-TKI as a single agent (PFS: 21.7 vs. 9.3 months, P < 0.01). Copy number variation (CNV) (PFS: 4.6 vs.9.4 months, p = 0.018) was identified as an unfavorable predictive factor to 3rd-generation TKI. We also revealed distinct resistance mechanisms associated with different EGFR-TKIs. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the heterogeneity both in the primary molecular landscape and acquired alterations in EGFR-mutated NSCLCs, which might play a role in determining the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs. We also revealed the differential prognostic role of TP53 mutation in patients treated with the 1st or 2nd generation of EGFR-TKI. Our study also suggests that EGFR-mutant and TP53-WT patients may benefit more from combinatorial treatment consisting of EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab, highlighting the importance of further stratifying EGFR-mutant patients.
OBJECTIVES: Although the majority of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), significant heterogeneity in clinical response is observed which might be attributed to the distinct sub-molecular characteristics. The present study aims to identify genetic alterations correlated with clinical outcomes and treatment response to different EGFR-TKI inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We integrated the genomic data and clinical outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 179 patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were treated with EGFR-TKI as 1st line of treatment. RESULTS: We found that EGFR-mutant patients harboring concomitant TP53 mutation (OS: 21 vs. 40 months, P = 0.05), ERBB2 amplification (PFS: 6.1 vs. 12.5 months, P = 0.01) or FGF19 amplification (OS: 11.2 vs. 27.1 months, P = 0.01) were significantly associated with a poorer clinical prognosis after treated with 1st generation EGFR-TKI. In contrast, the presence of TP53 mutation did not affect the PFS nor OS of patients treated with 2nd generation EGFR-TKI. Furthermore, EGFR-mutant and TP53-wild type (WT) patients benefited more from a combinatorial treatment consisting of EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab comparing to EGFR-TKI as a single agent (PFS: 21.7 vs. 9.3 months, P < 0.01). Copy number variation (CNV) (PFS: 4.6 vs.9.4 months, p = 0.018) was identified as an unfavorable predictive factor to 3rd-generation TKI. We also revealed distinct resistance mechanisms associated with different EGFR-TKIs. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the heterogeneity both in the primary molecular landscape and acquired alterations in EGFR-mutated NSCLCs, which might play a role in determining the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs. We also revealed the differential prognostic role of TP53 mutation in patients treated with the 1st or 2nd generation of EGFR-TKI. Our study also suggests that EGFR-mutant and TP53-WT patients may benefit more from combinatorial treatment consisting of EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab, highlighting the importance of further stratifying EGFR-mutant patients.