Literature DB >> 32407814

Reply to: 'NAFLD or comorbidities, that is the question'.

Dong Ji1, Dawei Zhang1, George Lau2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32407814      PMCID: PMC7215167          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: We thank Ponziani et al. for their interest in our manuscript and for their thoughtful comments. They raised the concern that the 37.6% prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in our cohorts was rather high compared to the 26.9% reported in Northeastern China and suggested that we may have over-diagnosed NAFLD. If NAFLD was over-diagnosed, the prevalence should be similar in the stable and progressive groups, as opposed to the marked difference, 25.8% vs. 87.2 %, respectively, observed in our study. Secondly, the 2 hospitals in our study are in Anhui (Eastern China) and Beijing (Northern China), not in Northeastern China (Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang provinces), therefore using the 27.6% prevalence might not be relevant. We agree that hepatic steatosis index (HIS) is affected by inflammatory activities. To reduce over-diagnoses, we used the lowest alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) value from the medical records of the patients in the preceding 12 months before the COVID-19 diagnosis. If the patient had no ALT/AST records in the preceding 12 months, the lowest value during the current admission and follow-up was used to calculate HSI. Also, the mean AST and ALT values were not significantly different between the stable and progressive groups. If inflammation led to elevation of transaminases and subsequently over diagnosis of HIS as suggested, again it should affect both the stable and progressive groups equally. In our cohort, 6/202 (3%) of patients fulfilled the criteria of excessive alcohol intake (≥30 g/d for man and ≥20 g/d for women), with 5/163(3.1%) and 1/39 (2.6%) in the stable and progressive groups, respectively (p = 1.000), as shown in Table 1. Only 2/76 (2.6%) patients with excessive alcohol intake had NAFLD, and 4/126 (3.2%) with excessive alcohol intake did not have NAFLD (p = 1.000). Nonetheless, we acknowledge the limitation of non-invasive assessment of NAFLD. However, with the priority concern being the safety of the medical staff and the patients with COVID-19, further non-invasive or invasive assessments (such as liver biopsy) were not undertaken. In the near future, we hope that efforts to create a “big data” collection, such as the “APCOLIS” study (APASL Covid Liver Injury Spectrum) (https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/covid-liver) will enhance our understanding of the role of NAFLD/MAFLD in COVID-19. Though HIV infection was defined as a comorbidity, none of the patients in our cohort had positive HIV serology or documented HIV infection in the past. Fig. 1 showed that after multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.1; 95% CI 1.1–9.4), age >60 years (OR 4.8; 95% CI 1.5–16.2), higher BMI (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0–1.8), underlying comorbidity (OR 6.3; 95% CI 2.3–18.8) and NAFLD (OR 6.4; 95% CI 1.5–31.2) were associated with progression of illness.
Fig. 1

Risk factors related to development of progressive COVID-19 by multivariate analysis.

The solid box represents OR of multivariate Logistic regression, the thin black solid segment represents 95% CIs. The vertical line represents invalid line. BMI, body mass index; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; OR, odds ratio.

Risk factors related to development of progressive COVID-19 by multivariate analysis. The solid box represents OR of multivariate Logistic regression, the thin black solid segment represents 95% CIs. The vertical line represents invalid line. BMI, body mass index; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; OR, odds ratio.

Financial support

This work is funded by the Capital Characteristic Clinic Project of (Z181100001718034).

Authors' contributions

DJ and DZ wrote the manuscript; GL provided guidance and proof-read the manuscript; all authors revised and approved the final version.

Conflict of interest

We declare no competing interests. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.
  5 in total

1.  Unexpected Rapid Increase in the Burden of NAFLD in China From 2008 to 2018: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Feng Zhou; Jianghua Zhou; Wenxin Wang; Xiao-Jing Zhang; Yan-Xiao Ji; Peng Zhang; Zhi-Gang She; Lihua Zhu; Jingjing Cai; Hongliang Li
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 2.  Non-invasive assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Clinical prediction rules and blood-based biomarkers.

Authors:  Eduardo Vilar-Gomez; Naga Chalasani
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  Clinical practice guidance for hepatology and liver transplant providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: APASL expert panel consensus recommendations.

Authors:  George Lau; Manoj Sharma
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 6.047

4.  Non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases in patients with COVID-19: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Dong Ji; Enqiang Qin; Jing Xu; Dawei Zhang; Gregory Cheng; Yudong Wang; George Lau
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 25.083

5.  NAFLD or comorbidities, that is the question.

Authors:  Francesca Romana Ponziani; Antonio Gasbarrini; Maurizio Pompili
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 25.083

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.