AIMS: The aim of the present work is to analyze the safety profile, effectiveness, and favorable and unfavorable predictors of clinical outcome in urethral bulking with Bulkamid, and to better identify the ideal candidate for the procedure. METHODS: We included all consecutive female patients treated with urethral bulking with Bulkamid at our institution within 2 years. Patients were affected by stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or mixed incontinence. Incontinence severity was classified as "mild" (urinary leakage <50 g/die), "moderate" (50-200 g/die), or "severe" (>200 g/die) at 24-hours pad test. Clinical success was defined as "dry" (no pads); clinical failure included "partial improvement" (>50% 24-hours pad test reduction) and "no benefit" (<50% 24-hours pad test reduction). The χ2 and Mann-Whitney tests were performed to assess the predictors of clinical outcome. RESULTS: The success rate was 36.1% (n = 35). Forty-three patients (44.3%) reported continence improvement. Complications included eight urinary retention cases (8.2%). Statistically significant correlation was observed between incontinence severity and clinical outcome in thee χ2 test (P = .008). No significant correlation was found between functional outcome and urodynamic incontinence features, postoperative urinary retention, previous pelvic surgery, age, and other physiological, pathological, and urodynamics characteristics. Urinary retention following the surgical procedure appeared to be related to clinical success with nonsignificant P value (P = .10). CONCLUSIONS: Bulkamid procedure could be proposed with good results in elderly patients or in patients requiring a low-invasive procedure with low risk of complications, affected either by SUI or mixed incontinence and with mild to moderate incontinence. Previous training to clean intermittent self-catheterization maneuver should be performed.
AIMS: The aim of the present work is to analyze the safety profile, effectiveness, and favorable and unfavorable predictors of clinical outcome in urethral bulking with Bulkamid, and to better identify the ideal candidate for the procedure. METHODS: We included all consecutive female patients treated with urethral bulking with Bulkamid at our institution within 2 years. Patients were affected by stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or mixed incontinence. Incontinence severity was classified as "mild" (urinary leakage <50 g/die), "moderate" (50-200 g/die), or "severe" (>200 g/die) at 24-hours pad test. Clinical success was defined as "dry" (no pads); clinical failure included "partial improvement" (>50% 24-hours pad test reduction) and "no benefit" (<50% 24-hours pad test reduction). The χ2 and Mann-Whitney tests were performed to assess the predictors of clinical outcome. RESULTS: The success rate was 36.1% (n = 35). Forty-three patients (44.3%) reported continence improvement. Complications included eight urinary retention cases (8.2%). Statistically significant correlation was observed between incontinence severity and clinical outcome in thee χ2 test (P = .008). No significant correlation was found between functional outcome and urodynamic incontinence features, postoperative urinary retention, previous pelvic surgery, age, and other physiological, pathological, and urodynamics characteristics. Urinary retention following the surgical procedure appeared to be related to clinical success with nonsignificant P value (P = .10). CONCLUSIONS:Bulkamid procedure could be proposed with good results in elderly patients or in patients requiring a low-invasive procedure with low risk of complications, affected either by SUI or mixed incontinence and with mild to moderate incontinence. Previous training to clean intermittent self-catheterization maneuver should be performed.
Authors: Samra Jasarevic; Doroteja Jankovic; Georg C Hutterer; Regina Riedl; Georg P Pichler; Karl Pummer; Günter Primus Journal: Urol Int Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 2.089