Shingo Miyamoto1, Koichi Azuma2, Hidenobu Ishii2, Akihiro Bessho3, Shinobu Hosokawa3, Nobuaki Fukamatsu3, Hideo Kunitoh1, Mari Ishii4, Hiroshi Tanaka5, Hiromi Aono6, Yoshiro Nakahara7, Kei Kusaka8, Yukio Hosomi9, Norihiro Kikuchi10, Yoshiaki Mori11, Hidetoshi Itani12, Akinobu Hamada13, Kazuhiko Yamada2, Hiroaki Okamoto4. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Division of Respirology, Neurology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan. 3. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Okayama Hospital, Okayama, Japan. 4. Department of Respiratory Medicine and Medical Oncology, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Japan. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan. 6. Respiratory Medicine, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 7. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan. 8. The Center for Pulmonary Diseases, National Hospital Organization Tokyo National Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 9. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 10. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kasumigaura Medical Center, Tsuchiura, Japan. 11. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital, Morioka, Japan. 12. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Ise Hospital, Ise, Japan. 13. Division of Molecular Pharmacology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
Importance: Although the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for EGFR gene mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer is well established, optimal dosing remains to be established, especially in elderly or frail patients. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose erlotinib in elderly or frail patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Single-arm phase 2 trial with the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 2-stage design that enrolled frail patients from 21 Japanese institutions after meeting the inclusion criteria. Chemotherapy-naive patients with EGFR-activating mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer who were considered frail based on age, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were eligible for the study. Interventions: Patients were initially administered 50 mg/d erlotinib for 4 weeks, which was modified based on response or adverse events. Dose increase was permitted for patients with stable disease after 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the independent review committee-confirmed objective response rate (ORR) at the dose of 50 mg/d. The study also evaluated the pharmacokinetics of low-dose erlotinib and influence of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled, with a median (range) age of 80 (49-90) years; 54 (68%) were men. An independent review committee confirmed a significant ORR of 60.0% (90% CI, 50.2%-69.2%). The disease control rate was 90.0% (90% CI, 82.7%-94.9%), median progression-free survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.2-11.4 months), and median overall survival was 26.2 months (95% CI, 21.9-30.4 months). Mild adverse events were observed in some participants, with few patients exhibiting grade 3 or greater adverse events. Low-dose erlotinib treatment was temporarily suspended for 10 patients owing to adverse events. Five of 80 patients (6%) had their erlotinib dose reduced to 25 mg because of oral mucositis, paronychia, erythema multiforme, diarrhea, and anorexia. Two patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (cutaneous ulcer and bone infection, and oral mucositis, respectively). There were no cases of interstitial lung disease or treatment-related deaths. The median (range) erlotinib plasma concentration was measured at 685 (153-1950) ng/mL. Seventy-three patients discontinued study treatment owing to disease progression (n = 60), death (n = 3), AEs (n = 4), and patient requests (n = 6). No clear association was observed between the pharmacokinetics of low-dose erlotinib and the treatment outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Low-dose erlotinib appears to be safe and effective in elderly or frail patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer and can be a valid treatment option. Trial Registration: UMIN-CTR Identifier: UMIN000015949.
Importance: Although the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for EGFR gene mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer is well established, optimal dosing remains to be established, especially in elderly or frail patients. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose erlotinib in elderly or frail patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Single-arm phase 2 trial with the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 2-stage design that enrolled frail patients from 21 Japanese institutions after meeting the inclusion criteria. Chemotherapy-naive patients with EGFR-activating mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer who were considered frail based on age, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were eligible for the study. Interventions: Patients were initially administered 50 mg/d erlotinib for 4 weeks, which was modified based on response or adverse events. Dose increase was permitted for patients with stable disease after 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the independent review committee-confirmed objective response rate (ORR) at the dose of 50 mg/d. The study also evaluated the pharmacokinetics of low-dose erlotinib and influence of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled, with a median (range) age of 80 (49-90) years; 54 (68%) were men. An independent review committee confirmed a significant ORR of 60.0% (90% CI, 50.2%-69.2%). The disease control rate was 90.0% (90% CI, 82.7%-94.9%), median progression-free survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.2-11.4 months), and median overall survival was 26.2 months (95% CI, 21.9-30.4 months). Mild adverse events were observed in some participants, with few patients exhibiting grade 3 or greater adverse events. Low-dose erlotinib treatment was temporarily suspended for 10 patients owing to adverse events. Five of 80 patients (6%) had their erlotinib dose reduced to 25 mg because of oral mucositis, paronychia, erythema multiforme, diarrhea, and anorexia. Two patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (cutaneous ulcer and bone infection, and oral mucositis, respectively). There were no cases of interstitial lung disease or treatment-related deaths. The median (range) erlotinib plasma concentration was measured at 685 (153-1950) ng/mL. Seventy-three patients discontinued study treatment owing to disease progression (n = 60), death (n = 3), AEs (n = 4), and patient requests (n = 6). No clear association was observed between the pharmacokinetics of low-dose erlotinib and the treatment outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Low-dose erlotinib appears to be safe and effective in elderly or frail patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer and can be a valid treatment option. Trial Registration: UMIN-CTR Identifier: UMIN000015949.
Authors: M Hidalgo; L L Siu; J Nemunaitis; J Rizzo; L A Hammond; C Takimoto; S G Eckhardt; A Tolcher; C D Britten; L Denis; K Ferrante; D D Von Hoff; S Silberman; E K Rowinsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kim A Reiss; Shun Yu; Ronac Mamtani; Rajni Mehta; Kathryn D'Addeo; E Paul Wileyto; Tamar H Taddei; David E Kaplan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Supriya G Mohile; William Dale; Mark R Somerfield; Mara A Schonberg; Cynthia M Boyd; Peggy S Burhenn; Beverly Canin; Harvey Jay Cohen; Holly M Holmes; Judith O Hopkins; Michelle C Janelsins; Alok A Khorana; Heidi D Klepin; Stuart M Lichtman; Karen M Mustian; William P Tew; Arti Hurria Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Benjamin D Smith; Grace L Smith; Arti Hurria; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Thomas A Buchholz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-04-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lecia V Sequist; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Kenneth O'Byrne; Vera Hirsh; Tony Mok; Sarayut Lucien Geater; Sergey Orlov; Chun-Ming Tsai; Michael Boyer; Wu-Chou Su; Jaafar Bennouna; Terufumi Kato; Vera Gorbunova; Ki Hyeong Lee; Riyaz Shah; Dan Massey; Victoria Zazulina; Mehdi Shahidi; Martin Schuler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: René J Boosman; Jacobus A Burgers; Egbert F Smit; Neeltje Steeghs; Anthonie J van der Wekken; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema; Rob Ter Heine Journal: Drugs Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Tina Lamy; Bastien Cabarrou; David Planchard; Xavier Quantin; Sophie Schneider; Michael Bringuier; Benjamin Besse; Nicolas Girard; Christos Chouaid; Thomas Filleron; Gaëtane Simon; Capucine Baldini Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Moamen A Hassanin; Muhamad Mustafa; Mohammed A S Abourehab; Heba A Hassan; Omar M Aly; Eman A M Beshr Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2022-07-12