Literature DB >> 32406246

Arthroscopic Matrix-Encapsulated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: A Pilot Multicenter Investigation in Latin America.

Enrique Villalobos1, Antonio Madrazo-Ibarra2, Valentín Martínez1, Anell Olivos-Meza1, Cristina Velasquillo1, Socorro Cortés González1, Aldo Izaguirre3, Carmina Ortega-Sánchez1, Ricardo González1, Carmen Parra-Cid1, Francisco Javier Pérez-Jiménez1, Clemente Ibarra1.   

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate minimum biosecurity parameters (MBP) for arthroscopic matrix-encapsulated autologous chondrocyte implantation (AMECI) based on patients' clinical outcomes, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2-mapping, Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score, and International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) second-look arthroscopic evaluation, laying the basis for a future multicenter study. Design. Pilot clinical study. We analyzed the logistics to perform AMECI to treat focal chondral lesions in different hospitals following strict biosecurity parameters related to tissue and construct transportation, chondrocyte isolation, and cell expansion. Patient progress was analyzed with patient-reported outcome measures, MRI T2-mapping, MOCART, and ICRS arthroscopic second-look evaluation. Results. Thirty-five lesions in 30 patients treated in 7 different hospitals were evaluated. Cell viability before implantation was >90%. Cell viability in construct remnants was 87% ± 11% at 24 hours, 75% ± 17.1% at 48 hours, and 60% ± 8% at 72 hours after implantation. Mean final follow-up was 37 months (12-72 months). Patients showed statistically significant improvement in all clinical scores and MOCART evaluations. MRI T2-mapping evaluation showed significant decrease in relaxation time from 61.2 ± 14.3 to 42.9 ± 7.2 ms (P < 0.05). Arthroscopic second-look evaluation showed grade II "near normal" tissue in 83% of patients. Two treatment failures were documented. Conclusions. It was feasible to perform AMECI in 7 different institutions in a large metropolitan area following our biosecurity measures without any implant-related complication. Treated patients showed improvement in clinical, MRI T2-mapping, and MOCART scores, as well as a low failure rate and a favorable ICRS arthroscopic evaluation at a mid-term follow-up. Level of Evidence. 2b.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMECI; T2-mapping; biosecurity parameters; matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation; multicenter study

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32406246      PMCID: PMC8808946          DOI: 10.1177/1947603520918630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   3.117


  35 in total

1.  Matrix-encapsulation cell-seeding technique to prevent cell detachment during arthroscopic implantation of matrix-induced autologous chondrocytes.

Authors:  Maria Masri; Germán Lombardero; Cristina Velasquillo; Valentín Martínez; Rosario Neri; Hilda Villegas; Clemente Ibarra
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Graft maturation of autologous chondrocyte implantation: magnetic resonance investigation with T2 mapping.

Authors:  Thomas R Niethammer; Elem Safi; Andreas Ficklscherer; Annie Horng; Markus Feist; Isa Feist-Pagenstert; Volkmar Jansson; Matthias F Pietschmann; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials.

Authors:  D Schwartz; J Lellouch
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1967-08

Review 4.  Failures and Reoperations After Matrix-Assisted Cartilage Repair of the Knee: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  James D Wylie; Melissa K Hartley; Ashley L Kapron; Stephen K Aoki; Travis G Maak
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Articular cartilage engineering with Hyalograft C: 3-year clinical results.

Authors:  Maurilio Marcacci; Massimo Berruto; Domenico Brocchetta; Antonio Delcogliano; Diego Ghinelli; Alberto Gobbi; Elisaveta Kon; Luigi Pederzini; Donato Rosa; Gian Luigi Sacchetti; Giacomo Stefani; Stefano Zanasi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Defect type, localization and marker gene expression determines early adverse events of matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation.

Authors:  Peter Angele; Juergen Fritz; Dirk Albrecht; Jason Koh; Johannes Zellner
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Microfracture: Its History and Experience of the Developing Surgeon.

Authors:  J Richard Steadman; William G Rodkey; Karen K Briggs
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 8.  Introduction of a pilot study.

Authors:  Junyong In
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-11-14

9.  Matrix assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation for cartilage treatment: A systematic review.

Authors:  E Kon; G Filardo; B Di Matteo; F Perdisa; M Marcacci
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Failures, Reoperations, and Improvement in Knee Symptoms Following Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Comparative Trials.

Authors:  Joshua S Everhart; Eric X Jiang; Sarah G Poland; Amy Du; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.