C Gibbons1, D Coyle1, C White2, E Aldridge1, M Doyle1, S Cascio3,4. 1. Children's Health Ireland at Temple Street, Dublin, Ireland. 2. Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Ireland. 3. Children's Health Ireland at Temple Street, Dublin, Ireland. salvatorecascio@doctors.org.uk. 4. University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. salvatorecascio@doctors.org.uk.
Abstract
AIM: To compare the quality of life (QoL) in children with spina bifida with a control group of their peers using a validated questionnaire, the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS). METHODS: The NBDS questionnaire was prospectively distributed to children attending a multi-disciplinary Spina Bifida clinic and healthy controls attending pediatric urology clinics. A score (out of 41) was assigned to each child based on their responses to the validated questionnaire. A lower score indicates better bowel function-related quality of life. SPSS software (v.25) was used for all statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were 98 respondents to the questionnaire, 48 children with spina bifida and 50 controls. The average age of respondents was 7.88 years (3-16 years). Of those with Spina Bifida, 33 (69%) were on retrograde rectal irrigations, [19 (58%) Peristeen® system, 11 (33%) tube rectal irrigations, and 3 (9%) Willis system], 6 (12%) were on laxatives, and 9 (19%) were on no treatment. The median NBDS for Spina Bifida patients was significantly higher 13.5 (2-32) compared to the control group 2 (0-26, p < 0.001). Amongst Spina Bifida patients, there was no difference in quality of life between the modalities of bowel management (p = 0.203). CONCLUSIONS: Despite active bowel management, children with spina bifida report a worse quality of life compared to the control group. In those with spina bifida, the lack of a difference between various bowel management strategies, including no treatment, indicates the need for a longitudinal study to evaluate the basis for this unexpected finding.
AIM: To compare the quality of life (QoL) in children with spina bifida with a control group of their peers using a validated questionnaire, the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS). METHODS: The NBDS questionnaire was prospectively distributed to children attending a multi-disciplinary Spina Bifida clinic and healthy controls attending pediatric urology clinics. A score (out of 41) was assigned to each child based on their responses to the validated questionnaire. A lower score indicates better bowel function-related quality of life. SPSS software (v.25) was used for all statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were 98 respondents to the questionnaire, 48 children with spina bifida and 50 controls. The average age of respondents was 7.88 years (3-16 years). Of those with Spina Bifida, 33 (69%) were on retrograde rectal irrigations, [19 (58%) Peristeen® system, 11 (33%) tube rectal irrigations, and 3 (9%) Willis system], 6 (12%) were on laxatives, and 9 (19%) were on no treatment. The median NBDS for Spina Bifida patients was significantly higher 13.5 (2-32) compared to the control group 2 (0-26, p < 0.001). Amongst Spina Bifida patients, there was no difference in quality of life between the modalities of bowel management (p = 0.203). CONCLUSIONS: Despite active bowel management, children with spina bifida report a worse quality of life compared to the control group. In those with spina bifida, the lack of a difference between various bowel management strategies, including no treatment, indicates the need for a longitudinal study to evaluate the basis for this unexpected finding.