| Literature DB >> 32405383 |
Yanru Hou1, Lin Su1, Rina Su1, Yulong Luo1, Bohui Wang1, Duo Yao1, Lihua Zhao1, Ye Jin1.
Abstract
The effects of two feeding regimens on meat quality, myosin heavy chain (MyHC) types, and key factors regulating muscle fiber type (AMP-activated protein kinase [AMPK] and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-coactivator-1α [PGC-1α]) in the biceps femoris muscle of Mongolia sheep were investigated. A total of 20 Mongolia sheep were weaning for 90 days and divided into two groups (pasture group (P) and confinement group (C)) at 10.36 ± 0.35 kg of weaning weight. After weaning, sheep were pasture fed or confinement fed for 9 months. The results showed that live weights, carcass weight, intramuscular fat (IMF), and Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) in P group were significantly lower (p < .05) than that in C group. Compared with P group, color evaluations with respect to L* and b* values were significantly higher (p < .05) in C group. Expression of the MyHC I gene in the P group was significantly higher, while MyHC IIa and MyHC IIb genes expression was significantly lower (p < .05) than that in C group. Also, AMPK activity and expression of AMPKα2 and PGC-1α genes were significantly higher (p < .05) in P group compared with C group. The present study indicated that muscle fiber composition was one of the key differences leading to the differences of meat quality in different feeding regimens. AMPK, particularly AMPKα2, and PGC-1α were considered to be two key factors regulating muscle fiber types in Mongolia sheep. The results support that AMPK activity and the expression of AMPKα2 and PGC-1α genes may affect the composition of muscle fibers; thus, AMPK activity and the expression of AMPKα2 and PGC-1α genes had an effect on meat quality by changed composition of muscle fibers.Entities:
Keywords: AMP‐activated protein kinase; feeding regimens; meat quality; myosin heavy chain isoforms; peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐coactivator‐1α
Year: 2020 PMID: 32405383 PMCID: PMC7215223 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Primer sequences for RT‐PCR
| Gene | Primers | Amplicon (bp) | Accession number |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMPKα1 |
F: TCCGAAGTATTGATGATGA R: ACAGATGAGGTAAGAGAAG | 154 | XM_004017019.2 |
| AMPKα2 |
F: ATGAGGTGGTGGAGCAGAGG R: CGTGAGAGAGCCAGAGAGTGAA | 131 | EU_131097.1 |
| AMPKγ3 |
F: GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT R: CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG | 127 | EU_477214.1 |
| PGC‐1α |
F: TGCTGCTCTGGTTGGTGAAG R: TGAAGGCTCGTTGTTGTACTGATT R:GGAGGAGTCGTGGGAGGAG | 166 | XM_012179735.2 |
| MyHC I |
F: AAGAACCTGCTGCGGCTG R: CCAAGATGTGGCACGGCT | 250 | XM_012129251.1 |
| MyHC Ila |
F: GAGGAACAATCCAATACAAATCTATCT R: CCCATAGCATCAGGACACGA | 173 | XM_015098655.1 |
| MyHC IIb |
F: GACAACTCCTCTCGCTTTGG R: GGACTGTGATCTCCCCTTGA | 274 | XM_004012706.3 |
| MyHC IIx |
F: GGAGGAACAATCCAATGTCAAC R: GTCACTTTTTAGCATTTGGATGAGTTA | 178 | XM_012114332.2 |
| GAPDH |
F: CTCAAGGGCATTCTAGGCTACACT R: GACCATGAGGTCCACCACCCTGT | 180 | NM_001190390.1 |
Effect of feeding regimen on meat quality in Mongolia sheep (n = 10)
| P group | C group | |
|---|---|---|
| Live weight (kg) | 37.95 ± 2.25b | 46.86 ± 1.72a |
| Carcass weight(kg) | 16.85 ± 1.22b | 23.56 ± 2.51a |
| L* | 27.83 ± 2.41a | 24.74 ± 2.33b |
| a* | 20.73 ± 1.76a | 19.33 ± 3.28a |
| b* | 7.34 ± 1.58a | 3.93 ± 1.57b |
| pH0 | 6.35 ± 0.09a | 6.56 ± 0.10a |
| pH24 | 5.71 ± 0.08a | 5.77 ± 0.07a |
| WBSF (kg/cm2) | 45.47 ± 6.73b | 52.90 ± 5.98a |
| Intramuscular fat (%) | 4.25 ± 0.56b | 6.57 ± 0.62a |
| Moisture (%) | 74.11 ± 6.89a | 72.21 ± 3.21a |
| Protein (%) | 22.23 ± 1.32a | 21.59 ± 1.02a |
| Ash (%) | 1.01 ± 0.06a | 1.06 ± 0.09a |
Values in rows followed by different letters are significantly different (p < .05).
Abbreviation: WBSF, Warner–Bratzler shear force.
Figure 1Gene expression of MyHC isoforms in P and C groups (n = 10). Columns with different letters for the same isoform are significantly different (p < .05)
Figure 2The level of p‐AMPK in P and C groups (n = 10). Columns with different letters for the same subunit are significantly different (p < .05)
Figure 3Gene expression of AMPK subunits and PGC‐1α in P and C groups (n = 10). Columns with different letters for the same subunit are significantly different