Literature DB >> 32405137

Prone positioning and high-flow oxygen improved respiratory function in a 25-week pregnant woman with COVID-19.

Florence Vibert1, Mathilda Kretz2, Vincent Thuet3, Florian Barthel4, Fanny De Marcillac5, Philippe Deruelle6, Lise Lecointre7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32405137      PMCID: PMC7219373          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, we found that prone positioning (PP) without sedation or invasive ventilation was efficient to manage COVID-19 infection in a 25-week pregnant woman. This 21-year-old Caucasian multipara (G7P5) without known comorbidities presented to the obstetrics department in her 23rd week of gestation and seven days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. On admission, the patient had fever and normal respiratory parameters while breathing ambient air. Testing for SARS-CoV-2 on nasopharyngeal swab was negative but computed tomography (CT) found typical COVID-19 lesions representing 20–30 % of the lung surface. On day 10, the patient was drowsy, and her SatO2 dropped; administration of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) at 30 L per minute (fraction of inspired oxygen 100 %) and alternating with standard oxygen at 5 L per minute was started. On day 11, the patient’s respiratory state worsened, and her SatO2 was at 94 % over 5 L of oxygen per minute. Clinical evaluation revealed tachypnea and tachycardia. Blood gas analysis results remained reassuring without acidosis. The patient was transferred to the ICU for surveillance. The patient’s respiratory state improved by positional therapy that alternated PP with lateralization. Oxygen saturation increased while the HFNO parameters remained stable and there was also improvement of the blood gas parameters (Table 1 ).
Table 1

Hemodynamic and arterial blood gas parameters before, during, and after prone positioning (PP): H = hours.

VariablesPRE-PP (H-1)DURING PPLATERAL - RIGHT (H + 2)LATERAL – LEFT (H + 4)POST-PP (H + 7)
Heart rate (beats per minute)114136105121123
Respiratory rate (breaths per minute)3029212823
Systolic arterial pressure (mmHg)1561299313988
Diastolic arterial pressure (mmHg)5952405542
Body Temperature (°C)38.839.738.538.537.3
SpO2 (%)8996959798
pH7.487.487.41
PaCO2 (mmHg)32.136.238.5
PaO2 (mmHg)85112146
Base excess (mmol/L)1.10.30.1
Lactates (mmol/L)1.100.970.65
HNFO flow6060606060
HNFO FiO26060607070
Hemodynamic and arterial blood gas parameters before, during, and after prone positioning (PP): H = hours. During days 12–15 after the onset of first symptoms, the patient's hemodynamic situation remained stable without catecholamine support. During fever peaks, her respiratory state deteriorated, but blood gas samples were normal with alternate administration of HFNO and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with a decreasing concentration of dioxygen. The patient was lateralized for 2 -h periods during the day and was weaned off NIV in the morning and HFNO in the evening of day 15. Fetal monitoring 3 times a day provided reassuring results. On day 16, the patient returned to the obstetrics department and the still-pregnant woman was discharged 8 days later. Severe COVID-19 can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and pregnant women are not spared [1]. This case shows that continuation of HFNO with alternating PP and lateralization can improve respiratory function and, just as importantly, prolong pregnancy to avoid extreme prematurity. The PP is known to improve blood oxygenation and mortality in severe acute respiratory failure [2], and it is being used in the management of COVID-19 [3]. However, little is known about PP in pregnant women. In 2014, Samanta et al. [4] described a case of severe H1N1-related ARDS at 33 weeks of pregnancy. Despite orotracheal intubation, the respiratory state of the patient worsened, and ventilation in PP enabled satisfactory oxygenation to save the patient and continue the pregnancy. Claudia Oliveira et al. [5] outline the patient comfort advantages of PP in the respiratory function of pregnant women compared to supine and Fowler’s positions using special stretchers. The World Health Organization [3] have concluded that there is little evidence regarding PP in pregnant women. They may benefit from being placed in lateral positions to manage COVID-19 respiratory infection. Due to a lack of comfort, we experienced problems in maintaining our patient in PP for more than 2 h, and lateralization or adapted stretchers could be an interesting compromise. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a pregnant woman with COVID-19 whose condition and pregnancy were managed effectively by PP without sedation or invasive ventilation. The patient was able to return home still pregnant 24 days after the onset of the disease. Combining PP with HFNO could be a useful treatment strategy for avoiding intubation in pregnant women, but further studies are needed to validate our approach, particularly for treating acute respiratory failure in this specific population.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  3 in total

1.  Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Claude Guérin; Jean Reignier; Jean-Christophe Richard; Pascal Beuret; Arnaud Gacouin; Thierry Boulain; Emmanuelle Mercier; Michel Badet; Alain Mercat; Olivier Baudin; Marc Clavel; Delphine Chatellier; Samir Jaber; Sylvène Rosselli; Jordi Mancebo; Michel Sirodot; Gilles Hilbert; Christian Bengler; Jack Richecoeur; Marc Gainnier; Frédérique Bayle; Gael Bourdin; Véronique Leray; Raphaele Girard; Loredana Baboi; Louis Ayzac
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  How safe is the prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome at late pregnancy?

Authors:  Sukhen Samanta; Sujay Samanta; Jyotsna Wig; A K Baronia
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Influence of the prone position on a stretcher for pregnant women on maternal and fetal hemodynamic parameters and comfort in pregnancy.

Authors:  Claudia Oliveira; Marco Antonio Borges Lopes; Agatha Sacramento Rodrigues; Marcelo Zugaib; Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.365

  3 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  COVID-19 in the Critically Ill Pregnant Patient.

Authors:  Matthew Levitus; Scott A Shainker; Mai Colvin
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.879

2.  Ventilatory Support in Patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Paolo Maria Leone; Matteo Siciliano; Jacopo Simonetti; Angelena Lopez; Tanzira Zaman; Francesco Varone; Luca Richeldi
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 3.  Maternal clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes among pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019. A systematic review.

Authors:  Rommy H Novoa; Willy Quintana; Pedro Llancarí; Katherine Urbina-Quispe; Enrique Guevara-Ríos; Walter Ventura
Journal:  Travel Med Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 6.211

4.  Effect of COVID-19 on Mortality of Pregnant and Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Leila Karimi; Somayeh Makvandi; Amir Vahedian-Azimi; Thozhukat Sathyapalan; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2021-03-05

5.  SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical features and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Asma Khalil; Erkan Kalafat; Can Benlioglu; Pat O'Brien; Edward Morris; Tim Draycott; Shakila Thangaratinam; Kirsty Le Doare; Paul Heath; Shamez Ladhani; Peter von Dadelszen; Laura A Magee
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-07-03

6.  Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure: A rapid review.

Authors:  Jason Weatherald; Kevin Solverson; Danny J Zuege; Nicole Loroff; Kirsten M Fiest; Ken Kuljit S Parhar
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.425

7.  Pregnancy and Breastfeeding During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Published Pregnancy Cases.

Authors:  Carina Rodrigues; Inês Baía; Rosa Domingues; Henrique Barros
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-11-23

8.  Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through breast milk and breastfeeding: a living systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Centeno-Tablante; Melisa Medina-Rivera; Julia L Finkelstein; Pura Rayco-Solon; Maria Nieves Garcia-Casal; Lisa Rogers; Kate Ghezzi-Kopel; Pratiwi Ridwan; Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas; Saurabh Mehta
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 9.  Anesthesia Considerations for Pregnant People With COVID-19 Infection.

Authors:  Ruth Landau; Kyra Bernstein; Laurence E Ring
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.190

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.