Literature DB >> 32405080

Decreased T cell populations contribute to the increased severity of COVID-19.

Rui Liu1, Ying Wang2, Jie Li3, Huan Han1, Zunen Xia1, Fang Liu4, Kailang Wu5, Lan Yang6, Xinghui Liu6, Chengliang Zhu7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We observe changes of the main lymphocyte subsets (CD16+CD56CD19、CD3、CD4、and CD8) in COVID-19-infected patients and explore whether the changes are associated with disease severity.
METHODS: One-hundred and fifty-four cases of COVID-19-infected patients were selected and divided into 3 groups (moderate group, severe group and critical group). The flow cytometry assay was performed to examine the numbers of lymphocyte subsets.
RESULTS: CD3+, CD4+ and CD8 + T lymphocyte subsets were decreased in COVID-19-infected patients. Compared with the moderate group and the sever group, CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the critical group decreased greatly (P < 0.001, P = 0.005 or P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Reduced CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T lymphocyte counts may reflect the severity of the COVID-19. Monitoring T cell changes has important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of severe patients who may become critically ill.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD3(+) T cells; CD4(+) T cells; CD8(+) T cells; COVID-19; Lymphocyte subsets

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32405080      PMCID: PMC7219428          DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


Introduction

The COVID-19 is highly contagious and its pathologic mechanism has attracted a lot of attention [1], [2], [3]. Most patients eventually made a recovery after careful treatment, but, some had developed into severe and even critical illness [4]. To date, the detailed mechanisms underlying severe respiratory syndrome caused by COVID-19 coronavirus remain unclear [5]. What’s worse, there is no vaccine or effective treatment to rescue severe patients who might be turned into patients with critical illness [3]. Therefore, to clarify the pathological differences between moderate, severe, and critical patients is urgent. Cytokine storm, which is caused by excessive proinflammatory cytokine responses, is associated with a wide variety of infectious and noninfectious diseases [6], [7]. It is suggested that a cytokine storm plays an important role in the aggravation of the COVID-19 [8]. One important immune cell type that can be activated by virus and initiate a cytokine storm is T cells. After activation by antigen-presenting cells, T cells undergo proliferation and differentiation into specific effector T cells to clear pathogens through producing a series of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IFN-γ, TNF-a, IL-6 [6], [7]. However, whether T cells are involved in the progression of the COVID-19 is unknown.

Subjects & methods

Study population

The study covered 154 cases of novel coronavirus patients from the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University between 22 January 2020 to 25 February 2020. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Patients (the Fifth Pilot Ed.), moderate group (total 49, male 26 and female 23), sever group (total 61, male 34 and female 27), critical group (total 44, male 24 and female 20). The average age of the moderate group, the sever group, and the critical group is 63 ± 13, 63 ± 14, and 65 ± 15 y, respectively. There is no statistical significance between gender and age among these 3 groups (P > 0.05). All the experiments were performed at the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University and the research was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. All data were collected anonymously and recorded following the international standards for the protection of privacy and personal information.

Equipment and reagents

Flow cytometric analysis in our study was performed using a Flow Cytometer BNII (Becton Dickinson). Multitest™ 6-colour TBNK reagents were obtained from BD Biosciences.

Methods

Fasting blood were collected in heparin on all the patients involved was collected in early morning, all the tests were performed within 2 h. The expression of CD16+CD56CD19、CD3、CD4CD8 were analyzed by a Flow Cytometer BNII and the data were analyzed using FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS25.0, the non-normal distribution data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, medium values (P25-P75) were used to present the analysis data. The enumeration data were analyzed using χ2 test or Fisher’s test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

We collected data on demographic characteristics, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular diseases, chronic liver disease, respiratory system disease and malignant tumor), and the outcome observed. A total of 154 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were randomly selected, of whom 91 (59.09%) had at least one comorbidity (Table 1 ). It seems that patients with diabetes or cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases were more likely to develop into critically ill patients. While in patients with hypertension, chronic liver disease, and malignant tumor, there was no statistical difference among the moderate group, severe group and critical group. Surprisingly, patients with respiratory system disease also showed no effect on the severity of COVID-19. We also found that the patients in critical groups showed definite higher mortality than that in the other 2 groups. And there were no differences in the outcomes between the moderate group and the severe group. Differences in peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets among three groups of patients with COVID-19.
Table 1

Demographics and baseline characteristics of patients infected with COVID-19.

All patient (n = 154)moderate group (n = 49)severe group (n = 61)critical group (n = 44)p value
Age (y)64 ± 1463 ± 1363 ± 1465 ± 15NS
Gender (male/Female)84/7026/2334/2724/20NS
Chronic medical illness
Any comorbidity91 (59.09%)28 (57.14%)31 (50.82%)32 (72.73%)NS
Diabetes19 (12.34%)5 (10.20%)4 (6.56%)10 (22.73%)0.039
Hypertension48 (31.17%)13 (26.53%)16 (26.23%)19 (43.18%)NS
Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases30 (19.48%)13 (26.53%)2 (3.28%)15 (34.09%)<0.001
Chronic liver disease5 (3.25%)2 (4.08%)2 (3.28%)1 (2.27%)NS
Respiratory systemdisease15 (9.74%)2 (4.08%)6 (9.84%)7 (15.91%)NS
Malignant tumor3 (1.95%)0 (0.00%)2 (3.28%)1 (2.27%)NS
Clinical outcome
Remained in hospital41 (26.62%)16 (32.65%)13 (21.31%)12 (27.27%)NS
Transferred10 (6.49%)6 (12.24%)4 (6.56%)0 (0.00%)NS
Discharged76 (49.35%)24 (48.98%)42 (68.85%)10 (22.73%)<0.001
Died24 (15.58%)2 (4.08%)2 (3.28%)20 (45.45%)<0.001

Note: Three patients lost case information and data are mean ± SD, n/n, or n (%). p values comparing moderate group, severe group and critical group are from χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, or Variance analysis, P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Demographics and baseline characteristics of patients infected with COVID-19. Note: Three patients lost case information and data are mean ± SD, n/n, or n (%). p values comparing moderate group, severe group and critical group are from χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, or Variance analysis, P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. We examined the distribution of peripheral blood lymphocytes in patients infected with COVID-19 and correlations between the COVID-19 and the lymphocyte subsets. As shown in the following Table 2 , the lymphocytes were decreased in most patients (72.73%). Compared to the moderate group (63.27%) and the severe group (73.77%), the lymphocytes numbers decreased significantly in the critical group (81.82%).
Table 2

The comparison of lymphocyte subsets of patients infected with COVID-19 between different groups.

All patient(n=154)moderate group(n=49)severe group(n=61)critical group(n=44)p value
CD16+56 count, per ul109(64.75~170)118(76.5~184)99(54.5~160)95(61.25~181.75)NS
<8462/154(40.26%)14/49(28.57%)27/61(44.26%)21/44(47.73%)NS
≥8492/154(59.74%)35/49(71.43%)34/61(55.74%)23/44(52.27%)-
CD19 count, per ul119.5(77.75~178.75)114(62.5~197)131(95.5~194.5)106.5(70~165)NS
<8039/154(25.32%)14/49(28.57%)10/61(16.39%)15/44(34.09%)NS
≥80115/154(74.68%)35/49(71.43%)51/61(83.61%)29/44(65.91)-
CD3 count, per ul437.5(308.75~648.25)509(336.5~873.5)517(376~651.5)341.5(226.75~440.5)<0.001
<723120/154(77.92%)32/49(65.31%)50/61(81.97%)38/44(86.36%)0.031
≥72334/154(22.08%)17/49(34.69%)11/61(18.03%)6/44(13.64%)-
CD4 count, per ul276(178~402.25)290(172.5~506)292(237.5~399.5)192.5(125.25~335.5)0.005
<404117/154(75.97%)30/49(61.22%)47/61(77.05%)40/44(90.91%)0.004
≥40437/154(24.03%)19/49(38.78%)14/61(22.95%)4/44(9.09%)-
CD8 count, per ul146.5(89.75~257.25)161(101~302.5)200(93~261)98.5(54.5~158.75)0.001
<220105/154(68.18%)31/49(63.27%)37/61(60.66%)37/44(84.09%)0.026
≥22049/154(31.82%)18/49(36.73%)24/61(39.34%)7/44(15.91%)-
CD4 count/CD8 count1.76(1.18~2.77)1.89(1.25~2.64)1.75(1.09~2.75)1.74(1.19~3.33)NS
<0.924/154(15.58%)9/49(18.37%)10/61(16.39%)5/44(11.36%)NS
0.9-2.063/154(40.91%)18/49(36.73%)24/61(39.34%)21/44(47.73%)-
≥2.067/154(43.51%)22/49(44.90%)27/61(44.26%)18/44(40.91%)-
Lymphocyte count, ×109 per L0.835(0.608~1.13)0.96(0.635~1.35)0.91(0.67~1.12)0.75(0.533~0.888)0.012
<1.1112/154(72.73%)31(63.27%)45(73.77%)36(81.82%)0.13
1.1-3.242/154(27.27%)18(36.73%)16(26.23%)8(18.18%)-

Note: Data are median (IQR) or n/N (%), where N is the total number of patients with available data. p values comparing moderate group, severe group and critical group are from χ2, Fisher’s exact test, or Kruskal-Wallis test, P<0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

The comparison of lymphocyte subsets of patients infected with COVID-19 between different groups. Note: Data are median (IQR) or n/N (%), where N is the total number of patients with available data. p values comparing moderate group, severe group and critical group are from χ2, Fisher’s exact test, or Kruskal-Wallis test, P<0.05 was defined as statistically significant. In our study (Fig. 1 ), the absolute value of CD3+ T cells was below the normal range in 120 (77.92%) patients. Compared to the severe group, the median absolute value of CD3+ T cells was significantly lowered (P < 0.001) in the critical group, whereas no significant difference was found between the moderate group and the severe group. The absolute value of CD4+ T cells was below the normal range in 117 (75.97%) patients. Almost all the patients in the critical group showed low CD4+ T cell counts (40/total 44, 90.91%). Moreover, a significantly lower median absolute value of CD4+ T cells was observed in the critical group compared to the severe group (P = 0.005), but not in the moderate group versus the severe group. The absolute value of CD8+ T cells was below the normal rage in 2/3 patients (105/total 154). Similar to CD4+ T cells, compared to the severe group, the median absolute value of CD8+ T cells was significantly lower in the critical group (P = 0.005), while no significant differences were found between the moderate group and the severe group. Meanwhile, the CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio was below the normal range in 24 patients (15.58%) and above the normal range in 67 patients (43.51%). No statistical significant difference was observed among the three study groups in the two different disorders.
Fig. 1

Absolute values of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ lymphocytes, in patients with moderate, severe or critical COVID-19 infection. The longer horizontal line indicates the median value for each group. *** indicates P < 0.01, ** indicates P < 0.05.

Absolute values of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ lymphocytes, in patients with moderate, severe or critical COVID-19 infection. The longer horizontal line indicates the median value for each group. *** indicates P < 0.01, ** indicates P < 0.05. We also observed a reduction concerning the normal range of NK cells (CD16+CD56) in 62 patients (40.26%) and B cells (CD19+) in 39 patients (25.32%), but no statistical differences were found in absolute values of NK cells or B cells among the 3 groups.

Discussion

Whether T cells are involved in the progression of the COVID-19 is not clear. In this study, we found there was a strong correlation between the severity of COVID-19 and the CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. we have shown that the population of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ Lymphocyte subsets is decreased when patients went from severe to critical whereas the populations of T cells are comparable between moderate and severe patients. However, there was no significant changes in the number of NK cells and B cells between these groups. Based on the data, our study has strengthened the significance of T cells in the clearance of the COVID-19 coronavirus. Of the 154 patients with COVID-19 recruited, the median age was 63.90 y and 84 were male. In the cohort, we observed that 59% of patients had at least one underlying disorder including diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and chronic liver disease, respiratory system disease and malignant tumor. In accordance with previous reports, we observed that patients with diabetes or cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases were more likely to develop into critically ill patients [1], [11]. However, there was no statistical difference in disease severity in patients with hypertension, chronic liver disease, malignant tumor, or even respiratory system disease, suggesting that different underlying diseases contribute differently to disease progression of COVID-19. CD3+ T cells are mainly composed of CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells. CD4+ helper T cells have a crucial role in adaptive immune responses [9]. Upon antigen presentation, naïve CD4+ T cells can differentiate into distinct subsets [10]. Among them, Th1 cells, which are induced by IL-12 and produce large quantities of IFN-γ, are involved in enhancing the clearance of certain intracellular pathogens, including viruses [10], [11]. Besides, CD8+ T cells restricted by class I major histocompatibility complex molecules are important in establishing immunity to influenza virus because they recognize internal viral proteins that are conserved between multiple viral strains [12]. Both CD4+T cells and CD8+ T cells are critical in defending against influenza viruses [13], [14], [15]. Since the sequence of the new coronavirus is highly homologous to SARS and MERS virus [16], [17], both of which are severe respiration viruses, probably that CD4+T cells and CD8+ T cells are also responsible for controlling the new coronavirus. Here, we have shown that the reduction of those populations is associated with the enhancement of the severity of patients with the COVID-19. Although further studies are needed to examine the detailed mechanisms of how T cell controlling the COVID-19 coronavirus, our findings broaden our horizons in understanding the pathogenesis of the COVID-19. Complications or ultimately death caused by COVID-19 are often associated with cytokine storms [18]. It was reported that people with weakened immune systems due to pre-existing diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, liver or kidney disease, are more likely to get infected by the new coronavirus or even more easily turned into severe or critical illness [4], [19]. Since depressed immunity is manifested by decreased immune cell populations including T cells, patients can easily cause the onset of cytokine storm when encountering massive virus invasion. Nowadays, it is common to use glucocorticoid [20] or specific neutralization antibodies to fight against cytokine storms [21]. The former causes a lot of complications while the latter is costly [22]. It has been proposed that immuno-modulatory therapy may prevent cytokine storms [14]. Here, we proposed that enhancing T cell populations or improving their functions through medical features or diet may deter the disease from getting worse. Our results further support the concept that boosting your immunity is effective in dealing with viruses [23], [24].

Conclusion

Taken together, we suggested that T cells may play an important role in regulating the development of COVID-19. Enhancing T cell populations may be effective in preventing severe patients from getting worse.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Rui Liu: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft. Ying Wang: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft. Jie Li: Data curation. Huan Han: Data curation. Zunen Xia: Data curation. Fang Liu: Investigation. Kailang Wu: Investigation. Lan Yang: Investigation. Xinghui Liu: Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Chengliang Zhu: Supervision, Writing - review & editing.
  23 in total

Review 1.  CD4 T cells: fates, functions, and faults.

Authors:  Jinfang Zhu; William E Paul
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Routine use of corticosteroids to prevent inflammation response in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Tim Nebelsiek; Andres Beiras-Fernandez; Erich Kilger; Patrick Möhnle; Florian Weis
Journal:  Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov       Date:  2012-12

Review 3.  Cytokine storm and sepsis disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  Benjamin G Chousterman; Filip K Swirski; Georg F Weber
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 4.  Influenza virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity induced by infection and vaccination.

Authors:  Janina M Jansen; Thomas Gerlach; Husni Elbahesh; Guus F Rimmelzwaan; Giulietta Saletti
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 5.  Regulation, Communication, and Functional Roles of Adipose Tissue-Resident CD4+ T Cells in the Control of Metabolic Homeostasis.

Authors:  Haiyan Zhou; Feng Liu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding.

Authors:  Roujian Lu; Xiang Zhao; Juan Li; Peihua Niu; Bo Yang; Honglong Wu; Wenling Wang; Hao Song; Baoying Huang; Na Zhu; Yuhai Bi; Xuejun Ma; Faxian Zhan; Liang Wang; Tao Hu; Hong Zhou; Zhenhong Hu; Weimin Zhou; Li Zhao; Jing Chen; Yao Meng; Ji Wang; Yang Lin; Jianying Yuan; Zhihao Xie; Jinmin Ma; William J Liu; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Edward C Holmes; George F Gao; Guizhen Wu; Weijun Chen; Weifeng Shi; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The COVID-19 epidemic.

Authors:  Thirumalaisamy P Velavan; Christian G Meyer
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 8.  Understanding influenza transmission, immunity and pandemic threats.

Authors:  John D Mathews; Joanne M Chesson; James M McCaw; Jodie McVernon
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 9.  Can Complementary Prime-Boost Immunization Strategies Be an Alternative and Promising Vaccine Approach Against Dengue Virus?

Authors:  Iris Valdés; Laura Lazo; Lisset Hermida; Gerardo Guillén; Lázaro Gil
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  COVID-19 Presents High Risk to Older Persons.

Authors:  William B Applegate; Joseph G Ouslander
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  39 in total

1.  [Guideline S1: Long COVID: Diagnostics and treatment strategies].

Authors:  Susanne Rabady; Johann Altenberger; Markus Brose; Doris-Maria Denk-Linnert; Elisabeth Fertl; Florian Götzinger; Maria de la Cruz Gomez Pellin; Benedikt Hofbaur; Kathryn Hoffmann; Renate Hoffmann-Dorninger; Rembert Koczulla; Oliver Lammel; Bernd Lamprecht; Judith Löffler-Ragg; Christian A Müller; Stefanie Poggenburg; Hans Rittmannsberger; Paul Sator; Volker Strenger; Karin Vonbank; Johannes Wancata; Thomas Weber; Jörg Weber; Günter Weiss; Maria Wendler; Ralf-Harun Zwick
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Monocytic-Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells Suppress T-Cell Responses in Recovered SARS CoV2-Infected Individuals.

Authors:  Nadejda Beliakova-Bethell; Kathirvel Maruthai; Ruijie Xu; Liliana C M Salvador; Ankita Garg
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  Evaluation of lymphocyte count, T-cell subsets and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as early predictors for severity and outcome of COVID-19 disease-a report from a highly complex hospital in Brazil.

Authors:  Douglas Câmara de Oliveira; Beatriz Sanada Spiri; Yara Carolina Schluga; Julie Lilian Pimentel Justus; Francisco Diego Negrão Lopes Neto; Ana Paula de Azambuja
Journal:  Hematol Transfus Cell Ther       Date:  2022-06-29

4.  Programmed Cell Death-1/Programmed Cell Death-1 Ligand as Prognostic Markers of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Severity.

Authors:  Paulina Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej; Adam Majchrzak; Bogusz Aksak-Wąs; Karol Serwin; Zenon Czajkowski; Ewelina Grywalska; Izabela Korona-Głowniak; Jacek Roliński; Miłosz Parczewski
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 7.666

5.  A comprehensive evaluation of the immune system response and type-I Interferon signaling pathway in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Sadegh Soltani-Zangbar; Forough Parhizkar; Elham Ghaedi; Ali Tarbiat; Roza Motavalli; Amin Alizadegan; Leili Aghebati-Maleki; Davoud Rostamzadeh; Yousef Yousefzadeh; Golamreza Jadideslam; Sima Shahmohammadi Farid; Leila Roshangar; Ata Mahmoodpoor; Javad Ahmadian Heris; Abolfazl Miahipour; Mehdi Yousefi
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 7.525

Review 6.  The mechanism underlying extrapulmonary complications of the coronavirus disease 2019 and its therapeutic implication.

Authors:  Qin Ning; Di Wu; Xiaojing Wang; Dong Xi; Tao Chen; Guang Chen; Hongwu Wang; Huiling Lu; Ming Wang; Lin Zhu; Junjian Hu; Tingting Liu; Ke Ma; Meifang Han; Xiaoping Luo
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-02-23

7.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme-1 gene insertion/deletion polymorphism may be associated with COVID-19 clinical severity: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ozgur Gunal; Ozlem Sezer; Goksenin Unluguzel Ustun; Cagatay Erman Ozturk; Ahmet Sen; Serbulent Yigit; Mehmet Derya Demirag
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.526

8.  Iron metabolism and lymphocyte characterisation during Covid-19 infection in ICU patients: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Giuliano Bolondi; Emanuele Russo; Emiliano Gamberini; Alessandro Circelli; Manlio Cosimo Claudio Meca; Etrusca Brogi; Lorenzo Viola; Luca Bissoni; Venerino Poletti; Vanni Agnoletti
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Immuno-inflammatory predictors of disease severity in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suchismita Panda; Rachita Nanda; Prasanta Kumar Tripathy; Manaswini Mangaraj
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-04-08

10.  Immunosuppression as a Hallmark of Critical COVID-19: Prospective Study.

Authors:  Elżbieta Kalicińska; Donata Szymczak; Aleksander Zińczuk; Barbara Adamik; Jakub Smiechowicz; Tomasz Skalec; Danuta Nowicka-Suszko; Monika Biernat; Aleksandra Bogucka-Fedorczuk; Justyna Rybka; Adrian Martuszewski; Waldemar Gozdzik; Krzysztof Simon; Tomasz Wróbel
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.