Literature DB >> 32404958

Heterozygous/dispermic complete mole confers a significantly higher risk for post-molar gestational trophoblastic disease.

Xing-Zheng Zheng1, Xu-Ying Qin2, Su-Wen Chen3, Peng Wang2, Yang Zhan1, Ping-Ping Zhong1, Natalia Buza4, Yu-Lan Jin1, Bing-Quan Wu5, Pei Hui6.   

Abstract

Hydatidiform moles are classified at the genetic level as androgenetic complete mole and diandric-monogynic partial mole. Conflicting data exist whether heterozygous complete moles are more aggressive clinically than homozygous complete moles. We investigated clinical outcome in a large cohort of hydatidiform moles in Chinese patients with an emphasis on genotypical correlation with post-molar gestational trophoblastic disease. Consecutive products of conceptions undergoing DNA genotyping and p57 immunohistochemistry to rule out molar gestations were included from a 5-year period at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital. Patient demographics and clinical follow-up information were obtained. Post-molar gestational trophoblastic disease or gestational trophoblastic neoplasia was determined by the 2002 WHO/FIGO criteria. A total of 1245 products of conceptions were classified based on genotyping results into 219 complete moles, 250 partial moles, and 776 non-molar gestations. Among 219 complete moles, 186 were homozygous/monospermic and 33 were heterozygous/dispermic. Among 250 partial moles, 246 were triploid dispermic, 2 were triploid monospermic, and 2 were tetraploid heterozygous partial moles. Among 776 non-molar gestations, 644 were diploid without chromosomal aneuploidies detectable by STR genotyping and 132 had various genetic abnormalities including 122 cases of various trisomies, 2 triploid digynic-monoandric non-molar gestations, 7 cases of possible chromosomal monosomy or uniparental disomy. Successful follow-up was achieved in 165 complete moles: post-molar gestational trophoblastic disease developed in 11.6% (16/138 cases) of homozygous complete moles and 37.0% (10/27 cases) of heterozygous complete moles. The difference between the two groups was highly significant (p = 0.0009, chi-square). None of the 218 partial moles and 367 non-molar gestations developed post-molar gestational trophoblastic disease. In conclusion, heterozygous/dispermic complete moles are clinically more aggressive with a significantly higher risk for development of post-molar gestational trophoblastic disease compared with homozygous/monospermic complete moles. Therefore, precise genotyping classification of complete moles is important for clinical prognosis and patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32404958     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0566-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  46 in total

1.  Application of gene amplification by polymerase chain reaction to genetic analysis of molar mitochondrial DNA: the detection of anuclear empty ovum as the cause of complete mole.

Authors:  C Azuma; F Saji; Y Tokugawa; T Kimura; T Nobunaga; M Takemura; T Kameda; O Tanizawa
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Genotypic analysis of hydatidiform mole: an accurate and practical method of diagnosis.

Authors:  Carlo Bifulco; Chaline Johnson; Liming Hao; Husnain Kermalli; Susan Bell; Pei Hui
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  Clinical practice. Molar pregnancy.

Authors:  Ross S Berkowitz; Donald P Goldstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Clinicopathologic study of tetraploid hydropic villous tissues.

Authors:  M Fukunaga; Y Endo; S Ushigome
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 5.  Hydatidiform Moles: Genetic Basis and Precision Diagnosis.

Authors:  Pei Hui; Natalia Buza; Kathleen M Murphy; Brigitte M Ronnett
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 23.472

6.  The biology of tetraploid hydatidiform moles: histopathology, cytogenetics, and flow cytometry.

Authors:  J M Lage; D S Weinberg; D L Yavner; F R Bieber
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Tetraploid Partial Hydatidiform Moles: Molecular Genotyping and Determination of Parental Contributions.

Authors:  Jennifer Bynum; Denise Batista; Rena Xian; Deyin Xing; James R Eshleman; Brigitte M Ronnett; Gang Zheng
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Complete hydatidiform moles combine maternal mitochondria with a paternal nuclear genome.

Authors:  Y H Edwards; S J Jeremiah; S L McMillan; S Povey; R A Fisher; S D Lawler
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  Complete moles have paternal chromosomes but maternal mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  D C Wallace; U Surti; C W Adams; A E Szulman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  A clinical, histopathological and flow cytometric study of 149 complete moles, 146 partial moles and 107 non-molar hydropic abortions.

Authors:  F J Paradinas; P Browne; R A Fisher; M Foskett; K D Bagshawe; E Newlands
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.087

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genotyping diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease: frontiers in precision medicine.

Authors:  Natalia Buza; Pei Hui
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Refined diagnosis of hydatidiform moles with p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping: updated analysis of a prospective series of 2217 cases.

Authors:  Deyin Xing; Emily Adams; Jialing Huang; Brigitte M Ronnett
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Loss of Selenoprotein Iodothyronine Deiodinase 3 Expression Correlates with Progression of Complete Hydatidiform Mole to Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia.

Authors:  Jessica D St Laurent; Lawrence H Lin; David M Owen; Izildinha Maestá; Arnold Castaneda; Kathleen T Hasselblatt; Donald P Goldstein; Neil S Horowitz; Ross S Berkowitz; Kevin M Elias
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Parental contribution to trisomy in heterozygous androgenetic complete moles.

Authors:  Hirokazu Usui; Asuka Sato; Makio Shozu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.