Literature DB >> 32404951

The effect of an e-learning module on grading variation of (pre)malignant breast lesions.

Carmen van Dooijeweert1, Ivette A G Deckers2, Emma J de Ruiter1, Natalie D Ter Hoeve1, Celien P H Vreuls1, Elsken van der Wall3, Paul J van Diest4.   

Abstract

Histologic grade is a biomarker that is widely used to guide treatment of invasive breast cancer (IBC) and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS). Yet, currently, substantial grading variation between laboratories and pathologists exists in daily pathology practice. This study was conducted to evaluate whether an e-learning may be a feasible tool to decrease grading variation of (pre)malignant breast lesions. An e-learning module, representing the key-concepts of grading (pre)malignant breast lesions through gold standard digital images, was designed. Pathologists and residents could take part in either or both the separate modules on DCIS and IBC. Variation in grading of a digital set of lesions before and after the e-learning was compared in a fully-crossed study-design. Multiple outcome measures were assessed: inter-rater reliability (IRR) by Light's kappa, the number of images graded unanimously, the number of images with both extreme scores (i.e., grade I and grade III), and the average number of discrepancies from expert-consensus. Participants were included as they completed both the pre- and post-e-learning set (DCIS-module: n = 36, IBC-module: n = 21). For DCIS, all outcome measures improved after e-learning, with the IRR improving from fair (kappa: 0.532) to good (kappa: 0.657). For IBC, all outcome measures for the subcategories tubular differentiation and mitosis improved, with >90% of participants agreeing on almost 90% of the images after the e-learning. In contrast, the IRR for the subcategory of nuclear pleomorphism remained fair (kappa: 0.523 vs. kappa: 0.571). This study shows that an e-learning module, in which pathologists and residents are trained in histologic grading of DCIS and IBC, is a feasible and promising tool to decrease grading variation of (pre)malignant breast lesions. This is highly relevant given the important role of histologic grading in clinical decision making of (pre)malignant breast lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32404951     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0556-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  2 in total

1.  Surgery versus monitoring and endocrine therapy for low-risk DCIS: The COMET Trial.

Authors:  Linda M Youngwirth; Judy C Boughey; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01

Review 2.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification.

Authors:  R Holland; J L Peterse; R R Millis; V Eusebi; D Faverly; M J van de Vijver; B Zafrani
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.464

  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  The increasing importance of histologic grading in tailoring adjuvant systemic therapy in 30,843 breast cancer patients.

Authors:  C van Dooijeweert; I O Baas; I A G Deckers; S Siesling; P J van Diest; E van der Wall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Variability in grading of ductal carcinoma in situ among an international group of pathologists.

Authors:  Esther H Lips; Jelle Wesseling; Maartje van Seijen; Katarzyna Jóźwiak; Sarah E Pinder; Allison Hall; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Jeremy Sj Thomas; Laura C Collins; Jonathan Bijron; Joost Bart; Danielle Cohen; Wen Ng; Ihssane Bouybayoune; Hilary Stobart; Jan Hudecek; Michael Schaapveld; Alastair Thompson
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2021-02-23

Review 3.  Grading of invasive breast carcinoma: the way forward.

Authors:  C van Dooijeweert; P J van Diest; I O Ellis
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.535

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.