Gaoli Liu1, Shaowen Zhang1, Zhangfan Mao1, Weixing Wang2, Haifeng Hu1. 1. Department of Thoracic surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Jiefang Road 238, Hubei province, Wuhan, 430060, PR China. 2. Department of General surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Jiefang Road 238, Hubei province, Wuhan, 430060, PR China. 13392186@qq.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the nutritional risks among older patients with COVID-19 and their associated clinical outcomes using four nutritional risk screening (NRS) tools: Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Mini Nutrition Assessment Shortcut (MNA-sf), and Nutrition Risk Index (NRI). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with COVID-19 older than 65 years who were treated in our hospital from January 28, 2020 to March 5, 2020, and explored the relationship between nutritional risk and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients with COVID-19 (46 common COVID-19, 73 severe COVID-19, and 22 extremely severe COVID-19) were enrolled in the study. NRS 2002 identified 85.8% of patients as having risk, with being identified 41.1% by MUST, 77.3% by MNA-sf, and 71.6% by NRI. The agreement strength was moderate between NRS 2002 and MNA-sf, NRI, fair between MUST and MNA-sf, NRI, fair between MNA-sf and NRI, poor between NRS 2002 and MUST (P < 0.01). After adjustment for confounding factors in multivariate regression analysis, patients in the risk group had significantly longer LOS, higher hospital expenses (except MNA-sf), poor appetite, heavier disease severity, and more weight change(kg) than normal patients by using NRS 2002, MNA-sf, and NRI(P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The NRS 2002, MNA-sf, and NRI are useful and practical tools with respect to screening for patients with COVID-19 who are at nutritional risk, as well as in need of additional nutritional intervention.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the nutritional risks among older patients with COVID-19 and their associated clinical outcomes using four nutritional risk screening (NRS) tools: Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Mini Nutrition Assessment Shortcut (MNA-sf), and Nutrition Risk Index (NRI). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with COVID-19 older than 65 years who were treated in our hospital from January 28, 2020 to March 5, 2020, and explored the relationship between nutritional risk and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients with COVID-19 (46 common COVID-19, 73 severe COVID-19, and 22 extremely severe COVID-19) were enrolled in the study. NRS 2002 identified 85.8% of patients as having risk, with being identified 41.1% by MUST, 77.3% by MNA-sf, and 71.6% by NRI. The agreement strength was moderate between NRS 2002 and MNA-sf, NRI, fair between MUST and MNA-sf, NRI, fair between MNA-sf and NRI, poor between NRS 2002 and MUST (P < 0.01). After adjustment for confounding factors in multivariate regression analysis, patients in the risk group had significantly longer LOS, higher hospital expenses (except MNA-sf), poor appetite, heavier disease severity, and more weight change(kg) than normal patients by using NRS 2002, MNA-sf, and NRI(P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The NRS 2002, MNA-sf, and NRI are useful and practical tools with respect to screening for patients with COVID-19 who are at nutritional risk, as well as in need of additional nutritional intervention.
Authors: Paul Obeng; Henneh Kwaku Kyereh; Jacob Owusu Sarfo; Edward Wilson Ansah; Priscilla Yeye Adumoah Attafuah Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 4.070
Authors: Philip T James; Zakari Ali; Andrew E Armitage; Ana Bonell; Carla Cerami; Hal Drakesmith; Modou Jobe; Kerry S Jones; Zara Liew; Sophie E Moore; Fernanda Morales-Berstein; Helen M Nabwera; Behzad Nadjm; Sant-Rayn Pasricha; Pauline Scheelbeek; Matt J Silver; Megan R Teh; Andrew M Prentice Journal: J Nutr Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: L Kananen; M Eriksdotter; A M Boström; M Kivipelto; M Annetorp; C Metzner; V Bäck Jerlardtz; M Engström; P Johnson; L G Lundberg; E Åkesson; C Sühl Öberg; S Hägg; D Religa; J Jylhävä; T Cederholm Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 7.324