Literature DB >> 32404661

Lasting Symptoms After Esophageal Resection (LASER): European Multicenter Cross-sectional Study.

Sheraz R Markar1,2, Giovanni Zaninotto1, Carlo Castoro3,4, Asif Johar2, Pernilla Lagergren1,2, Jessie A Elliott5, Suzanne S Gisbertz6, Christophe Mariette7, Rita Alfieri3, Jeremy Huddy1, Viknesh Sounderajah1, Eleonora Pinto3, Marco Scarpa3, Fredrik Klevebro2, Berit Sunde2, Conor F Murphy5, Christine Greene5, Narayanasamy Ravi5, Guillaume Piessen7, Hylke Brenkman8, Jelle P Ruurda8, Richard Van Hillegersberg8, Sjoerd Lagarde9, Bas Wijnhoven9, Manuel Pera10, José Roig10, Sandra Castro10, Robert Matthijsen11, John Findlay12, Stefan Antonowicz12, Nick Maynard12, Orla McCormack13, Arun Ariyarathenam14, Grant Sanders14, Edward Cheong15, Shameen Jaunoo16, William Allum13, Jan Van Lanschot9, Magnus Nilsson17, John V Reynolds5, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen6, George B Hanna1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the most prevalent symptoms and those with greatest impact upon health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among esophageal cancer survivors.
BACKGROUND: Long-term symptom burden after esophagectomy, and associations with HRQOL, are poorly understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2010 and 2016, patients from 20 European Centers who underwent esophageal cancer surgery, and were disease-free at least 1 year postoperatively were asked to complete LASER, EORTC-QLQ-C30, and QLQ-OG25 questionnaires. Specific symptom questionnaire items that were associated with poor HRQOL as identified by EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25 were identified by multivariable regression analysis and combined to form a tool.
RESULTS: A total of 876 of 1081 invited patients responded to the questionnaire, giving a response rate of 81%. Of these, 66.9% stated in the last 6 months they had symptoms associated with their esophagectomy. Ongoing weight loss was reported by 10.4% of patients, and only 13.8% returned to work with the same activities.Three LASER symptoms were correlated with poor HRQOL on multivariable analysis; pain on scars on chest (odds ratio (OR) 1.27; 95% CI 0.97-1.65), low mood (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.15-1.77) and reduced energy or activity tolerance (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.18-1.59). The areas under the curves for the development and validation datasets were 0.81 ± 0.02 and 0.82 ± 0.09 respectively.
CONCLUSION: Two-thirds of patients experience significant symptoms more than 1 year after surgery. The 3 key symptoms associated with poor HRQOL identified in this study should be further validated, and could be used in clinical practice to identify patients who require increased support.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 32404661     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  6 in total

1.  Critical Competences for the Management of Post-Operative Course in Patients with Digestive Tract Cancer: The Contribution of MADIT Methodology for a Nine-Month Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Eleonora Pinto; Alessandro Fabbian; Rita Alfieri; Anna Da Roit; Salvatore Marano; Genny Mattara; Pierluigi Pilati; Carlo Castoro; Marco Cavarzan; Marta Silvia Dalla Riva; Luisa Orrù; Gian Piero Turchi
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09

Review 2.  Physiotherapy Regimens in Esophagectomy and Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Karina H Tukanova; Swathikan Chidambaram; Nadia Guidozzi; George B Hanna; Alison H McGregor; Sheraz R Markar
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Functional Impairments and Quality of Life in Older Adults With Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Authors:  Elaine Buckley; Lennie Wong; Yanghee Woo; Laleh Melstrom; Susanne Warner; Mustafa Raoof; Yuman Fong; Virginia Sun
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Validation of data quality in a nationwide gastroenterological surgical database: The National Clinical Database site-visit and remote audits, 2016-2018.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hasegawa; Arata Takahashi; Shingo Kanaji; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Shigeru Marubashi; Hiroyuki Konno; Mitsukazu Gotoh; Hiroaki Miyata; Yuko Kitagawa; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-12-22

5.  Managing the Consequences of Oncological Major Surgery: A Short- and Medium-Term Skills Assessment Proposal for Patient and Caregiver through M.A.D.I.T. Methodology.

Authors:  Gian Piero Turchi; Alessandro Fabbian; Rita Alfieri; Anna Da Roit; Salvatore Marano; Genny Mattara; Pierluigi Pilati; Carlo Castoro; Davide Bassi; Marta Silvia Dalla Riva; Luisa Orrù; Eleonora Pinto
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-15

6.  Patient perspectives on key symptoms and preferences for follow-up after upper gastro-intestinal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Annie Coombes; Orla Evans; Joanna Taylor; Jonathan L Moore; Annabelle White; Jesper Lagergren; Cara Baker; Mark Kelly; James A Gossage; Jason Dunn; Sebastian Zeki; Ben E Byrne; Jervoise Andreyev; Andrew R Davies
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.