Literature DB >> 32404125

Cardiac operation under cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy.

Yanli Liu1, Fengzhen Han2, Jian Zhuang3, Xiaoqing Liu4, Jimei Chen5, Huanlei Huang5, Sheng Wang6, Chengbin Zhou5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Certain pregnant women suffer from cardiac pathology,and a few of them need cardiac operations under cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy. Feto-neonatal and maternal outcomes have not been sufficiently described.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 22 cases of women undergoing cardiac operations under cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy in our hospital from Jan.2014 to Mar.2019.
RESULTS: All 22 patients were alive after treatment. The types of cardiac disorders included congenital heart defects, rheumatic heart disease,infective endocarditis,aortic dissection, obstruction and/or thrombosis of a prosthetic valve. Only one case was a twin pregnancy,and the other 21 cases were singletons. Four fetuses died in the utero after surgery. Three patients chose termination of the pregnancy after the cardiac operations: one fetus was detected abnormity of the brain and the other two patients abandoned pregnancy. Fourteen fetuses were alive and born without any abnormity. Two fetuses suffered from neonatal intracranial hemorrhage and died after birth.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac operation under cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy is a challenge for physicians in multidisciplinary teams. Strictly evaluating the indication is vital. On the other hand, some patients can benefit from this management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac operation; Cardiopulmonary bypass; Outcome; Pregnancy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32404125      PMCID: PMC7218656          DOI: 10.1186/s13019-020-01136-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1749-8090            Impact factor:   1.637


Background

Heart disease complicates more than 1% of pregnancies and is now the leading cause of indirect maternal deaths [1]. Pregnancy creates a great burden on the cardiovascular system and can result in decompensation in women with underlying cardiac disease. To minimize the maternal and fetal risks, the first choice of treatment should be medical. In cases that are refractory to medical treatment, however, corrective cardiac operations should be undertaken [2]. As the Guangdong provincial obstetrical cardiology intensive care center in China, our hospital has accumulated a significant amount of clinical data of pregnant women with heart disease receiving cardiac operations under cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy. To investigate feto-neonatal and maternal outcomes, we conducted this study.

Materials and methods

Subject

We searched in our medical record database from Jan.2014 to Mar.2019. The search terms included “pregnancy”, “cardiopulmonary bypass” and “cardiac operation”. We obtained 22 copies of the patients’ medical materials containing the entire pregnancy course and fetal outcomes with their consent.

NYHA classes

The NYHA classification was developed in 1928 to describe an overall cardiac appraisal of the status of a patient with heart disease. It was divided into four classes [3]: Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in a slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV:Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure or anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

Cardioplegia technique

Adequate myocardial protection is essential for achieving successful outcomes of any surgical procedure necessitating cardiac arrest. The Del Nido solution (blood and crystalloid mixed formula) was used in all the cardiac operations of our study. The route of administration was antegrade or combined antegrade & retrograde.

Cardiac surgical procedures

Corrective cardiac operations consisted of mitral or/and tricuspid valve repair, aortic valve replacement (AVR),mitral valve replacement (MVR), ruptured sinus of Valsalva repair, atrial septal defect closure, ventricular septal defect closure, right ventricle outlet obstruction repair, prosthetic mitral/aortic valve thrombectomy and Betall procedure.

Maternal, fetal and neonatal complications after operation

The most common maternal complication was arrhythmia after operation. Fetal and neonatal complications included stillbirth, preterm delivery (< 37 weeks of gestation), neonatal intracranial hemorrhage and death.

Statistical analysis

A retrospective analysis was performed. Measurement data and enumeration data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or frequencies.

Results

Patient general information

The average age of the patients was 29.5 ± 5.4 years, with an age range of 21 to 42 years. Half the patients were nulliparous (n = 12, 54.5%). There was one twin pregnancy(n = 1, 4.5%)and the other patients were singletons(n = 21, 95.5%). The patient’s characteristics are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Patient’s characteristics

Patient No.Age (y)GravidityParitySingleton /twin (S/T)Weight during operation (kg)Type of heart diseaseNYHA functional classificationWeeks of gestation during operation (w)
13210S43ASD (PAH accompanied)II22+ 4
23641S60MR (PAH accompanied)II20+ 4
33330T63DCRVII26+ 5
43552S60MS (PAH accompanied)III18+ 6
52510S49Prosthetic AV stuckIII20+ 6
64231S72MS (PAH accompanied)IV27+ 3
73021S66MS + ASD (PAH accompanied)II23+ 4
82310S48ARII18+ 1
92942S49IE + MRIV25+ 5
102420S41ASD (PAH accompanied)II20+ 4
112610S49Prosthetic AV stuckIV19+ 5
122831S51VSD (PAH accompanied)II24+ 2
132541S55ASD (PAH accompanied)II22+ 3
142850S57Prosthetic ASII30+ 5
153721S74VSD + ARII20+ 3
162830S47ASD (PAH accompanied)II25+ 3
173631S50AD (Stanford type A)III23+ 6
182621S68IEIII26
193010S49MS (PAH accompanied)III28
202410S45ASD + VSD (PAH accompanied)III25+ 6
212110S48Ruptured sinus of Valsalva of the right coronary cusp+IEIV21
222510S48Prosthetic ASIII26+ 4

y Year, kg Kilogram, w Week, S Singleton, T Twin, ASD Atrial septal defect, VSD Ventricular septal defect, MR Mitral valve regurgitation, DCRV Double cavity of right ventricle, MS Mitral valve stenosis, AR Aortic valve regurgitation, IE Infective endocarditis, MR Mitral valve regurgitation, PAH Pulmonary artery hypertension, AD Aortic dissection, AS Aortic valve stenosis

Patient’s characteristics y Year, kg Kilogram, w Week, S Singleton, T Twin, ASD Atrial septal defect, VSD Ventricular septal defect, MR Mitral valve regurgitation, DCRV Double cavity of right ventricle, MS Mitral valve stenosis, AR Aortic valve regurgitation, IE Infective endocarditis, MR Mitral valve regurgitation, PAH Pulmonary artery hypertension, AD Aortic dissection, AS Aortic valve stenosis

Cardiac surgical procedure, intraoperatory parameters and fetal outcomes

There were 22 patients with different types of heart diseases who received cardiac operations under cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy. The composition and proportion distribution of these patients by the type of heart disease,weeks of gestation during operation, NYHA functional classification, cardiac surgical procedure, intraoperatory parameters and fetal outcomes are presented in Table 1,Table 2 and Table 3.
Table 2

Cardiac surgical procedure, intraoperatory parameters and fetal outcomes

Patient No.Cardiac surgical procedureSize of the cardiac valves/defects (mm)Aortic cross-clamp time (minutes)CPB time (minutes)CPB maximum flow (L)CPBminimum temperature (°C)Fetal outcomes
1atrial septal defect closure4510403.735.8term birth, alive
2mitral and tricuspid valve repair/60965.835.3term birth, alive
3right ventricle outlet obstructio-n repair/20474.735.4preterm birth, alive
4MVR2747754.536termination of pregnancy
5MVR25661025.535.5term birth, alive
6MVR253152536.5preterm birth, alive
7MVR+ atrial septal defect closure27/1335624.535.7preterm birth, alive
8AVR24751124.634.4term birth, alive
9prosthetic mitral valve thrombect-omy + mitr-al valve repair/1011334.934.8abnormity of the brain, termination of pregnancy
10atrial septal defect closure3518353.534.9term birth, alive
11MVR231201704.830term birth, alive
12ventricula-r septal defect closure13.830724.535.1term birth, alive
13atrial septal defect closure21.721404.235.8term birth, alive
14AVR1995122534.7preterm birth,death
15ventricula-r septal defect closure+ AVR16.3/2378975.236.6term birth, alive
16atrial septal defect closure3013254.536.2term birth, alive
17Betall procedure/1722414.530death in utero
18MVR2932574.436.3death in utero
19MVR2531524.9836preterm birth, death
20

atrial septal defect closure+

ventricula-r septal defect closure

12/2535744.334.1death in utero
21ruptured sinus of Valsalva repair+ valves thrombect-omy/1632114.133.1termination of pregnancy
22prosthetic aortic valve thrombect-omy/651744.017.7death in utero

mm Millimetre, L Litre, CPB Cardiopulmonary bypass, AVR Aortic valve replacement, MVR Mitral valve replacement

Table 3

Summary of indications for cardiac operation

Indicationn(%)
Congenital heart defect8(36.4%)
Rheumatic heart disease7 (31.8%)
Infective endocarditis2 (9.1%)
Aortic dissection1 (4.5%)
Obstruction and thrombosis of prosthetic valve4 (18.2%)
Cardiac surgical procedure, intraoperatory parameters and fetal outcomes atrial septal defect closure+ ventricula-r septal defect closure mm Millimetre, L Litre, CPB Cardiopulmonary bypass, AVR Aortic valve replacement, MVR Mitral valve replacement Summary of indications for cardiac operation

Feto-neonatal and maternal outcomes

All 22 patients were alive after treatment. Three cases were complicated by arrhythmia after operations, especially atrial fibrillation, which needed medications. Four fetuses died in the utero after operations. Three patients chose termination of the pregnancy: one fetus was detected a brain abnormity and the other two patients abandoned pregnancy. Fourteen fetuses were alive and born without any abnormity. Two fetuses had complicated neonatal intracranial hemorrhage and died after birth. Feto-neonatal outcomes and mode of delivery are presented in Table 4.
Table 4

Feto-neonatal outcomes and mode of delivery

Mode of deliveryn(%)Feto-neonatal outcome
Cesarean section14 (63.6%)

14 fetuses were alive without any abnormity(9 fetuses were term deliveries, and the other 5 were preterm deliveries).

One fetus manifested intracranial hemorrhage at 36 weeks of gestation and died after birth.

Induced labor (vaginal delivery)1 (4.5%)Neonatal intracranial hemorrhage and died after birth
Spontaneous abortion4 (18.2%)Intrauterine death after operation
Termination of pregnancy3 (13.6%)

1 fetus was detected abnormity of the brain.

2 patients abandoned pregnancy

Feto-neonatal outcomes and mode of delivery 14 fetuses were alive without any abnormity(9 fetuses were term deliveries, and the other 5 were preterm deliveries). One fetus manifested intracranial hemorrhage at 36 weeks of gestation and died after birth. 1 fetus was detected abnormity of the brain. 2 patients abandoned pregnancy

Discussion

Heart disease is the primary cause of maternal and fetal death in 1–4% of pregnancies. Pregnancy creates an increased burden on the maternal cardiovascular system and can result in decompensation in women with underlying cardiac disease. To minimize the maternal and fetal risks, the first choice of treatment should be medical. However, in some cases, medical therapy is not always sufficient,and open heart operation might be necessary [4]. In 1958, Leyse and colleagues [5] first used cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in a heart operation during pregnancy. After the initial trials, pregnant women have been recognized to tolerate CPB as well as non-pregnant women, but the effects of CPB on the fetus have varied [6]. Several review articles, reported the maternal mortality rate ranged from 1.5 to 5%, and the fetal mortality rate has ranged from 16 to 33% [4, 6]. Currently, reported maternal mortality for cardiac operations is similar to the mortality rate for non-pregnant female patients [7]. Therefore, CPB during pregnancy has a greater effect on the fetus than mother. In our report, the maternal mortality rate was 0%,and fetal mortality rate was 18.2%, as same as the above mentioned reviews. The present study demonstrated that mitral and/or aortic valve disorders were the most common surgical indications for CPB during pregnancy, although it has been recognized that coronary arterial disease is increasingly prevalent in gynecological patients [8]. The latter, however, could be managed interventionally in most patients, avoiding the risk associated with CPB for feto-neo-natal outcomes. In our report, the indications for surgical procedure under CPB during pregnancy consisted of congenital heart defect (ASD, DCRV, VSD), rheumatic heart disease (mitral or aortic valve disorders),infective endocarditis,aortic dissection, obstruction and thrombosis of the prosthetic valve. Seven patients (all with a congenital heart defect)accompanied moderate to severe PAH, which could result in sudden death and greatly increase the maternal and fetal risk. Consequently, we performed cardiac operations during pregnancy to maintain the pregnancy and to decrease the risk of adverse feto-neonatal outcomes. Other indications were life-threatening diseases, such as severe MS/AR, infective endocarditis,aortic dissection (Stanford type A), obstruction and thrombosis of the prosthetic valve. All patients were alive,and 3 cases had complicated arrhythmia after operations, especially atrial fibrillation. There were no other complications. The results indicate that cardiac operations can be performed during pregnancy with remarkable safety for mothers. Pregnant women who have cardiac operations requiring CPB must face a nonphysiologic hemodynamic status where the tolerance is not clearly known, which can adversely affect the fetus [4]. CPB can compromise utero-placental perfusion and fetal development by potential adverse effects such as coagulation and blood component alterations, the release of vasoactive substances from leukocytes, complement activation, particulate and air embolism, nonpulsatile flow, hypothermia and hypotension [2].Three main pathophysiological changes can occur in pregnant patients under CPB: uterine contraction, placental hypo-perfusion and fetal hypoxia. Utero-placental hypo-perfusion and fetal hypoxia subjected to sustained uterine contractions during CPB are considered risk factors for fetal death [9]. Despite the limited experimental data regarding the effect of CPB on uterine/placental blood flow and its effect on the fetus, it has been postulated that pulsatile, high-flow, high-pressure, normothermic bypass poses the least risk to the fetus [10, 11].According to the above theories we applied high-flow, high-pressure, normothermic bypass to the patients and shortened the operation time to greatly decrease the influence on the fetus. Finally,the fetuses gained good outcomes,and the mortality rate was 18.2%, lower than that reported in recent literature. Fourteen fetuses were alive and born without any abnormity. Unfortunately, two fetuses suffered neonatal intracranial hemorrhage and died after birth. However, we do not think it was associated with the operation or the CPB during pregnancy. The inappropriate use of Warfarin after operations was the main cause. The results indicate that cardiac operations can be performed during pregnancy with a degree of safety for fetus.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the decision to subject a pregnant woman to operation must be made by a team composed of an obstetrician, a cardiologist, an anesthesiologist and a neonatologist. Cardiac operation under CPB during pregnancy is a challenge for physicians in multidisciplinary teams. Strictly evaluating the indication is vital. On the other hand, some patients can benefit from this form of case management.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac operations during pregnancy: review of factors influencing fetal outcome.

Authors:  A Mahli; S Izdes; D Coskun
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Congenital aortic stenosis in pregnancy, corrected by extracorporeal circulation, offering a viable male infant at term but with anomalies eventuating in his death at four months of age--report of a case.

Authors:  R LEYSE; M OFSTUN; D H DILLARD; K A MERENDINO
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1961-06-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Maternal cardiac disease: update for the clinician.

Authors:  Lynn L Simpson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  The value of using the entire New York Heart Association's classification of heart and vascular disease.

Authors:  J Wills Hurst
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 5.  Reoperation for prosthetic valve endocarditis in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  S Westaby; A J Parry; J C Forfar
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  Cardiac surgery during pregnancy.

Authors:  C E Chambers; S L Clark
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.190

7.  Indications for Cardiopulmonary Bypass During Pregnancy and Impact on Fetal Outcomes.

Authors:  S-M Yuan
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Intracardiac surgery in pregnant women.

Authors:  R M Becker
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Homograft aortic root replacement during pregnancy.

Authors:  Kapil Gopal; Ida M Hudson; Jack Ludmir; Michael N Braffman; Stanley Ewing; Joseph E Bavaria; Kar-Lai Wong; Charles R Bridges
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 10.  Cardiopulmonary bypass in pregnancy.

Authors:  F Pomini; D Mercogliano; C Cavalletti; A Caruso; P Pomini
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.330

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cardio-Obstetrics: A Review for the Cardiac Anesthesiologist.

Authors:  Andrea Girnius; Marie-Louise Meng
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass in pregnancy: report of four cases.

Authors:  Youhao You; Shenghua Liu; Zhaohong Wu; Dunjin Chen; Gefei Wang; Gangdong Chen; Youguang Pan; Xing Zheng
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 1.637

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.