| Literature DB >> 32404116 |
Dawei Hou1, Haie Xu2, Bing Yuan1, Jianhui Liu1, Yibing Lu3, Ming Liu4, Zhuyin Qian5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of present study is to assess the effects of active localization and vascular preservation of inferior parathyroid glands in central neck dissection (CND) for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).Entities:
Keywords: Blood vessel preservation; Lymph node excision; Neck dissection; Parathyroid glands; Thyroid cancer, Papillary
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32404116 PMCID: PMC7222446 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01867-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Fig. 11. Inferior parathyroid gland (IPG) of type A1. 2. IPG of type A2. 3. IGP of type B1. 4. IPGSof type B2. 5. IPG of type C. 6. Superior parathyroid gland. 7. Inferior thyroid artery. 8. The tongue of thymus. 9. The recurrent laryngeal nerve. a Area refer to the back surface of inferior pole. b Area indicate the belt occupied by the tongue of thymus and thymus-thyroid ligament. c Area represent tracheoesophageal groove
Fig. 21. Inferior parathyroid gland. 2. Superior parathyroid gland. 3. Inferior thyroid artery. 4. Recurrent laryngeal nerve. 5. Trachea; 6. Esophagus. 7. Thyroid-thymus ligament
General characteristics of the patients
| Groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A group ( | B group( | |||
| Age (years) | 47.66 ± 12.10 | 43.85 ± 13.76 | 0.043# | |
| Gender (female) | 79 (88.8%) | 75 (69.4%) | 0.003▲ | |
| Hashimoto’s disease | 18 (20.2%) | 20 (18.5%) | 0.763▲ | |
| Goiter | 50 (56.2%) | 57 (52.8%) | 0.633▲ | |
| T stage | ||||
| T1 | 63 (70.8%) | 65 (60.2%) | ||
| T2 | 7 (7.9%) | 14 (13.0%) | ||
| T3 | 17 (19.1%) | 23 (21.3%) | ||
| T4 | 2 (2.2%) | 6 (5.6%) | 0.133* | |
| CND range | ||||
| Unilateral CND | 58 (65.2%) | 61 (56.5%) | ||
| Bilateral CND | 31 (34.8%) | 47 (43.5%) | 0.243▲ | |
| Lymph nodes retrieved | ||||
| Unilateral CND | 9.03 ± 4.701 | 10.67 ± 4.668 | 0.059# | |
| Bilateral CND | 14.55 ± 8.045 | 15.23 ± 7.035 | 0.692# | |
| Ratio of metastasis | 43 (48.3%) | 77 (71.3%) | 0.001▲ | |
| Ratio of IPTX | 11 (12.4%) | 8 (7.4%) | 0.241▲ | |
| Ratio of AIPGS | 18 (20.2%) | 11 (10.2%) | 0.048▲ | |
| Pre-PTH (pg/ml) | 43.40 (34.90,58.75) | 43.80 (33.83,60.35) | 0.835 | |
| Pre-Ca (mmol/L) | 2.31 (2.23,2.38) | 2.32 (2.25,2.39) | 0.424 | |
| Postoperative complications | ||||
| Hemorrhage | 1 (1.1%) | 2 (1.9%) | 1.000▲ | |
| Incision infection | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (1.1%) | 1.000▲ | |
| Transient RLN injury | 2 (2.2%) | 3 (2.8%) | 1.000▲ | |
| Permanent RLN injury | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (0.9%) | 1.000▲ | |
| Postoperative hospital stay | 5.20 (± 3.28) | 5.26 (± 2.08) | 0.892# | |
T staging according to 8th edition TNM staging system of AJCC
Ratio of metastasis number of patients with lymph nodes metastasis/number of patients studied, Ratio of IPTX number of patients underwent inadvertent parathyroidectomy pathologically confirmed in specimens/number of patients studied, Ratio of AIPTS number of patients on who auto-transplantation of inferior parathyroid glands were carried out/number of patients studied, Pre-PTH preoperative PTH, Pre-Ca preoperative total calcium
*Mann-Whitney U test
#Student’s t test
▲Pearson chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test
Comparison of postoperative biochemical variables between group A and B
| Biochemical variables | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A ( | Group B ( | |||
| Post-PTH (pg/ml) | 18.80 (8.85, 28.50) | 30.35 (21.25, 42.78) | 5.238 | < 0.001 |
| Post-Ca (mmol/L) | 2.00 (1.89, 2.12) | 2.05 (1.97, 2.13) | 2.339 | 0.019 |
Mann-Whitney U test was employed
Post-PTH postoperative PTH, Post-Ca postoperative total calcium
Fig. 3The serum parathyroid hormone level of the first operative day is demonstrated
Comparison of biochemical variables between group At and Bt
| Biochemical variables | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A ( | Group B ( | |||
| Pre-PTH (pg/ml) | 45.00 (35.43, 58.13) | 41.40 (31.60, 59.80) | 0.652 | 0.515 |
| Post-PTH (pg/ml) | 15.40 (6.85, 24.58) | 18.40 (14.70, 24.30) | 0.472 | 0.637 |
| Pre-Ca (mmol/L) | 2.31 (2.24, 2.38) | 2.37 (2.29, 2.41) | 0.856 | 0.392 |
| Post-Ca (mmol/L) | 1.97 (1.82, 2.05) | 1.99 (1.89, 2.05) | 0.562 | 0.574 |
Mann-Whitney U test was employed
Pre-PTH preoperative PTH, Post-PTH postoperative PTH, Pre-Ca preoperative total calcium, Post-Ca postoperative total calcium