| Literature DB >> 32404087 |
Yasmin Gundelach1, Beate Streuff2, Monika Franczyk3, Marta Kankofer3, Martina Hoedemaker4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dairy cows undergo dramatic changes in endocrine and metabolic status around parturition and in early lactation. Meeting the nutritional requirements of transition dairy cows is important for animal health, production and animal wellbeing. Dry cow feeding and managing play an essential role in this. The changes in metabolism of periparturient cows also lead to a rise in the production of oxidising agents, leading to oxidative stress. The relationship between dry cow diet composition and oxidative stress has received little research attention so far. In the present study, the influence of two different dry cow feedings (single diet with medium energy content over the whole dry period versus traditional two-phase diet with a low-energy "far-off" ration and a high energy "close-up" ration) on dry matter intake, energy intake and plasma protein peroxidative and antioxidative profile was investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Dairy cow; Diet; Dry matter intake; Dry period; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32404087 PMCID: PMC7222456 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02347-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1(a) dry matter intake (DMI) (kg/animal/day); (b) energy intake (EI) (MJ/animal/day); Mean concentrations ± SE of [c] bityrosine bridges (BIT) (mgx103/g Plasmaprotein); (d) formylkinurine (FK) (mgx103/g Plasmaprotein); (e) total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (μmol/g Plasmaprotein); (f) sulfhydryl residues (SH) (mmolx103/g Plasmaprotein) in blood plasma of “one-phase” and “two-phase” fed cows from five weeks a.p. up to six weeks p.p.. Results of the SAS mixed model indicating significant (p<0.05) differences regarding the fixed effects of group, time and group × time are shown in the respective tables under the graphs. * indicates significant differences between groups
Fig. 2Energy-corrected milk yield (ECM, kg/animal/day) of “one-phase” and “two-phase” fed cows in the first six weeks of lactation. Results of the SAS mixed model indicating significant (P < 0.05) differences regarding the fixed effects of group, time and group × time are shown in the respective table under the graph
Nutrient and energy content of the dry cow diets in group 1 and group 2 and the lactating diet
| Nutrient and energy content | Group 1 | Group 2 | Lactation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | Phase 2 | |||
| 466 | 458 | 511 | 477 | |
| 133 | 118 | 152 | 155 | |
| −0.5 | −1.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | |
| 491 | 534 | 414 | 371 | |
| 155 | 99 | 190 | 202 | |
| 5.95 | 5.55 | 6.60 | 6.95 | |
1DM Dry matter; 2uCP Utilisable crude protein; 3RNB Ruminal nitrogen balance; 4aNDFom = Neutral detergent fibre after treatment with amylase and cinefaction;
5degradable XS + XZ = degradable starch + sugar; 6NEL Net energy for lactation, Phase 17 = Date of drying off to two weeks ante partum, Phase 28 = Two weeks ante partum until partus