| Literature DB >> 32403447 |
Samantha Gunasekera1, Alireza Zahedi1, Mark O'Dea2, Brendon King3,4, Paul Monis3,5, Benjamin Thierry5, Jillian M Carr4, Una Ryan1.
Abstract
Cryptosporidium is a major cause of severe diarrhea-related disease in children in developing countries, but currently no vaccine or effective treatment exists for those who are most at risk of serious illness. This is partly due to the lack of in vitro culturing methods that are able to support the entire Cryptosporidium life cycle, which has led to research in Cryptosporidium biology lagging behind other protozoan parasites. In vivo models such as gnotobiotic piglets are complex, and standard in vitro culturing methods in transformed cell lines, such as HCT-8 cells, have not been able to fully support fertilization occurring in vitro. Additionally, the Cryptosporidium life cycle has also been reported to occur in the absence of host cells. Recently developed bioengineered intestinal models, however, have shown more promising results and are able to reproduce a whole cycle of infectivity in one model system. This review evaluates the recent advances in Cryptosporidium culturing techniques and proposes future directions for research that may build upon these successes.Entities:
Keywords: Cryptosporidium; in vitro; organ-on-a-chip; organoid; three-dimensional intestinal model
Year: 2020 PMID: 32403447 PMCID: PMC7285185 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8050715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Diagrammatic representation of the Cryptosporidium life cycle in the intestine.
Figure 2Summary diagram of the main three-dimensional intestinal models described in this review. (a) Cross-section of a hollow fiber cartridge described in Morada et al. [53] with hollow fibers containing host cell-specific medium in lime green, intestinal epithelial cells on the surfaces of each hollow fiber shown in peach and C. parvum-specific medium in the extra-capillary space shown in purple. (b) Cross-section of the silk protein scaffold model described in DeCicco RePass et al. [54] indicating the silk protein bulk space in blue, fibroblasts in the bulk space in orange, enterocytes and goblet cells on the luminal surface in peach and lime green respectively, and growth medium in the lumen in purple. (c) Mouse colon explant described in Baydoun et al. [55] maintained under air-liquid interface culturing conditions with the explant layer shown in peach and growth medium shown in orange. (d) Small intestine organoid described in Heo et al. [56] showing the organoid cultivated in a Matrigel layer indicated in orange and a layer of growth medium shown in peach. (e) Stem cell derived air-liquid interface culture described in Wilke et al. [57] showing growth medium in peach, fibroblast, and Matrigel layers in orange and each intestinal epithelial cell type in different colors. (f) Gut-on-a-chip described in Kim et al. [59] indicating PDMS layers in blue, vacuum chambers in purple, basal, and apical chambers divided by a semi-permeable membrane with growth medium shown in orange and a Caco-2 monolayer on the apical surface of the membrane shown in peach.
Summary table of the advantages and limitations of current in vitro culturing methods of C. parvum.
| In Vitro Culture Method | Full Multiplication Cycle Supported | Maximum Time Growth is Supported | Uses | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Host–Pathogen Interactions | Large Scale Oocyst Production | ||||
| HCT-8 cell lines | No | 25 days | Partially | No | Hijjawi et al. [ |
| Cell-free culture | Yes | 46 days | No | Partially | Hijjawi et al. [ |
| Hollow fiber technology | Yes | <180 days | Partially | Yes | Morada et al. [ |
| Silk-protein scaffold model | Yes | 15 days | Partially | No | DeCicco RePass et al. [ |
| Colon explants | Yes | 27 days | Yes | No | Baydoun et al. [ |
| Lung and small intestine organoids | Yes | 28 days | Yes | No | Heo et al. [ |
| Stem cell-derived cultures | Yes | <20 days | Yes | No | Wilke et al. [ |