| Literature DB >> 32403400 |
Juan Ivorra-Martinez1, Jose Manuel-Mañogil1, Teodomiro Boronat1, Lourdes Sanchez-Nacher1, Rafael Balart1, Luis Quiles-Carrillo1.
Abstract
Eco-efficient Wood Plastic Composites (WPCs) have been obtained using poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hexanoate) (PHBH) as the polymer matrix, and almond shell flour (ASF), a by-product from the agro-food industry, as filler/reinforcement. These WPCs were prepared with different amounts of lignocellulosic fillers (wt %), namely 10, 20 and 30. The mechanical characterization of these WPCs showed an important increase in their stiffness with increasing the wt % ASF content. In addition, lower tensile strength and impact strength were obtained. The field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) study revealed the lack of continuity and poor adhesion among the PHBH-ASF interface. Even with the only addition of 10 wt % ASF, these green composites become highly brittle. Nevertheless, for real applications, the WPC with 30 wt % ASF is the most attracting material since it contributes to lowering the overall cost of the WPC and can be manufactured by injection moulding, but its properties are really compromised due to the lack of compatibility between the hydrophobic PHBH matrix and the hydrophilic lignocellulosic filler. To minimize this phenomenon, 10 and 20 phr (weight parts of OLA-Oligomeric Lactic Acid per one hundred weight parts of PHBH) were added to PHBH/ASF (30 wt % ASF) composites. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) suggested poor plasticization effect of OLA on PHBH-ASF composites. Nevertheless, the most important property OLA can provide to PHBH/ASF composites is somewhat compatibilization since some mechanical ductile properties are improved with OLA addition. The study by thermomechanical analysis (TMA), confirmed the increase of the coefficient of linear thermal expansion (CLTE) with increasing OLA content. The dynamic mechanical characterization (DTMA), revealed higher storage modulus, E', with increasing ASF. Moreover, DTMA results confirmed poor plasticization of OLA on PHBH-ASF (30 wt % ASF) composites, but interesting compatibilization effects.Entities:
Keywords: PHBH; WPCs; almond shell flour; mechanical properties; thermal characterization
Year: 2020 PMID: 32403400 PMCID: PMC7285348 DOI: 10.3390/polym12051097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Visual aspect of almond shell flour particles obtained by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) at 100× and a histogram of their size distribution.
Summary of sample compositions according to the weight content (wt %) of PHBH (Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate)), and ASF (Almond Shell Flour) and the addition of OLA (Oligomeric Lactic Acid) as parts per hundred resin (phr) of PHBH-ASF composite.
| Code | PHBH (wt %) | ASF (wt %) | OLA ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHBH | 100 | - | - |
| PHBH-10ASF | 90 | 10 | - |
| PHBH-20ASF | 80 | 20 | - |
| PHBH-30ASF | 70 | 30 | - |
| PHBH-30ASF/10OLA | 70 | 30 | 10 |
| PHBH-30ASF/20OLA | 70 | 30 | 20 |
Summary of the mechanical properties of the PHBH-ASF/OLA composites with different compositions, in terms of the tensile modulus (E), maximum tensile strength (σ), elongation at break (), Shore-D hardness and impact strength.
| Code | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Elastic Modulus | Elongation at Break | Hardness Shore-D | Impact Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHBH | 20 ± 1 | 1065 ± 23 | 8.1 ± 0.7 | 60.2 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.3 |
| PHBH-10ASF | 16 ± 1 | 1310 ± 35 | 5.2 ± 0.4 | 63.5 ± 0.4 | 1.8 ± 0.2 |
| PHBH-20ASF | 14 ± 1 | 1543 ± 23 | 4.0 ± 0.4 | 64.7 ± 0.6 | 1.7 ± 0.2 |
| PHBH-30ASF | 12 ± 1 | 1744 ± 31 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 66.2 ± 0.6 | 1.6 ± 0.3 |
| PHBH-30ASF/10OLA | 10 ± 1 | 1158 ± 23 | 6.2 ± 0.2 | 58.6 ± 0.5 | 2.4 ± 0.4 |
| PHBH-30ASF/20OLA | 8 ± 1 | 735 ± 28 | 9.7 ± 0.8 | 50.0 ± 0.4 | 2.9 ± 0.3 |
Figure 2Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images at 1000× (left side) and 2500× (right side) corresponding to PHBH-ASF composite with 30 wt % ASF with different OLA content, (a) & (b) 0 phr OLA, (c) & (d) 10 phr OLA, (e) & (f) 20 phr OLA.
Figure 3Comparative plot of the second heating curves obtained by dynamic differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) of the different PHBH-ASF/OLA composites with different compositions.
Main thermal parameters of the PHBH-ASF/OLA composites with different compositions, obtained by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).
| Code | Δ | Δ | Δ |
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.3 ± 0.1 | 54.6 ± 1.1 | 111.5 ± 1.9 | 130.8 ± 2.0 | 162.5 ± 1.2 | 20.3 ± 0.5 | 26.7 ± 0.8 | 33.6 ± 1.3 | 13.9 ± 1.1 | 4.7 ± 0.3 |
|
| −0.5 ± 0.1 | 57.5 ± 1.8 | 112.1 ± 1.8 | 129.7 ± 1.7 | 162.3 ± 1.8 | 19.6 ± 0.4 | 17.4 ± 0.4 | 29.0 ± 2.2 | 14.9 ± 1.1 | 8.8 ± 0.4 |
|
| −1.9 ± 0.2 | 55.5 ± 1.9 | 111.5 ± 2.0 | 129.6 ± 2.1 | 163.4 ± 1.4 | 18.1 ± 0.3 | 15.0 ± 0.1 | 26.4 ± 2.1 | 15.5 ± 0.8 | 9.8 ± 0.7 |
|
| −1.1 ± 0.1 | 51.8 ± 1.2 | 111.3 ± 1.3 | 130.6 ± 1.9 | 164.1 ± 1.2 | 8.5 ± 0.2 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 21.4 ± 0.9 | 8.3 ± 0.7 | 17.3 ± 0.9 |
|
| −5.2 ± 0.2 | 56.3 ± 1.4 | 107.6 ± 2.1 | 127.0 ± 1.8 | 159.4 ± 1.6 | 7.4 ± 0.1 | 11.4 ± 0.1 | 26.1 ± 1.3 | 8.0 ± 0.8 | 14.7 ± 0.8 |
|
| −5.6 ± 0.3 | 62.6 ± 2.0 | 109.9 ± 2.3 | 127.5 ± 2.0 | 157.9 ± 1.5 | 6.4 ± 0.3 | 15.9 ± 0.4 | 22.6 ± 1.5 | 7.5 ± 1.2 | 6.7 ± 0.4 |
* ΔH and X correspond to the first heating scan.
Figure 4Comparative plot of (a) thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves and (b) first derivative (DTG) of the PHBH-ASF/OLA composites with different compositions.
Summary of the main thermal degradation parameters of PHBH-ASF/OLA composites with different compositions, in terms of onset degradation temperature (T), temperature of maximum degradation (T), and residual mass at 700 °C.
| Code | Residual Mass (wt %) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 101.4 * | 300.6/460.7 | 1.5 ± 0.2 |
|
| 286.8 | 308.9 | 2.4 ± 0.3 |
|
| 253.2 | 288.1 | 2.3 ± 0.2 |
|
| 250.5 | 284.3 | 2.1 ± 0.1 |
|
| 223.6 | 279.1 | 2.0 ± 0.3 |
|
| 258.4 | 292.0 | 2.0 ± 0.2 |
|
| 226.3 | 283.5 | 2.0 ± 0.2 |
* Initial weight loss in ASF due to residual water evaporation.
Figure 5Comparative plot of dynamic-mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) curves of PHBH-ASF/OLA composites with different compositions: (a) flexural storage modulus (E’) and (b) dynamic damping factor (tan δ).
Main dynamic-mechanical thermal parameters of PHBH-ASF/OLA composites with different compositions: flexural storage modulus (E’) measured at −40 °C and 25 °C and glass transition temperature (T), obtained by dynamic-mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA).
| Code | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 10.6 ± 0.9 | 1869 ± 42 | 1345 ± 28 |
|
| 14.3 ± 0.8 | 1910 ± 49 | 1431 ± 40 |
|
| 12.0 ± 0.7 | 1948 ± 30 | 1512 ± 20 |
|
| 11.4 ± 0.9 | 2019 ± 52 | 1604 ± 45 |
|
| 9.7 ± 0.7 | 1601 ± 36 | 1352 ± 29 |
|
| 9.3 ± 0.6 | 853 ± 25 | 767 ± 23 |
Summary of the main thermo mechanical properties of neat PHBH and PHBH-ASF/OLA with different compositions, regarding the thermal expansion, obtained by thermomechanical analysis (TMA).
| Code | CLTE (μm m−1 °C−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Below | Above | ||
|
| −0.3 ± 0.1 | 77.1 ± 2.2 | 160.7 ± 2.3 |
|
| 0.2 ± 0.1 | 76.9 ± 2.1 | 157.0 ± 1.3 |
|
| −0.4 ± 0.1 | 75.6 ± 2.1 | 157.4 ± 2.9 |
|
| 1.4 ± 0.2 | 66.8 ± 0.8 | 140.3 ± 2.6 |
|
| −1.3 ± 0.1 | 72.0 ± 0.9 | 169.1 ± 3.8 |
|
| −1.4 ± 0.2 | 90.7 ± 4.1 | 194.3 ± 2.83 |
Figure 6Water uptake of PHBH-ASF/OLA composites with different compositions. Evolution of the water uptake for a period of nine weeks.
Values of the diffusion coefficient (D) and the corrected diffusion coefficient (D) for PHBH and the PHBH-ASF composites processed with OLA.
| Code | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
|
| 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.25 ± 0.02 |
|
| 1.56 ± 0.07 | 0.74 ± 0.04 |
|
| 6.08 ± 0.08 | 2.89 ± 0.05 |
|
| 6.66 ± 0.09 | 3.17 ± 0.07 |
|
| 7.08 ± 0.09 | 3.37 ± 0.03 |