Mina Park1, Yu-Jung Hwang2, Tae-Soo Noh2, Shin-Wook Woo2, Ji-Hoon Park3, Seung Hun Park3, Moon Suk Kim3, Myung-Whan Suh4. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Molecular Science and Technology, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea, drmung@naver.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the biocompatibility of several intra-tympanic (IT) drug delivery vehicles and to compare hearing outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After acute acoustic trauma, rats were treated with IT 10 mg/mL dexamethasone phosphate (D) and divided into the following groups for drug delivery: saline + D (n = 15), hyaluronic acid (HA) + D (n = 17), and methoxy polyethylene glycol-b-polycaprolactone block copolymer (MP) + D (n = 24). RESULTS: No inflammation was found in the saline + D or HA + D groups. The duration of vehicle/drug persistence in the bulla was significantly longer for the MP + D (47.5 days) and HA + D groups (1.8 days) than for the saline + D group (<1 day). The tympanic membrane was significantly thicker in the MP + D group than in the saline + D and HA + D groups. The proportion of ears with good hearing outcome was significantly higher (63.6%) in the HA + D group than in the MP + D group. The number of hair cells in the hearing loss (HL) control group was significantly lower than in the MP + D group. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION: HA shows great potential as a biocompatible vehicle for D delivery via the IT route, without an inflammatory reaction and with better hearing outcomes. Considering inflammation and hearing, MP may not be a good candidate for IT drug delivery.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the biocompatibility of several intra-tympanic (IT) drug delivery vehicles and to compare hearing outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After acute acoustic trauma, rats were treated with IT 10 mg/mL dexamethasone phosphate (D) and divided into the following groups for drug delivery: saline + D (n = 15), hyaluronic acid (HA) + D (n = 17), and methoxy polyethylene glycol-b-polycaprolactone block copolymer (MP) + D (n = 24). RESULTS: No inflammation was found in the saline + D or HA + D groups. The duration of vehicle/drug persistence in the bulla was significantly longer for the MP + D (47.5 days) and HA + D groups (1.8 days) than for the saline + D group (<1 day). The tympanic membrane was significantly thicker in the MP + D group than in the saline + D and HA + D groups. The proportion of ears with good hearing outcome was significantly higher (63.6%) in the HA + D group than in the MP + D group. The number of hair cells in the hearing loss (HL) control group was significantly lower than in the MP + D group. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION:HA shows great potential as a biocompatible vehicle for D delivery via the IT route, without an inflammatory reaction and with better hearing outcomes. Considering inflammation and hearing, MP may not be a good candidate for IT drug delivery.