Literature DB >> 32403055

Intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine and quality of recovery after elective surgery in adult patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Mengrong Miao1, Yuehua Xu1, Bing Li1, Enqiang Chang1, Liyuan Zhang1, Jiaqiang Zhang2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pre- and perioperative intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for enhancing quality of recovery (as measured by 40-item quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-40), ranged from 40 to 200) after surgery.
DESIGN: Meta-analysis.
SETTING: Adult patients undergoing elective surgery. INTERVENTION: Intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine during pre- and perioperative period. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was quality of recovery after surgery. The secondary outcome was the incidence of dexmedetomidine-related adverse events. MAIN
RESULTS: Moderate to low quality evidence suggested that dexmedetomidine (DEX) increased the quality of recovery after surgery (WMD, weighted mean difference 15.71, 95% CI, confidence interval 0.43 to 31.00; 428 participants; 5 RCTs; low quality evidence), decreased the incidence of postoperative nauseas or vomiting (RR, risk ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.83; 404 participants; 6 RCTs; moderate quality evidence; RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.55; 356 participants; 5 RCTs; moderate quality evidence) without increased risk of bradycardia (RR: 1.78, 95% CI 0.78 to 4.02; 275 participants; 4 RCTs; moderate quality evidence), dizziness (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.00; 183 participants; 3 RCTs; moderate quality evidence), pruritus (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.39 to 4.44; 186 participants; 3 RCTs; moderate quality evidence), hypotension requiring an intervention (RR: 1.48, 95% CI, 0.68 to 3.23; 254 participants; 3 RCTs; moderate quality evidence) and longer length of hospital stay (WMD: -0.75 days, 95% CI -1.95 to 0.44; 246 participants; 3 RCTs; low quality evidence) in early postoperative period.
CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjuvant to general anesthesia was associated with an enhanced quality of recovery (15.71; far more than a clinically significant improvement of 6.3) without increased risk of adverse events in the early postoperative period (moderate to low quality evidence). Further large sample and high quality RCTs are needed to confirm the current findings.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dexmedetomidine; Meta-analysis; Quality of recovery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32403055     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  2 in total

Review 1.  Association of peripheral nerve blocks with patient-reported quality of recovery in female patients receiving breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Kuo-Chuan Hung; Ching-Chung Ko; Jen-Yin Chen; Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Chih-Wei Hsu; Yu-Li Pang
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.713

2.  Evaluation of lignocaine, dexmedetomidine, lignocaine-dexmedetomidine infusion on pain and quality of recovery for robotic abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pudi Sivaji; Sanjay Agrawal; Ajay Kumar; Anupama Bahadur
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-11-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.