Literature DB >> 32402605

Counterpoint. Early intervention for psychosis risk syndromes: Minimizing risk and maximizing benefit.

Scott W Woods1, Carrie E Bearden2, Fred W Sabb3, William S Stone4, John Torous5, Barbara A Cornblatt6, Diana O Perkins7, Kristin S Cadenhead8, Jean Addington9, Albert R Powers10, Daniel H Mathalon11, Monica E Calkins12, Daniel H Wolf12, Cheryl M Corcoran13, Leslie E Horton14, Vijay A Mittal15, Jason Schiffman16, Lauren M Ellman17, Gregory P Strauss18, Daniel Mamah19, Jimmy Choi20, Godfrey D Pearlson21, Jai L Shah22, Paolo Fusar-Poli23, Celso Arango24, Jesus Perez25, Nikolaos Koutsouleris26, Jijun Wang27, Jun Soo Kwon28, Barbara C Walsh29, Thomas H McGlashan29, Steven E Hyman30, Raquel E Gur12, Tyrone D Cannon10, John M Kane6, Alan Anticevic10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malhi et al. in this issue critique the clinical high risk (CHR) syndrome for psychosis.
METHOD: Response to points of critique.
RESULTS: We agree that inconsistency in CHR nomenclature should be minimized. We respectfully disagree on other points. In our view: a) individuals with CHR and their families need help, using existing interventions, even though we do not yet fully understand disease mechanisms; b) substantial progress has been made in identification of biomarkers; c) symptoms used to identify CHR are specific to psychotic illnesses; d) CHR diagnosis is not "extremely difficult"; e) the pattern of progression, although heterogenous, is discernible; f) "psychosis-like symptoms" are common but are not used to identify CHR; and g) on the point described as 'the real risk,' CHR diagnosis does not frequently cause harmful stigma. DISCUSSION: Malhi et al.'s arguments do not fairly characterize progress in the CHR field nor efforts to minimize stigma. That said, much work remains in areas of consistent nomenclature, mechanisms of disease, dissecting heterogeneity, and biomarkers. With regard to what the authors term the "real risk" of stigma associated with a CHR "label," however, our view is that avoiding words like "risk" and "psychosis" reinforces the stigma that both they and we mean to oppose. Moreover, patients and their families benefit from being given a term that describes what is happening to them.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomy; Beneficence; Biomarkers; Clinical high risk (CHR); Psychosis; Stigma

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32402605      PMCID: PMC8218020          DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.662


  88 in total

1.  Long-term validity of the At Risk Mental State (ARMS) for predicting psychotic and non-psychotic mental disorders.

Authors:  P Fusar-Poli; G Rutigliano; D Stahl; C Davies; A De Micheli; V Ramella-Cravaro; I Bonoldi; P McGuire
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 5.361

2.  Telling the diagnosis to cancer patients in Japan: attitude and perception of patients, physicians and nurses.

Authors:  M Seo; K Tamura; H Shijo; E Morioka; C Ikegame; K Hirasako
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 3.  P300 as an index of transition to psychosis and of remission: Data from a clinical high risk for psychosis study and review of literature.

Authors:  Yingying Tang; Junjie Wang; Tianhong Zhang; Lihua Xu; Zhenying Qian; Huiru Cui; Xiaochen Tang; Huijun Li; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Martha E Shenton; Larry J Seidman; Robert W McCarley; Matcheri S Keshavan; William S Stone; Jijun Wang; Margaret A Niznikiewicz
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Lack of Diagnostic Pluripotentiality in Patients at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Specificity of Comorbidity Persistence and Search for Pluripotential Subgroups.

Authors:  Scott W Woods; Albert R Powers; Jerome H Taylor; Charlie A Davidson; Jason K Johannesen; Jean Addington; Diana O Perkins; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Thomas H McGlashan
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  The "prodromal" patient: both symptomatic and at-risk.

Authors:  S W Woods; T J Miller; T H McGlashan
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.790

6.  Internalized stigma, emotional dysfunction and unusual experiences in young people at risk of psychosis.

Authors:  Melissa Pyle; Suzanne L K Stewart; Paul French; Rory Byrne; Paul Patterson; Andrew Gumley; Max Birchwood; Anthony P Morrison
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.732

7.  Prevention of Psychosis: Advances in Detection, Prognosis, and Intervention.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo; Christoph U Correll; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Mark J Millan; Stefan Borgwardt; Silvana Galderisi; Andreas Bechdolf; Andrea Pfennig; Lars Vedel Kessing; Therese van Amelsvoort; Dorien H Nieman; Katharina Domschke; Marie-Odile Krebs; Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Philip McGuire; Kim Q Do; Celso Arango
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 21.596

8.  Towards a Standard Psychometric Diagnostic Interview for Subjects at Ultra High Risk of Psychosis: CAARMS versus SIPS.

Authors:  P Fusar-Poli; M Cappucciati; G Rutigliano; T Y Lee; Q Beverly; I Bonoldi; J Lelli; S J Kaar; E Gago; M Rocchetti; R Patel; V Bhavsar; S Tognin; S Badger; M Calem; K Lim; J S Kwon; J Perez; P McGuire
Journal:  Psychiatry J       Date:  2016-05-30

Review 9.  The conception of the ABCD study: From substance use to a broad NIH collaboration.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; George F Koob; Robert T Croyle; Diana W Bianchi; Joshua A Gordon; Walter J Koroshetz; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; William T Riley; Michele H Bloch; Kevin Conway; Bethany G Deeds; Gayathri J Dowling; Steven Grant; Katia D Howlett; John A Matochik; Glen D Morgan; Margaret M Murray; Antonio Noronha; Catherine Y Spong; Eric M Wargo; Kenneth R Warren; Susan R B Weiss
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 6.464

10.  Prevalence and clinical relevance of interview-assessed psychosis-risk symptoms in the young adult community.

Authors:  Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Chantal Michel; Stephan Ruhrmann; Benno G Schimmelmann
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  5 in total

1.  Toward Generalizable and Transdiagnostic Tools for Psychosis Prediction: An Independent Validation and Improvement of the NAPLS-2 Risk Calculator in the Multisite PRONIA Cohort.

Authors:  Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Michelle Worthington; Dominic B Dwyer; Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic; Rachele Sanfelici; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Marlene Rosen; Stephan Ruhrmann; Alan Anticevic; Jean Addington; Diana O Perkins; Carrie E Bearden; Barbara A Cornblatt; Kristin S Cadenhead; Daniel H Mathalon; Thomas McGlashan; Larry Seidman; Ming Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Peter Falkai; Rebekka Lencer; Alessandro Bertolino; Joseph Kambeitz; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Eva Meisenzahl; Raimo K R Salokangas; Jarmo Hietala; Paolo Brambilla; Rachel Upthegrove; Stefan Borgwardt; Stephen Wood; Raquel E Gur; Philip McGuire; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Full speed ahead on indicated prevention of psychosis.

Authors:  Scott W Woods; Jimmy Choi; Daniel Mamah
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Community Psychosis Risk Screening: An Instrument Development Investigation.

Authors:  Lauren M Ellman; Jason Schiffman; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  J Psychiatr Brain Sci       Date:  2020-08-20

4.  New Electronic Health Records Screening Tools to Improve Detection of Emerging Psychosis.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Prevention of psychosis: moving on from the at-risk mental state to universal primary prevention.

Authors:  Robin M Murray; Anthony S David; Olesya Ajnakina
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 7.723

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.