Literature DB >> 32402578

Characteristics of Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Risk of Surgical Site Infections in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Ryley K Zastrow1, Hsin-Hui Huang2, Leesa M Galatz3, Patricia Saunders-Hao4, Jashvant Poeran2, Calin S Moucha3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous antibiotic prophylaxis options for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), an assessment of practice patterns and comparative effectiveness is lacking. We aimed to characterize antibiotic utilization patterns and associations with infection risk and hypothesized differences in infection risk based on regimen.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from 436,724 THA and 862,918 TKA (Premier Healthcare Database; 2006-2016). Main exposures were antibiotic type and duration: day of surgery only (day 0) or through postoperative day 1 (day 1). The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI) <30 days postoperation. Mixed-effect models measured associations between prophylaxis regimen and SSI as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: SSI prevalence was 0.21% (n = 914) for THA and 0.22% (n = 1914) for TKA. Among THA procedures, the most commonly used antibiotics were cefazolin (74.1%), vancomycin (8.4%), "other" antibiotic combinations (7.1%), vancomycin + cefazolin (5.1%), and clindamycin (3.3%). Here, 51.8% received prophylaxis on day 0 only, whereas 48.2% received prophylaxis through day 1. Similar patterns existed for TKA. Relative to cefazolin, higher SSI odds were seen with vancomycin (OR = 1.36; CI 1.09-1.71) in THA and with vancomycin (OR = 1.29; CI = 1.10-1.52), vancomycin + cefazolin (OR = 1.35; CI = 1.12-1.64), clindamycin (OR = 1.38; CI = 1.11-1.71), and "other" antibiotic combinations (OR = 1.28; CI = 1.07-1.53) in TKA. Prophylaxis duration did not alter SSI odds. Results were corroborated in sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION: Antibiotic prophylaxis regimens other than cefazolin were associated with increased SSI risk among THA/TKA patients. These findings emphasize a modifiable intervention to mitigate infection risk.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibiotics; infection; prophylaxis; total hip arthroplasty; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32402578     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery; has the time to reconsider the current practice arrived?

Authors:  Elisha Krasin; Yaniv Warschawski; Samuel Morgan; Michal Dekel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  A validated LC-MS/MS method for the quantitation of cefazolin in human adipose tissue: Application of EMR-Lipid sorbent as an efficient sample clean-up before mass spectrometric analyses.

Authors:  Anna Siemiątkowska; Andrew Wassef; Ragui Sadek; Celine Park; Christine Yohn; Luigi Brunetti; Leonid Kagan
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.571

3.  Increased Rate of Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Hip Arthroplasty With the Use of Alternatives to Cefazolin Despite Additional Gram-Negative Coverage.

Authors:  Dionisio Ortiz; Greg M Teo; Katherine Lygrisse; Vinay K Aggarwal; William J Long
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-03-20

Review 4.  Risk factors associated with surgical site infections following joint replacement surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  Tao Li; Haining Zhang; Ping Keung Chan; Wing Chiu Fung; Henry Fu; Kwong Yuen Chiu
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-05-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.