| Literature DB >> 32402293 |
Barbara K Felber1, Zhongyan Lu2, Xintao Hu2, Antonio Valentin3, Margherita Rosati3, Christopher A L Remmel4, Joshua A Weiner4, Margaret C Carpenter4, Katelyn Faircloth4, Sherry Stanfield-Oakley5, Wilton B Williams6, Xiaoying Shen6, Georgia D Tomaras7, Celia C LaBranche8, David Montefiori8, Hung V Trinh9, Mangala Rao10, Munir S Alam6, Nathan A Vandergrift6, Kevin O Saunders8, Yunfei Wang6, Wes Rountree6, Jishnu Das11, Galit Alter11, Steven G Reed12, Pyone P Aye13, Faith Schiro13, Bapi Pahar13, Jason P Dufour13, Ronald S Veazey13, Preston A Marx14, David J Venzon15, George M Shaw16, Guido Ferrari5, Margaret E Ackerman4, Barton F Haynes17, George N Pavlakis18.
Abstract
We compare immunogenicity and protective efficacy of an HIV vaccine comprised of env and gag DNA and Env (Envelope) proteins by co-administration of the vaccine components in the same muscles or by separate administration of DNA + protein in contralateral sites in female rhesus macaques. The 6-valent vaccine includes gp145 Env DNAs, representing six sequentially isolated Envs from the HIV-infected individual CH505, and matching GLA-SE-adjuvanted gp120 Env proteins. Interestingly, only macaques in the co-administration vaccine group are protected against SHIV CH505 acquisition after repeated low-dose intravaginal challenge and show 67% risk reduction per exposure. Macaques in the co-administration group develop higher Env-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. Non-neutralizing Env antibodies, ADCC, and antibodies binding to FcγRIIIa are associated with decreased transmission risk. These data suggest that simultaneous recognition, processing, and presentation of DNA + Env protein in the same draining lymph nodes play a critical role in the development of protective immunity. Published by Elsevier Inc.Entities:
Keywords: ADCC; DNA; FcγR; HIV; Indian rhesus macaques; antibody; cellular immunity; humoral immunity; protein; vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32402293 PMCID: PMC7329227 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107624
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Rep Impact factor: 9.423