Literature DB >> 32401933

Sensitivity and specificity of assessment scales of dentin hypersensitivity - an accuracy study.

Mariana Oliveira Cotta Rocha1, Aléxia Aguiar Carvalho Fonseca Cruz1, Daniella Oliveira Santos1, Dhelfeson Willya Douglas-DE-Oliveira1, Olga Dumont Flecha1, Patricia Furtado Gonçalves1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of pain scales used to assess dentin hypersensitivity (DH). The preferred scale, and toothbrushing habits of participants were also investigated. This cross-sectional study was conducted with students and employees of a Brazilian Federal University who presented DH. The participants answered a questionnaire about their toothbrushing and drinking habits. Hypersensitive and non-sensitive teeth were submitted to tactile and ice stick stimuli. Then, the subjects marked their pain level in the visual analogue (VAS), numeric scale (NS), faces pain scale (FPS) and verbal evaluation scale (VES). DH was also assessed by Schiff scale (SS). The data were analyzed by Wilcoxon and Chi-Square tests, as well as by ROC curve. The mean age of the sample (56 women, 16 men) was 27.8 years. The most prevalent acidic beverage was coffee (36.0%) and the most preferred scale was the NS (47.2%). The pain level was statistically higher in teeth with DH compared to teeth without DH (p < 0.05). The accuracy ranged from 0.729 (SS) to 0.750 (NS). The highest sensitivity value was 81.9% for NS. The SS presented the highest specificity (91%). The visual analog, numerical, verbal evaluation, faces pain, and Schiff scales were accurate for DH diagnosis. The Schiff scale was the preferred scale for DH assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32401933     DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  5 in total

1.  The prevalence, clinical features, and related factors of dentin hypersensitivity in the Turkish population.

Authors:  Mustafa Demirci; Ferda Karabay; Meriç Berkman; İlknur Özcan; Safa Tuncer; Neslihan Tekçe; Canan Baydemir
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Long-Term Effectiveness of Treating Dentin Hypersensitivity with Bifluorid 10 and Futurabond U: A Split-Mouth Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Marta Mazur; Maciej Jedliński; Artnora Ndokaj; Roman Ardan; Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Gianna Maria Nardi; Livia Ottolenghi; Fabrizio Guerra
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Home Oral Care with Biomimetic Hydroxyapatite vs. Conventional Fluoridated Toothpaste for the Remineralization and Desensitizing of White Spot Lesions: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Andrea Butera; Simone Gallo; Maurizio Pascadopoli; Mona A Montasser; Mohammad H Abd El Latief; Gioia Giada Modica; Andrea Scribante
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity Using Three Different Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials in Non-carious Cervical Lesions: A Split-Mouth Design In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Radhika Gupta; Aditya Patel; Pradnya Nikhade; Manoj Chandak; Rutuja Rajnekar; Meghna Dugar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-10

5.  Dental Disorders and Salivary Changes in Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  Sabrina Casciaro; Matteo Gelardi; Rossana Giancaspro; Vitaliano Nicola Quaranta; Giuseppe Porro; Brigida Sterlicchio; Antonia Abbinante; Massimo Corsalini
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.