Literature DB >> 32401707

Comparison of bupivacaine alone and in a combination with lidocaine for caudal block in patients undergoing circumcision: A historical cohort study.

Ayşe Gülşah Atasever1, Okan Ermiş2, Bilge Şencan Demir3, Kamber Kaşali4, Meltem Savran Karadeniz5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Optimal analgesia following ambulatory surgery is an important matter in patient satisfaction, and it reduces unnecessary hospital admissions. This study investigated whether a caudal block with bupivacaine alone or in a combination with lidocaine can alter postoperative pain scores, complications, and peroperative and postoperative analgesic consumption.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study that included children who underwent elective circumcision surgery under general anesthesia and caudal analgesia between January and June 2018. Among the 103 children, 17 cases were not analyzed due to an unsuccessful caudal block and procedures simultaneously underwent another operation unrelated to circumcision. We divided the study participants into two groups according to the type of local anesthetic applied: 0.5 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine (Group B) and 0.5 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine + 3 mg/kg 1% lidocaine (Group BL) caudally.
RESULTS: Pain scores were similar between these groups and remained in the mild-to-moderate range throughout the hospitalization (p>0.05). There were significant differences regarding the rescue analgesic use, first micturition, and mobilization times (p<0.001). In addition, we applied the multivariable logistic regression for fentanyl consumption adjusted for first mobilization and micturition time, unlike mobilization, a significantly increased risk for postoperative delayed micturition (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.0-1.12; p=0.038) was found with intra-operative intravenous fentanyl use.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the caudal block with a lidocaine+bupivacaine combination decreases rescue analgesic consumption at day-case surgery. In circumcision procedures, the caudal block is an effective and safe analgesic method for intraoperative and postoperative pain control with no side effects. This trial was registered at Clinicaltrals.gov, NCT03911648.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32401707      PMCID: PMC7219969          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.19191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  21 in total

Review 1.  Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review.

Authors:  B De Jonghe; D Cook; C Appere-De-Vecchi; G Guyatt; M Meade; H Outin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Modern day-case anaesthesia for children.

Authors:  L J Brennan
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Quantitative assessment of motor block in labouring women receiving epidural analgesia.

Authors:  A C Graham; J H McClure
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Buffered lidocaine and bupivacaine mixture - the ideal local anesthetic solution?

Authors:  Corliss A Best; Alyssa A Best; Timothy J Best; Danielle A Hamilton
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 5.  The European society of regional anesthesia and pain therapy and the American society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine joint committee practice advisory on controversial topics in pediatric regional anesthesia I and II: what do they tell us?

Authors:  Per-Arne Lönnqvist; Claude Ecoffey; Adrian Bosenberg; Santhanam Suresh; Giorgio Ivani
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 6.  Regional anesthesia and pain management for the pediatric patient.

Authors:  Nancy B Samol; James S Furstein; David L Moore
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2012

7.  Plasma lidocaine concentrations during continuous thoracic epidural anesthesia after clonidine premedication in children.

Authors:  S Inomata; E Tanaka; M Miyabe; Y Kakiuchi; A Nagashima; Y Yamasaki; S Nakayama; Y Baba; H Toyooka; K Okuyama; Y Kohda
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  The national pediatric epidural audit.

Authors:  N Llewellyn; A Moriarty
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.556

9.  Addition of ketamine to propofol for initiation of procedural anesthesia in children reduces propofol consumption and preserves hemodynamic stability.

Authors:  M T Aouad; A R Moussa; C M Dagher; S A Muwakkit; S I Jabbour-Khoury; R A Zbeidy; M R Abboud; G E Kanazi
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.105

10.  Procedural Pain Scale Evaluation (PROPoSE) study: protocol for an evaluation of the psychometric properties of behavioural pain scales for the assessment of procedural pain in infants and children aged 6-42 months.

Authors:  Dianne J Crellin; Denise Harrison; Adrian Hutchinson; Tibor Schuster; Nick Santamaria; Franz E Babl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.