Literature DB >> 32401314

Comparison of Common Respiratory Virus Peak Incidence Among Varying Age Groups in Rhode Island, 2012-2016.

Young June Choe1,2, Michael A Smit1,3,4, Leonard A Mermel5,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32401314      PMCID: PMC7221508          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Although children and young adults appear to drive the spread of influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in community settings,[1,2,3] this issue remains unclear.[4] We assessed the seasonality of respiratory viral infections with respect to age in 1 locale.

Methods

The study was approved by the Rhode Island Hospital institutional review board and was granted a waiver of informed consent because it involves the use of secondary data. This study follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline. This cross-sectional case series involved detection of respiratory viruses among different age groups in Rhode Island. Data were derived from respiratory specimens sent to the Lifespan Microbiology Laboratory from inpatients and outpatients assessed at a Lifespan facility, which was licensed for 1165 beds and 757 380 outpatient visits in 2017, as well as patient specimens from other outpatient facilities throughout Rhode Island. All respiratory viruses positively identified in the laboratory by use of the respiratory viral panel and rapid influenza or RSV tests were reviewed. Adenovirus, coronavirus (not coronavirus disease 2019), influenza, parainfluenza, RSV, and human metapneumovirus were included for analysis. The weekly number of positive tests between January 2012 and December 2016 was extracted to construct a longitudinal case series for 4 age groups: 0 to 4 years, 5 to 17 years, 18 to 64 years, and 65 years and older. Analyses were performed using R Studio statistical software version 1.2.503 (R Project for Statistical Computing). Data analysis was performed from December 2018 to April 2019. Time series analysis and cross-correlation analysis were applied to determine the detection of respiratory viruses in the age group with the highest incidence and its correlation with detection in different age groups. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 and was calculated with linear regression and 2-sided Fisher exact tests.

Results

A total of 6733 respiratory viruses were detected and were predominantly detected in the following weeks: adenovirus, multiple peaks; coronavirus, weeks 50 to 7 (560 of 677 cases [83%]); influenza virus, weeks 50 to 9 (1487 of 1825 cases [84%]); parainfluenza virus, multiple weeks; RSV, weeks 48 to 11 (2198 of 2278 cases [97%]); and human metapneumovirus, weeks 1 to 17 (950 of 1017 cases [93%]) (Figure). With the exception of influenza virus, which first started in the 18- to 64-year age group, most respiratory virus infections occurred in the 0- to 4-year age group before other age groups, including peak detection of the coronavirus (Table). The Table shows the number and percentage of total cases, the lagged period (in weeks) with respect to the reference age group (ie, 0-4 years for adenovirus), and their mean (SE) correlation coefficients with statistical significance. In the 65 years and older age group, peak detection of influenza virus, parainfluenza virus, and human metapneumovirus occurred 3 weeks after peak detection in the 0- to 4-year age group (mean [SE] correlation coefficient, 0.215 [0.064]; P = .001), 4 weeks after peak detection in the 5- to 17-year age group (mean [SE] correlation coefficient, 0.155 [0.044]; P < .001), and 2 weeks after peak detection in the 18- to 64-year age group (mean [SE] correlation coefficient, 0.139 [0.038]; P < .001), respectively. Peak detection of RSV in the 65 years and older age group occurred 4 weeks after peak detection in the 0- to 4-year age group (mean [SE] correlation coefficient, 0.079 [0.021]; P < .001).
Figure.

Seasonality of Respiratory Viruses Among Different Age Groups

Graphs show number of cases of infection by surveillance week for adenovirus (A), coronavirus (B), influenza virus (C), parainfluenza virus (D), respiratory syncytial virus (E), and human metapneumovirus (F).

Table.

Cross-Correlation Between Age Groups in Detection of Respiratory Viruses

Virus and age group, yTotal cases, No. (%)Lag period after detection in the reference group, wkCorrelation coefficient, mean (SE)P value
Adenovirus (n = 582)
0-4358 (61.5)[Reference]
5-17103 (17.7)100.112 (0.033).001
18-6489 (15.3)10.076 (0.031).02
≥6532 (5.5)10.036 (0.016).02
Coronavirus (n = 677)
0-4254 (37.5)[Reference]
5-1759 (8.7)40.070 (0.027).01
18-64192 (28.4)50.152 (0.040)<.001
≥65172 (25.4)50.147 (0.045).001
Influenza virus (n = 1825)
0-4249 (13.6)10.153 (0.027)<.001
5-17271 (14.8)10.188 (0.033)<.001
18-64665 (36.4)[Reference]
≥65640 (35.1)30.215 (0.064).001
Parainfluenza virus (n = 1036)
0-4496 (47.9)[Reference]
5-1795 (9.2)10.053 (0.022).02
18-64220 (21.2)10.089 (0.035).01
≥65225 (21.7)40.155 (0.044)<.001
Respiratory syncytial virus (n = 2278)
0-41612 (70.8)[Reference]
5-17104 (4.6)40.023 (0.010).02
18-64237 (10.4)40.067 (0.016)<.001
≥65325 (14.3)30.079 (0.021)<.001
Human metapneumovirus (n = 1017)
0-4430 (42.3)[Reference]
5-1777 (7.6)10.085 (0.022)<.001
18-64252 (24.8)10.170 (0.041)<.001
≥65258 (25.4)20.139 (0.038)<.001

Seasonality of Respiratory Viruses Among Different Age Groups

Graphs show number of cases of infection by surveillance week for adenovirus (A), coronavirus (B), influenza virus (C), parainfluenza virus (D), respiratory syncytial virus (E), and human metapneumovirus (F).

Discussion

We found that the detection of RSV in the youngest age group, for whom the incidence first peaked, was correlated with its detection in older age groups weeks later. This finding was similar to that of a Belgian study[4] that found peak RSV detection in elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) 6 weeks after peak detection in young children (aged <6 years). In contrast, a study from Hong Kong[3] found no age synchrony, suggesting that geographic, climactic, and/or cultural differences (eg, mixing between different age groups or social interactions) may play a role in determining the epidemiology of RSV. A Canadian study[1] found that peak influenza activity occurred in the 10- to 19-year age group before other age groups. A study[5] of social contact networks suggests that this may reflect the high number of contact level hours among high school students being the local transmission driver of influenza. However, we identified peak detection of influenza virus initially in adults aged 18 to 64 years. It is unclear whether this reflects differences in past exposure to the influenza virus strains circulating during our study period,[6] or whether there is another yet unidentified explanation. We also found that, like other respiratory viruses, coronavirus first peaked among young children aged 0 to 4 years and then was followed by a peak among children aged 5 to 17 years. It is important to learn the transmission dynamics of coronavirus to guide policy making on public health countermeasures for the current coronavirus 2019 pandemic. The cases analyzed in our study were all medically attended illnesses, which do not reflect asymptomatic cases or all mild cases in the community. Moreover, detection bias is possible because health care practitioners may have been more likely to test for respiratory virus detection in children compared with adults. Despite these limitations, our study sought to identify the relationships of seasonality of multiple respiratory viruses in different age groups. Future studies are needed to develop a conceptual model for age-specific epidemiology of respiratory viruses and their interactions within the population.
  6 in total

1.  Prevalence and seasonality of six respiratory viruses during five consecutive epidemic seasons in Belgium.

Authors:  Kaat Ramaekers; Els Keyaerts; Annabel Rector; Annie Borremans; Kurt Beuselinck; Katrien Lagrou; Marc Van Ranst
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 2.  Immune history and influenza virus susceptibility.

Authors:  Sarah Cobey; Scott E Hensley
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 7.090

3.  Age-specific differences in influenza A epidemic curves: do children drive the spread of influenza epidemics?

Authors:  Dena Schanzer; Julie Vachon; Louise Pelletier
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Age-specific epidemic waves of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in a subtropical city.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Kwok Hung Chan; Lorna K P Suen; King Pan Chan; Xiling Wang; Peihua Cao; Daihai He; J S Malik Peiris; Chit Ming Wong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Impact of the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic on Age-Specific Epidemic Curves of Other Respiratory Viruses: A Comparison of Pre-Pandemic, Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Periods in a Subtropical City.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Kwok Hung Chan; Lorna K P Suen; King Pan Chan; Xiling Wang; Peihua Cao; Daihai He; J S Malik Peiris; Chit Ming Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Social contact networks for the spread of pandemic influenza in children and teenagers.

Authors:  Laura M Glass; Robert J Glass
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Decline of Influenza and Respiratory Viruses With COVID-19 Public Health Measures: Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Alexander Doroshenko; Nelson Lee; Clayton MacDonald; Nathan Zelyas; Leyla Asadi; Jamil N Kanji
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Antibiotic Resistance Patterns and Association With the Influenza Season in the United States: A Multicenter Evaluation Reveals Surprising Associations Between Influenza Season and Resistance in Gram-Negative Pathogens.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; Kalvin C Yu; Heidi Kabler; Janet A Watts; Amine Amiche
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.835

3.  Contact Tracing during Coronavirus Disease Outbreak, South Korea, 2020.

Authors:  Young Joon Park; Young June Choe; Ok Park; Shin Young Park; Young-Man Kim; Jieun Kim; Sanghui Kweon; Yeonhee Woo; Jin Gwack; Seong Sun Kim; Jin Lee; Junghee Hyun; Boyeong Ryu; Yoon Suk Jang; Hwami Kim; Seung Hwan Shin; Seonju Yi; Sangeun Lee; Hee Kyoung Kim; Hyeyoung Lee; Yeowon Jin; Eunmi Park; Seung Woo Choi; Miyoung Kim; Jeongsuk Song; Si Won Choi; Dongwook Kim; Byoung-Hak Jeon; Hyosoon Yoo; Eun Kyeong Jeong
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 6.883

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.