BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Racial disparities in health and socioeconomic characteristics of older adults have implications for the experiences of their family and unpaid caregivers, but knowledge to date has primarily drawn from convenience samples. Using a population-based sample, we examine associations between caregiver race and caregiving-related effects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Study participants include white (n = 992) and black (n = 556) respondents to the 2015 National Study of Caregiving who assisted community-dwelling older adults with disabilities who participated in the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Guided by Pearlin's Stress Process Model, hierarchical logistic regression models were constructed to examine race differences in caregiving-related effects after adjusting for caregiving context, stressors, and resources. RESULTS: Relative to white caregivers, blacks more often provided in excess of 40 hr of care per week (54.3% vs 38.6%) and more often cared for an older adult with dementia (27.1% vs 20.7%) who was living below the federal poverty line (31.7% vs 11.9%) or was Medicaid-eligible (42.2% vs 11.8%). Black caregivers more often used supportive services (32.9% vs 24.8%). In fully adjusted regression models, black caregivers were more likely to report gains and less likely to report emotional difficulty than whites. Service utilization did not attenuate caregiving-related emotional difficulty or participation restrictions, regardless of race. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings highlight caregiving disparities and counterintuitive differences in experiences and indicate the importance of identifying supports such as paid family leave and faith and community-based programming to better support community-dwelling low-income older adults and their family and unpaid caregivers.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Racial disparities in health and socioeconomic characteristics of older adults have implications for the experiences of their family and unpaid caregivers, but knowledge to date has primarily drawn from convenience samples. Using a population-based sample, we examine associations between caregiver race and caregiving-related effects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Study participants include white (n = 992) and black (n = 556) respondents to the 2015 National Study of Caregiving who assisted community-dwelling older adults with disabilities who participated in the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Guided by Pearlin's Stress Process Model, hierarchical logistic regression models were constructed to examine race differences in caregiving-related effects after adjusting for caregiving context, stressors, and resources. RESULTS: Relative to white caregivers, blacks more often provided in excess of 40 hr of care per week (54.3% vs 38.6%) and more often cared for an older adult with dementia (27.1% vs 20.7%) who was living below the federal poverty line (31.7% vs 11.9%) or was Medicaid-eligible (42.2% vs 11.8%). Black caregivers more often used supportive services (32.9% vs 24.8%). In fully adjusted regression models, black caregivers were more likely to report gains and less likely to report emotional difficulty than whites. Service utilization did not attenuate caregiving-related emotional difficulty or participation restrictions, regardless of race. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings highlight caregiving disparities and counterintuitive differences in experiences and indicate the importance of identifying supports such as paid family leave and faith and community-based programming to better support community-dwelling low-income older adults and their family and unpaid caregivers.
Authors: Ganesh M Babulal; Yakeel T Quiroz; Benedict C Albensi; Eider Arenaza-Urquijo; Arlene J Astell; Claudio Babiloni; Alex Bahar-Fuchs; Joanne Bell; Gene L Bowman; Adam M Brickman; Gaël Chételat; Carrie Ciro; Ann D Cohen; Peggye Dilworth-Anderson; Hiroko H Dodge; Simone Dreux; Steven Edland; Anna Esbensen; Lisbeth Evered; Michael Ewers; Keith N Fargo; Juan Fortea; Hector Gonzalez; Deborah R Gustafson; Elizabeth Head; James A Hendrix; Scott M Hofer; Leigh A Johnson; Roos Jutten; Kerry Kilborn; Krista L Lanctôt; Jennifer J Manly; Ralph N Martins; Michelle M Mielke; Martha Clare Morris; Melissa E Murray; Esther S Oh; Mario A Parra; Robert A Rissman; Catherine M Roe; Octavio A Santos; Nikolaos Scarmeas; Lon S Schneider; Nicole Schupf; Sietske Sikkes; Heather M Snyder; Hamid R Sohrabi; Yaakov Stern; Andre Strydom; Yi Tang; Graciela Muniz Terrera; Charlotte Teunissen; Debora Melo van Lent; Michael Weinborn; Linda Wesselman; Donna M Wilcock; Henrik Zetterberg; Sid E O'Bryant Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-12-13 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Betty S Black; Deirdre Johnston; Peter V Rabins; Ann Morrison; Constantine Lyketsos; Quincy M Samus Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Chanee D Fabius; Kali S Thomas; Tingting Zhang; Jessica Ogarek; Theresa I Shireman Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Anny T H R Fenton; Katherine A Ornstein; Peggye Dilworth-Anderson; Nancy L Keating; Erin E Kent; Kristin Litzelman; Andrea C Enzinger; Julia H Rowland; Alexi A Wright Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-10-03 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Katherine E M Miller; Sally C Stearns; Courtney H VAN Houtven; Donna Gilleskie; George M Holmes; Erin E Kent Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Tetyana Pylypiv Shippee; Chanee D Fabius; Shekinah Fashaw-Walters; John R Bowblis; Manka Nkimbeng; Taylor I Bucy; Yinfei Duan; Weiwen Ng; Odichinma Akosionu; Jasmine L Travers Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Scott G Ravyts; Timothy S Sannes; Joseph M Dzierzewski; Eric S Zhou; Benjamin W Brewer; Crystal Natvig; Mark L Laudenslager Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 3.955
Authors: María P Aranda; Ian N Kremer; Ladson Hinton; Julie Zissimopoulos; Rachel A Whitmer; Cynthia Huling Hummel; Laura Trejo; Chanee Fabius Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-07 Impact factor: 7.538