Literature DB >> 32400519

Relative contributions of melanopsin to brightness discrimination when hue and luminance also vary.

Tanner DeLawyer, Sei-Ichi Tsujimura, Keizo Shinomori.   

Abstract

A large number of studies have shown the effect of melanopsin-dependent retinal ganglion cells on humans performing brightness discrimination tasks. These studies often utilized targets that only differ in their melanopsin activation levels, and not in their luminance or hue, which are both factors that make large contributions to brightness discrimination. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relative contribution of melanopsin activation to brightness discrimination when luminance and hue are also varying in addition to melanopsin activation. Using an apparatus consisting of three separate high luminance projectors, we were able to manipulate melanopsin-isolating stimulation, and L-, M-, and S-cone stimulation separately, thus allowing us to vary stimuli in their melanopsin activation, luminance, and hue category independently. We constructed three sets of target stimuli with three different levels of melanopsin activation (100%, 131%, and 167% relative melanopsin excitation) and five levels of luminance. We then had subjects do a two-alternative forced choice task where they compared the previously described target stimuli set to a set of four comparison stimuli that varied in their hue category but had identical luminances. We found that in our stimuli set the overall contribution of melanopsin activity to brightness discrimination was small (an average of 6% increase in likelihood to call a high melanopsin activity stimulus brighter compared to a low melanopsin activity stimulus) when luminance and hue also varied. However, a significant interaction showed that when the comparison was between stimuli differing only in melanopsin stimulation (with luminance and hue unchanged) the contribution of melanopsin to brightness judgments was about 3 times larger (an average of 18% increase in likelihood to call a high melanopsin activity stimulus brighter compared to a low melanopsin activity stimulus). This suggests that although luminance and hue have large effects on brightness discrimination such that the melanopsin contribution can become hard to detect, when there are minimal cone-dependent signals available, melanopsin can make a large contribution to brightness discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32400519     DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.382349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  4 in total

1.  Selective amplification of ipRGC signals accounts for interictal photophobia in migraine.

Authors:  Harrison McAdams; Eric A Kaiser; Aleksandra Igdalova; Edda B Haggerty; Brett Cucchiara; David H Brainard; Geoffrey K Aguirre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Melanopsin photoreception differentially modulates rod-mediated and cone-mediated human temporal vision.

Authors:  Samir Uprety; Prakash Adhikari; Beatrix Feigl; Andrew J Zele
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-03

Review 3.  Plasticity in perception: insights from color vision deficiencies.

Authors:  Zoey J Isherwood; Daniel S Joyce; Mohana Kuppuswamy Parthasarathy; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Fac Rev       Date:  2020-11-13

4.  Melanopic stimulation does not alter psychophysical threshold sensitivity for luminance flicker.

Authors:  Joris Vincent; Edda B Haggerty; David H Brainard; Geoffrey K Aguirre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.