Rachel M Ceballos1, Sarah D Hohl1,2, Yamile Molina3, Bridgette Hempstead4, Jacci Thompson-Dodd5, Shauna Weatherby6, Rachel C Malen1. 1. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA. 2. Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 3. School of Public Health, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 4. Cierra Sisters, Inc, Renton, Washington, USA. 5. WeSpeakLoudly, Seattle, Washington, USA. 6. Women's Health Specialists, Multicare Health System, Tacoma, WA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the emotional experience of African American breast cancer survivors (BCS), and the information exchange between providers and patients, during transitioning to post-treatment survivorship. RESEARCH APPROACH: We conducted a qualitative study using interviews and focus groups. PARTICIPANTS: We sought perspectives of oncology providers (n = 27) and African-American breast cancer survivors (BCS) (n = 45) who provided and received care in three counties in Washington State. METHODS: African-American community consultants conducted interviews and focus groups. Thematic coding and constant comparison were applied to identify emergent themes. FINDINGS: Participants reported emotional health information and support were needed but not consistently provided, resulting in a sense of survivor isolation. Systemic challenges limited providers' ability to deliver emotional support information. Survivors and providers expressed similar understandings of the emotional impact of transition, but each group highlighted different, yet complementary priorities to address emotional needs of African-American BCS. CONCLUSIONS: There is congruence between African-American BCS and oncology providers perceptions of the emotional experience of transitioning to post-treatment survivorship, but patients are not receiving adequate information and resources to help them adequately address their emotional needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY: Improved care continuity, team-based approaches, and partnerships between health systems and community organization partnerships may help patients and providers recognize and address emotional needs during the transition.
PURPOSE: To examine the emotional experience of African American breast cancer survivors (BCS), and the information exchange between providers and patients, during transitioning to post-treatment survivorship. RESEARCH APPROACH: We conducted a qualitative study using interviews and focus groups. PARTICIPANTS: We sought perspectives of oncology providers (n = 27) and African-American breast cancer survivors (BCS) (n = 45) who provided and received care in three counties in Washington State. METHODS: African-American community consultants conducted interviews and focus groups. Thematic coding and constant comparison were applied to identify emergent themes. FINDINGS: Participants reported emotional health information and support were needed but not consistently provided, resulting in a sense of survivor isolation. Systemic challenges limited providers' ability to deliver emotional support information. Survivors and providers expressed similar understandings of the emotional impact of transition, but each group highlighted different, yet complementary priorities to address emotional needs of African-American BCS. CONCLUSIONS: There is congruence between African-American BCS and oncology providers perceptions of the emotional experience of transitioning to post-treatment survivorship, but patients are not receiving adequate information and resources to help them adequately address their emotional needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY: Improved care continuity, team-based approaches, and partnerships between health systems and community organization partnerships may help patients and providers recognize and address emotional needs during the transition.
Entities:
Keywords:
African American; breast cancer; minorities; qualitative research; survivorship
Authors: Timothy D Gilligan; Marilyn A Carrington; Thomas P Sellers; Luis Casal; Lowell E Schnipper; Frederick P Li Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Julia H Rowland; Erin E Kent; Laura P Forsythe; Jon Håvard Loge; Lars Hjorth; Adam Glaser; Vittorio Mattioli; Sophie D Fosså Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Marium Husain; Timiya S Nolan; Kevin Foy; Raquel Reinbolt; Cassandra Grenade; Maryam Lustberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Lawrence A Palinkas; Sarah M Horwitz; Carla A Green; Jennifer P Wisdom; Naihua Duan; Kimberly Hoagwood Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2015-09
Authors: Nancy K Janz; Mahasin S Mujahid; Sarah T Hawley; Jennifer J Griggs; Ann S Hamilton; Steven J Katz Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Catherine M Alfano; Corinne R Leach; Tenbroeck G Smith; Kim D Miller; Kassandra I Alcaraz; Rachel S Cannady; Richard C Wender; Otis W Brawley Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Beti Thompson; Sarah D Hohl; Yamile Molina; Electra D Paskett; James L Fisher; Ryan D Baltic; Chasity M Washington Journal: Curr Breast Cancer Rep Date: 2018-08-29
Authors: Lynn Chollet-Hinton; Carey K Anders; Chiu-Kit Tse; Mary Beth Bell; Yang Claire Yang; Lisa A Carey; Andrew F Olshan; Melissa A Troester Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 6.466