Cláudia Oliveira-Ferreira1, Mariana Azevedo2, Marta Silva3, Ana Roca2, João Barbosa-Breda3,4,5, Pedro Alves Faria3, Fernando Falcão-Reis3,6, Amândio Rocha-Sousa3,6. 1. Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Oporto, Portugal. mofclaudia@gmail.com. 2. Faculty of Medicine of Porto University, Oporto, Portugal. 3. Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Oporto, Portugal. 4. Cardiovascular R&D Center, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Oporto, Portugal. 5. Department of Neurosciences, Research Group Ophthalmology, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium. 6. Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Porto University, Oporto, Portugal.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Unexplained visual loss after removal of silicone oil from the eye has been described. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of unexplained loss of visual acuity after SO removal and to provide possible explanations for this phenomenon. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients that underwent vitreoretinal surgery, at Centro Hospitalar São João, between January of 2012 and October of 2018. Inclusion criterion was vitreoretinal surgery in which the chosen endotamponade was SO, followed by removal of SO and exchange with balanced salt solution (BSS) or air. After SO removal, patients with documented loss of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) on two or more Snellen lines were analyzed and patients in which the cause of the visual loss was identified, namely OHT (intraocular pressure > 21 mmHg), retinal re-detachment, glaucoma, retinal proliferative membrane formation, or corneal decompensation, were excluded. All patients with unexplained visual loss underwent spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) to exclude causes of visual reduction such as cystoid macular edema, epiretinal membrane, or ellipsoid/interdigitation zone disruption. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 46 eyes underwent SO tamponade and SO removal during the study period. In 34.8% of the cases (n = 16) there was visual acuity loss in at least two Snellen lines. Of 46 eyes, 23.9% (n = 11) showed vision loss due to known secondary causes. Unexplained loss of visual acuity after SO removal occurred in 10.9% of cases. OHT during silicone endotamponade (p = 0.046) and silicone emulsification (p = 0.001) were identified as factors associated with unexplained visual loss after SO removal. CONCLUSION: Unexplained loss of visual acuity after SO removal occurred in 10.9% of cases. OHT during silicone endotamponade and SO emulsification were identified as important factors in the ethology of this phenomenon.
INTRODUCTION: Unexplained visual loss after removal of silicone oil from the eye has been described. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of unexplained loss of visual acuity after SO removal and to provide possible explanations for this phenomenon. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients that underwent vitreoretinal surgery, at Centro Hospitalar São João, between January of 2012 and October of 2018. Inclusion criterion was vitreoretinal surgery in which the chosen endotamponade was SO, followed by removal of SO and exchange with balanced salt solution (BSS) or air. After SO removal, patients with documented loss of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) on two or more Snellen lines were analyzed and patients in which the cause of the visual loss was identified, namely OHT (intraocular pressure > 21 mmHg), retinal re-detachment, glaucoma, retinal proliferative membrane formation, or corneal decompensation, were excluded. All patients with unexplained visual loss underwent spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) to exclude causes of visual reduction such as cystoid macular edema, epiretinal membrane, or ellipsoid/interdigitation zone disruption. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 46 eyes underwent SO tamponade and SO removal during the study period. In 34.8% of the cases (n = 16) there was visual acuity loss in at least two Snellen lines. Of 46 eyes, 23.9% (n = 11) showed vision loss due to known secondary causes. Unexplained loss of visual acuity after SO removal occurred in 10.9% of cases. OHT during silicone endotamponade (p = 0.046) and silicone emulsification (p = 0.001) were identified as factors associated with unexplained visual loss after SO removal. CONCLUSION: Unexplained loss of visual acuity after SO removal occurred in 10.9% of cases. OHT during silicone endotamponade and SO emulsification were identified as important factors in the ethology of this phenomenon.
Authors: Mariantonia Ferrara; Giulia Coco; Tania Sorrentino; Kirti M Jasani; George Moussa; Francesco Morescalchi; Felipe Dhawahir-Scala; Francesco Semeraro; David H W Steel; Vito Romano; Mario R Romano Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-09-05 Impact factor: 4.964