| Literature DB >> 32399799 |
Maureen E Lyon1,2,3, Leah Squires4, Rachel K Scott5, Debra Benator6,4, Linda Briggs7, Isabella Greenberg8, Lawrence J D'Angelo9,6, Yao Iris Cheng10, Jichuan Wang6,10.
Abstract
Trial tested effect of advance care planning on family/surrogates' understanding of patients' end-of-life treatment preferences longitudinally. A multisite, assessor-blinded, intent-to-treat, parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical trial in five hospital-based HIV clinics enrolled 449 participants aged 22 to 77 years during October 2013-March 2017. Patients living with HIV/family dyads were randomized at 2:1 ratio to 2 weekly ~ 60-min sessions either ACP (n = 155 dyads)-(1) ACP facilitated conversation, (2) Advance directive completion; or Control (n = 68 dyads)-(1) Developmental/relationship history, (2) Nutrition/exercise tips. ACP families/surrogates were more likely to accurately report patients' treatment preferences at Time 1 (T1) and 12 months post-intervention (T2) compared to controls, experiencing high congruence longitudinally (high→high transition), [63·6% vs 37·7% (difference = 25·9%, 95% CI: 11·3%, 40·4%, χ2 = 11·52, p = 0·01)], even as patients' preferences changed over time. ACP families/surrogates had eight times the odds of controls of having an excellent understanding of patients' treatment preferences (Adjusted Odds Ratio 7.91, 95%CI: 3.08, 20.3). Conversations matter.Entities:
Keywords: AIDS; Advance care planning; Congruence; HIV; Palliative care; Randomized clinical trial
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32399799 PMCID: PMC7699823 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-020-02909-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Behav ISSN: 1090-7165