Literature DB >> 32399462

The Efficacy and Safety of a Promising Single-Channel Endoscopic Closure Technique for Endoscopic Treatment-Related Artificial Ulcers: A Pilot Study.

Yosuke Minoda1, Eikichi Ihara1, Haruei Ogino1, Keishi Komori1, Yoshihiro Otsuka1, Hiroko Ikeda1, Mitsuru Esaki1, Takatoshi Chinen1, Takahiro Matsuguchi2, Shunsuke Takahashi3, Noriko Shiga4, Rie Yoshimura4, Yoshihiro Ogawa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is important to appropriately manage patients with procedure-related artificial mucosal ulcers or procedure-related complications. Many endoscopic closure techniques have been reported; however, they often require the use of special devices. We developed a single-channel endoscopic closure technique (SCCT) that can be performed with conventional devices. In the present study, we describe the technique and evaluate its efficacy.
METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic treatment and whose artificial ulcer was closed using the SCCT were enrolled in this study. The technical success rate, number of clips for closure, procedure time, complication rate on the day of the procedure, clinical success rates on days 1 and 5, and incidence of severe stenosis of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract at 2 months after the procedure were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median ulcer diameter was 20 mm. The tumor locations were the stomach (n = 19), jejunum (n = 1), and colon (n = 5). The technical success rate was 100% (25/25), and the rate of incomplete closure was 0% (0/25). Eight clips were needed on average. The median procedure time was 18 min (range 5-49 min). The complication rate was 0% (25/25). The clinical success rates on days 1 and 5 were 100% (19/19) and 100% (9/9), respectively. No patients presented stenosis as a late complication at 2 months after the procedure (0/25).
CONCLUSION: The SCCT could be applied in the treatment of artificial ulcers in several parts of the GI tract with a high clinical success rate and no complications. The SCCT appears to be a good option for closing artificial mucosal ulcers.
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial mucosal ulcers; Complete closure; Endoloop; Single-channel endoscopic closure technique

Year:  2019        PMID: 32399462      PMCID: PMC7206593          DOI: 10.1159/000503994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors        ISSN: 2296-3774


  28 in total

1.  Endoscopic closure of a colonic defect using a novel endoloop system via a single-channel endoscope.

Authors:  Jiankun Wang; Xiang Wang; Li Liu; Lili Zhao; Min Wang; Zhenzhen Liu; Zhining Fan
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Efficacy of an over-the-scope clip for preventing adverse events after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective interventional study.

Authors:  Tomoaki Tashima; Ken Ohata; Eiji Sakai; Yoshitsugu Misumi; Maiko Takita; Yohei Minato; Yasushi Matsuyama; Takashi Muramoto; Hitoshi Satodate; Hajime Horiuchi; Nobuyuki Matsuhashi; Kouichi Nonaka; Shomei Ryozawa
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Delayed perforation: a hazardous complication of endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal neoplasm.

Authors:  Takuya Inoue; Noriya Uedo; Takeshi Yamashina; Sachiko Yamamoto; Noboru Hanaoka; Yoji Takeuchi; Koji Higashino; Ryu Ishihara; Hiroyasu Iishi; Masaharu Tatsuta; Hidenori Takahashi; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Hiroaki Ohigashi
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 7.559

4.  Clinical impact of closure of the mucosal defect after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Motohiko Kato; Yasutoshi Ochiai; Seiichiro Fukuhara; Tadateru Maehata; Motoki Sasaki; Yoshiyuki Kiguchi; Teppei Akimoto; Ai Fujimoto; Atsushi Nakayama; Takanori Kanai; Naohisa Yahagi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Endoscopic full-thickness resection for early colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Armin Kuellmer; Julius Mueller; Karel Caca; Patrick Aepli; David Albers; Brigitte Schumacher; Anne Glitsch; Claus Schäfer; Ingo Wallstabe; Christopher Hofmann; Andreas Erhardt; Benjamin Meier; Dominik Bettinger; Robert Thimme; Arthur Schmidt
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 6.  The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Young-Mi Park; Eun Cho; Hye-Young Kang; Jong-Mann Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A multicenter survey of the management after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection related to postoperative bleeding.

Authors:  Osamu Goto; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Ichiro Oda; Naomi Kakushima; Yorimasa Yamamoto; Yosuke Tsuji; Ken Ohata; Takashi Fujiwara; Junko Fujiwara; Naoki Ishii; Chizu Yokoi; Shinichi Miyamoto; Toshiyuki Itoh; Shinji Morishita; Takuji Gotoda; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a single-center study (with video).

Authors:  Fan-Sheng Meng; Zhao-Hong Zhang; Yan-Yun Hong; De-Jian Li; Jie-Qiong Lin; Xin Chen; Feng Ji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Feasibility of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection with continuous low-dose aspirin for patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.

Authors:  Hideaki Harada; Satoshi Suehiro; Daisuke Murakami; Ryotaro Nakahara; Takuya Nagasaka; Tetsuro Ujihara; Ryota Sagami; Yasushi Katsuyama; Kenji Hayasaka; Yuji Amano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Sealed endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric cancer: a pilot study in an ex vivo and in vivo porcine model.

Authors:  Hidekazu Kitakata; Tohru Itoh; Shinichi Kinami; Ken Kawaura; Kazu Hamada; Sadafumi Azukisawa; Rika Kobayashi; Junji Kamai; Takeo Kosaka
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-01-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Negligible procedure-related dissemination risk of mucosal incision-assisted biopsy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy.

Authors:  Yosuke Minoda; Eikichi Ihara; Soichi Itaba; Yorinobu Sumida; Kazuhiro Haraguchi; Akira Aso; Takahiro Mizutani; Takashi Osoegawa; Mitsuru Esaki; Shuzaburo Nagatomo; Kei Nishioka; Kazumasa Muta; Xiaopeng Bai; Haruei Ogino; Nao Fujimori; Daisuke Tsurumaru; Kenoki Ohuchida; Hu Qingjiang; Eiji Oki; Hidetaka Yamamoto; Yoshihiro Ogawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Efficacy of ultrasound endoscopy with artificial intelligence for the differential diagnosis of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Yosuke Minoda; Eikichi Ihara; Nao Fujimori; Shuzaburo Nagatomo; Mitsuru Esaki; Yoshitaka Hata; Xiaopeng Bai; Yoshimasa Tanaka; Haruei Ogino; Takatoshi Chinen; Qingjiang Hu; Eiji Oki; Hidetaka Yamamoto; Yoshihiro Ogawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.