Literature DB >> 32398898

Agroecology and the emergence of a post COVID-19 agriculture.

Miguel A Altieri1,2, Clara Ines Nicholls1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32398898      PMCID: PMC7215132          DOI: 10.1007/s10460-020-10043-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Agric Human Values        ISSN: 0889-048X            Impact factor:   3.295


× No keyword cloud information.
For years agroecologists have warned that industrial agriculture became too narrow ecologically, highly dependent on outside inputs, and extremely vulnerable to insect pests, diseases, climate change and now as demonstrated by the COVID19 pandemic prone to a complete shut down by unforeseen crisis. Like never before, COVID19 has revealed how closely linked human, animal and ecological health are. As a powerful systemic approach, agroecology reveals that the way we practice agriculture can provide opportunities for improving environmental and human health, but if done wrongly, agriculture can cause major risks to health. The last pandemics (African swine fever, novel influenza H1N1) were all linked to large scale animal production which creates opportunities for many viruses to mutate and spread. The practices at these industrial operations not only leave animals more susceptible to viral infections, but can sponsor the conditions by which pathogens can evolve to more infectious types. The massive and indiscriminate use of antibiotics and growth promoters in industrial livestock models makes things worst by creating pathogenic strains resistant to such to drugs. Like many viruses, various super bacteria are in line for the next pandemics, for which there are no control products available. The situation is aggravated, as large scale monocultures advance at the expense of natural habitats which can lead to disease emergence. Deforestation led by modern agriculture triggers processes by which previously boxed-in pathogens in natural environments are spilling over into livestock and human communities. Today three crop species, wheat, rice, and corn provide more than 50% of the calories consumed globally, comprising a low value diet, which significantly impacts the food security, nutritional status and health particularly of poor and vulnerable people. Many countries are losing their food security as the corporate globalized food system has disrupted the diversified food production systems managed by peasants, As a consequence there is a shift from traditional diverse and rich diets to highly processed, energy dense, micro-nutrient-poor foods. Obesity and diet-related chronic diseases have proliferated. Large-scale crop monocultures are highly vulnerable to pest, weed and disease epidemics, and rely on injections of about 2.3bn kg of pesticides yearly, posing major risks to the general population through toxic residues in the food supply. Many insecticides lead to declines in pollinators and natural enemies of pests that contribute key ecosystem services to agriculture. This loss of biodiversity costs hundreds of billions of dollars annually in crop production and human health. In most countries restrictions on travel, trade and lockdown of entire cities has constrained the influx of imported foods with devastating consequences on the poor’s access to meals. This is problematic in cities with 10 million or more people which need to import 6000 tons of food per day, traveling on average about 1000 km. Food supplies are also impacted in countries dependent on migrant farmworkers who are particularly vulnerable to COVID19 and if they get sick they cannot get to the fields for harvesting and planting. A sharp decline in trucking and air traffic has limited the capacity to move fresh produce long distances, thus getting plentiful supplies to people, many of whom have suddenly lost their income, is a major challenge. Paradoxically food is being dumped as demand from closed restaurants, schools, stadiums, theme parks and cruise ships has plummeted. Clearly COVID19 has revealed the socio-ecological fragility of current industrial-globalized food systems and the effects on farming and food supply chains raises concerns about widespread food shortages and price spikes. A transition to more socially just, ecologically resilient, localized food systems is urgently needed. Agroecology depicts a different way forward by providing the principles on how to design and manage agricultural systems best able to withstand future crises—whether pest outbreaks, pandemics, climate disruptions, or financial meltdowns. Agroecology offers the best agricultural system able to cope with future challenges by exhibiting high levels of diversity and resilience while delivering reasonable yields and ecosystem services. Agroecology promotes the restoration of the landscapes in which farming systems are embedded, which enriches the ecological matrix creating “ecological firebreaks” that may help contain pathogens from ecological release. Evidence shows that agroecology restores the production capacities of small scale farmers, by suppressing pests and weeds and enhancing soil fertility in ecological ways. By producing stable crop yields with low external inputs, biodiverse farms generate income and dietary diversity thus improving smallholders livelihoods. The amplification of agroecology is key for the food sovereignty of most communities, as small farmers who control only 30% of the global arable land, produce between 50 and 70% of the food consumed in most countries. Agroecology also promotes alternative livestock production systems such as silvopastoral systems, which ensure healthy animal production, in addition, restore landscapes and are less conducive to promoting epidemics. Antibiotics are not used in these systems, since animals live outdoors and their diet is based on natural foods that come from healthy soils, thus strengthening the immune systems of these animals. Agroecology can also improve the productivity of urban agriculture thus contributing to local food security and nutrition, especially in underserved communities. Urban food production will expand as more people realize that in time of crisis, access to locally produced food is strategic. Eating nutritious, plant-based foods derived from local organic farms can fortify people’s immune systems. In the face of COVID 19, agroecology is positioning itself as the only agricultural path that can provide rural families with significant socioeconomic and environmental benefits, while feeding the urban masses, equitably and sustainably. Agroecology entails a fundamentally different vision on the way we produce and consume food, while contributing to the creation of equitable food systems. Eating is an ecological and political act, so that when consumers support local farmers, instead of the corporate food chain which is more vulnerable than small farmer food webs, they create socio- ecological sustainability and resilience. The key point here is whether the crisis unfolded by COVID19 will provide the impetus to change industrial agriculture for a transition towards agroecologically based food systems. Transformational change in agriculture must be accompanied by a shift from a market economy to a solidarity economics, from fossil fuels to renewable energies, from big corporations to cooperatives, etc. Such new world will be led by social movements aware that a return to the way agriculture was before the pandemics is not an option; instead they will be actively involved in developing local alternatives to consolidate sustainable and healthy agrolandscapes.
  7 in total

1.  Dynamic Conservation in Risk Society: A Case Study of COVID-19 Pandemic Risk in Kashan Qanat Irrigated Agriculture.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Manian; Korous Khoshbakht; Hossein Mahmoudi; Houman Liaghati
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  Eating habits of children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: The impact of social isolation.

Authors:  Michelle Teixeira Teixeira; Raquel Santiago Vitorino; Julia Holandino da Silva; Letícia Martins Raposo; Luana Azevedo de Aquino; Simone Augusta Ribas
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.995

3.  The Impact of COVID-19 on Rural Food Supply and Demand in Australia: Utilising Group Model Building to Identify Retailer and Customer Perspectives.

Authors:  Jillian Whelan; Andrew Dwight Brown; Lee Coller; Claudia Strugnell; Steven Allender; Laura Alston; Josh Hayward; Julie Brimblecombe; Colin Bell
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Prioritizing high-contact occupations raises effectiveness of vaccination campaigns.

Authors:  Hendrik Nunner; Arnout van de Rijt; Vincent Buskens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Economic Shock and Agri-Sector: Post-COVID-19 Scenario in India.

Authors:  Hagera Dilnashin; Hareram Birla; Vishnu D Rajput; Chetan Keswani; Surya P Singh; Tatiana M Minkina; Saglara S Mandzhieva
Journal:  Circ Econ Sustain       Date:  2021-11-23

6.  Diversity regained: Precautionary approaches to COVID-19 as a phenomenon of the total environment.

Authors:  Marco P Vianna Franco; Orsolya Molnár; Christian Dorninger; Alice Laciny; Marco Treven; Jacob Weger; Eduardo da Motta E Albuquerque; Roberto Cazzolla Gatti; Luis-Alejandro Villanueva Hernandez; Manuel Jakab; Christine Marizzi; Lumila Paula Menéndez; Luana Poliseli; Hernán Bobadilla Rodríguez; Guido Caniglia
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 10.753

Review 7.  Systematic review on ensuring the global food security and covid-19 pandemic resilient food systems: towards accomplishing sustainable development goals targets.

Authors:  Keerththana Kumareswaran; Guttila Yugantha Jayasinghe
Journal:  Discov Sustain       Date:  2022-08-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.