Literature DB >> 32398118

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of Hurthle cell carcinoma: a population based study.

Xingtong Zhou1, Zhibo Zheng2, Chuyan Chen3, Bangbo Zhao4, Hongtao Cao4, Tianhao Li4, Xudong Liu5, Weibin Wang6, Yongning Li7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thyroid Hurthle cell carcinoma (HCC) is a rare disease with high risk of invasion and metastasis and poor prognosis. The clinical characteristics, prognosis and treatment of HCC are still controversial, and clinical data are still limited to some case reports. Therefore, understanding the characteristics and survival factors of HCC is clinically necessary.
METHODS: This study collected data from HCC patients diagnosed pathologically from 2004 to 2015, including basic population characteristics, tumor characteristics, and epidemiological and survival data. The data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to conduct a population cohort study.
RESULTS: A total of 2101 HCC patients with an average age of 55.42 ± 15.27 years were enrolled in this study. Of them, 1740 (82.82%) patients had local disease, 245 (11.66%) had regional disease, and 89 (4.24%) had distant disease. Total thyroidectomy was performed in 1669 (79.44%) patients, partial thyroidectomy was performed in 382 (18.18%) patients, and radioactive iodine (RAI) was used in 1155 (54.97%) patients. The 5-year and 10-year cancer-specific survival rate was 95.4 and 92.6%, respectively. The distant disease group had significantly more male patients, multifocal tumors, and extensive tumors compared to the local disease group. Multivariate survival analysis showed that age (P < 0.05), SEER stage (P < 0.001), and T-stage (P = 0.001) had significant effects on survival. There was no significant difference in survival between total and partial thyroidectomy (P = 0.078), or between RAI and non-RAI (P = 0.733).
CONCLUSION: Male gender, multifocal tumors, and extended tumors are associated with increased risk of late stage HCC. Age over 45 years, distant SEER stage, and late T-stage are independent risk factors for mortality in HCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SEER database; Survival factors; Thyroid Hurthle cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32398118      PMCID: PMC7216584          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06915-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


Background

Oxyphilic cells, also known as Hurthle cells, are present in some thyroid tumors and nontumor tissues, such as thyroiditis and nodular goiter [1]. Thyroid oxyphilic tumors, also known as Hurthle cell tumors, refer to those thyroid tumors that entirely or predominantly (> 75%) consist of oxyphilic thyroid follicular cells [2]. Thyroid oxyphilic tumors have been identified by the World Health Organization as a special type of tumor of the thyroid follicles that are distinguished from thyroid follicular tumors [3]. Thyroid oxyphilic tumors can be benign (Hurthle cell adenoma) or malignant (Hurthle cell carcinoma, HCC). HCC is characterized by capsule invasion and/or vascular invasion. Hurthle cell adenocarcinoma is a rare invasive thyroid malignancy, accounting for 3 to 4% of all thyroid malignancies. Compared to differentiated thyroid carcinoma, HCC has high risk of lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis and is less sensitive to radioiodine therapy [4, 5]. HCC is a rare disease with unique pathological characteristics and biological behaviors. There is still no consensus on its best surgical treatment method. Our study aimed to find out the characteristics and survival factors of HCC by analyzing patient data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods

Data collection

All patients diagnosed with oxyphilic adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2015 according to the International Classification of Disease were identified in the SEER database. Data of patient demographics, surgeries, postoperative treatments, tumor pathology, SEER stage, and disease-specific survival were collected. The SEER stage was used for tumor staging [6].

Statistical analysis

Demographic, tumor features, and treatment methods were summarized with descriptive statistics. Continuous data are presented as means and standard deviations. Categorical data are presented as counts or percentages. Comparisons of the continuous data were made using the one-way ANOVA test followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test for between three groups or using the independent student t-test for between two groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the relative impacts of risk factors for HCC. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed for cancer-specific mortality, while the differences between the curves were tested by the log-rank test. All statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) or GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 3084 HCC patients were identified in the database, accounting for 2.4% of all differentiated thyroid carcinoma and 6.67% of follicular thyroid carcinoma patients in the same period. Among them, 2101 patients had comprehensive detailed information and were included in the analysis. Patients were divided into three groups according to the SEER stage (local, regional, and distant). The patient characteristics are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Patient characteristics

Patient number, n2101
Age, year55.42 ± 15.27
Gender, n (%)
 Male606 (28.84)
 Female1495 (71.16)
Age, year
  < 45508 (24.18)
  ≥ 451593 (75.82)
Race, n (%)
 White1736 (82.63)
 Black188 (8.95)
 American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian/Pacific Islander144 (6.85)
 Unknown33 (1.57)
SEER stagea, n (%)
 Local1740 (82.82)
 Regional245 (11.66)
 Distant89 (4.24)
 Unspecified27 (1.28)
Lymph node examination, n (%)
 Not examined1406 (66.92)
 Negative574 (27.32)
 Positive92 (4.38)
 Unspecified29 (1.38)
Tumor grade, n (%)
 Well differentiated282 (13.42)
 Moderately differentiated80 (3.81)
 Poorly differentiated41 (1.95)
 Undifferentiated13 (0.62)
 Unspecified1685 (80.20)
Tumor multifocalityb, n (%)
 No1657 (78.87)
 Yes352 (16.75)
 Unspecified92 (4.38)
Tumor extension, n (%)
 Intrathyroidal1768 (84.15)
 Extrathyroidal301 (14.33)
 Unspecified32 (1.52)
T-stage, n (%)
 T1486 (23.13)
 T2707 (33.65)
 T3708 (33.70)
 T498 (4.66)
 Unspecified102 (4.85)
N-stage, n (%)
 N01913 (91.05)
 N1113 (5.38)
 Unspecified75 (3.57)
M-stage, n (%)
 M01995 (94.95)
 M159 (2.81)
 Unspecified47 (2.24)
Surgery, n (%)
 No29 (1.38)
 Total thyroidectomy1669 (79.44)
 Partial thyroidectomy382 (18.18)
 Unspecified21 (0.99)
Radiotherapy, n (%)
 No850 (40.46)
 Radioactive iodine1155 (54.97)
 Unspecified96 (4.57)

SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results

aThe local stage includes localized disease only. The regional stage includes regional disease by direct extension only, regional lymph nodes only, and regional disease by both direct extension and lymph node involvement. The distant stage includes disease that involve distant sites and/or lymph nodes

bThe tumor has multiple centers, and the foci are not contiguous

Patient characteristics SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results aThe local stage includes localized disease only. The regional stage includes regional disease by direct extension only, regional lymph nodes only, and regional disease by both direct extension and lymph node involvement. The distant stage includes disease that involve distant sites and/or lymph nodes bThe tumor has multiple centers, and the foci are not contiguous

Comparison of patients with different SEER stages

There was significant difference in age between patients with different SEER stages (P < 0.001; Table 2). The distant group had significantly more patients with male sex (P = 0.001), tumor multifocality (P < 0.001), and tumor extension (P < 0.001) compared to the local group (P < 0.001; Table 2). We also found that the TNM stage was consistent with the SEER stage (Table 2).
Table 2

Patients with different SEER stages

CharacteristicsLocal disease (n = 1740)Regional disease (n = 245)Distant disease (n = 89)P-valuePa-valuePb-valuePc-value
Age (year)54 ± 14.861 ± 17.169 ± 13.5< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
Gender, n (%)0.0010.0100.3700.005
Male476 (27.4)87 (35.5)37 (41.6)
Female1264 (72.6)158 (64.5)52 (58.4)
Race, n (%)0.0160.0030.0640.898
White1435 (82.5)206 (84.1)72 (82.6)
Black168 (9.7)9 (3.7)10 (11.2)
American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian/Pacific Islander111 (6.4)25 (10.2)7 (7.9)
Unknown26 (1.5)5 (2.0)0
Tumor multifocality, n (%)< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
No1428 (82.1)173 (70.6)51 (57.3)
Yes268 (15.4)58 (23.7)25 (28.1)
Unspecified44 (2.5)14 (5.7)13 (14.6)
Tumor extension, n (%)< 0.001< 0.0010.023< 0.001
Intrathyroidal1700 (97.7)49 (20.0)19 (21.3)
Extrathyroidal40 (2.3)195 (79.6)66 (74.2)
Unspecified01 (0.4)4 (4.5)
T-stage, n (%)< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
T1467 (26.8)16 (6.5)3 (3.4)
T2678 (39.0)21 (8.6)8 (9.0)
T3526 (30.2)164 (66.9)18 (20.2)
T41 (0.1)42 (17.1)54 (60.7)
Unspecified68 (3.9)2 (0.8)6 (6.7)
N-stage, n (%)< 0.001< 0.0010.023< 0.001
N01703 (97.9)153 (62.4)52 (58.4)
N1085 (34.7)28 (31.5)
Unspecified37 (2.1)7 (2.9)9 (10.1)
M-stage, n (%)< 0.0010.167< 0.001< 0.001
M01718 (98.7)240 (98.0)30 (33.7)
M10059 (66.3)
Unspecified22 (1.3)5 (2.0)0

SEER Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results. Pa, local stage vs. regional stage; Pb, regional stage vs. distant stage; Pc, local stage vs. distant stage

Patients with different SEER stages SEER Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results. Pa, local stage vs. regional stage; Pb, regional stage vs. distant stage; Pc, local stage vs. distant stage

Comparison of patients with different surgical procedures

A total of 2051 patients were surgically managed, including 1669 (79.44%) cases of total thyroidectomy and 382 (18.18%) cases of partial thyroidectomy (Table 3). Among the patients undergoing total thyroidectomy, 61.8% were married, versus 54.5% of married patients in the partial thyroidectomy group (P = 0.027). There were significantly more patients with T3, T4, N1, and M1 stages in the total thyroidectomy group than in the partial thyroidectomy group.
Table 3

Patients with different surgical procedures

CharacteristicsTotal thyroidectomy (n = 1669)Partial thyroidectomy (n = 382)P-value
Age55 ± 15.055 ± 16.50.136
Gender, (%)0.556
 Male484 (29.0)105 (27.5)
 Female1185 (71.0)277 (72.5)
Race, n (%)0.667
 White1387 (83.1)309 (80.9)
 Black148 (8.9)36 (9.4)
 American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian/Pacific Islander113 (6.8)30 (7.9)
 Unknown21 (1.3)7 (1.8)
SEER stage, n (%)0.023
 Local1388 (83.2)340 (89.0)
 Regional208 (12.5)35 (9.2)
 Distant68 (4.1)6 (1.6)
 Unspecified5 (0.3)1 (0.3)
Tumor multifocality, n (%)0.072
 No1324 (79.3)317 (83.0)
 Yes295 (17.7)50 (13.1)
 Unspecified50 (3.0)15 (3.9)
Tumor extension, n (%)0.394
 Intrathyroidal1420 (85.1)335 (87.7)
 Extrathyroidal241 (14.4)46 (12.0)
 Unspecified8 (0.5)1 (0.3)
T-stage, n (%)0.022
 T1391 (23.4)93 (24.3)
 T2566 (33.9)137 (35.9)
 T3577 (34.6)122 (31.9)
 T480 (4.8)8 (2.1)
 Unspecified55 (3.3)22 (5.8)
N-stage, n (%)< 0.001
 N01535 (92.0)361 (94.5)
 N199 (5.9)6 (1.6)
 Unspecified35 (2.1)15 (3.9)
M-stage, n (%)0.005
 M01605 (96.2)368 (96.3)
 M144 (2.6)3 (0.8)
 Unspecified20 (1.2)11 (2.9)
Radiotherapy, n (%)< 0.001
 No557 (33.4)262 (68.6)
 Radioactive iodine1033 (61.9)111 (29.1)
 Unspecified79 (4.7)9 (2.4)

SEER: Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results

Patients with different surgical procedures SEER: Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results

Patient survival

The 5-year and 10-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 95.4 and 92.6%, respectively. Univariate survival analysis showed that age > 45 years, late SEER stage, tumor extension, lymph node metastasis, and late TNM stage were associated with poor prognosis (all P < 0.05). Female patients and surgically treated patients had significantly longer survival time (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis was used to identify the independent prognostic factors. The CSS was 134.36 ± 1.71 months for patients over 45 years of age, and 141.59 ± 1.23 months for patients under 45 years of age, suggesting that age ≥ 45 was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.595, 95% confidence interval: 1.415–9.131). In addition, regional disease, distant disease, T3 stage, and T4 stage were also independent prognostic factors (HR > 1) (Table 4).
Table 4

Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses of clinical features for cancer-related survival rates

FeaturesUnivariateMultivariate
HR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
Gender
 Male11
 Female0.415 (0.278–0.619)< 0.0010.614 (0.409–0.924)0.019
Age (year)
  < 4511
  ≥ 456.354 (2.582–15.635)< 0.0014.204 (1.695–10.432)0.002
Race
 White1
 Black0.960 (0.465–1.984)0.913
 Other0.646 (0.237–1.761)0.393
SEER stage
 Local11
 Regional8.454 (4.823–14.817)< 0.0018.015 (4.555–14.101)< 0.001
 Distant61.625 (3.772–31.568)< 0.00146.219 (27.108–78.804)< 0.001
Tumor multifocality
 No1
 Yes1.334 (0.808–2.202)0.260
Tumor extension
 Intrathyroidal1
 Extrathyroidal12.342 (8.062–18.892)< 0.001
Lymph node examination
 Not examined1
 Negative1.060 (0.646–1.741)0.817
 Positive6.029 (3.494–10.403)< 0.001
T-stage
 T11
 T20.701 (0.226–2.173)0.538
 T34.866 (2.060–11.496)< 0.001
 T442.305 (17.874–100.132)< 0.001
N-stage
 N01
 N18.863 (5.561–14.124)< 0.001
M-stage
 M01
 M132.934 (21.214–51.129)< 0.001
Surgery
 No11
 Total thyroidectomy0.085 (0.044–0.166)< 0.0010.335 (0.152–0.741)0.007
 Partial thyroidectomy0.046 (0.019–0.114)< 0.0010.266 (0.096–0.742)0.011
Radiotherapy
 No1
 Yes0.606 (0.405–0.905)0.014

CI confidence interval, SEER Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results

Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses of clinical features for cancer-related survival rates CI confidence interval, SEER Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to describe the survival of different groups. Figure 1a shows the CSS of all HCC patients. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 96.53 and 94.77% for female patients, and 92.61 and 86.88% for male patients (Fig. 1b). The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 98.85 and 98.48% for patients under 45 years of age, and 94.28 and 90.51% for patients over 45 years of age (Fig. 1c). The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 98.6 and 97.6% for patients with local disease, and 90.8 and 81.7% for patients with regional disease. However, the 5-year and 10-year survival rates were only 46.0 and 26.0% for patients with distant disease (Fig. 1d). The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 95.6 and 92.7% for patients with negative lymph nodes, which was significantly higher than the 84.9 and 65.3% for those with positive lymph nodes (Fig. 1e). The 10-year survival rates of T1 and T2 stage patients were 97.57 and 98.13%. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates of T3 stage patients was 94.23 and 90.93%, respectively, which were significantly higher than the 5-year and 10-year survival rates of 59.78 and 46.45% for the T4 patients (Fig. 1f). There was no significant difference in 10-year survival rate between patients treated with total thyroidectomy and those treated with partial thyroidectomy (92.6% vs. 95.6%, P = 0.078). The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 61.6 and 46.2% for non-surgically managed patients (Fig. 1g). The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 96.28 and 93.86% for patients treated with RAI, and 94.18 and 90.78% for patients without RAI (Fig. 1h).
Fig. 1

Survival analysis. (a) Cancer-specific survival of the patients. (b) Cancer-specific survival of patients under and over 45 years of age (P = 0.007). (c) Cancer-specific survival of patients with different SEER stages (P < 0.001). (d) Cancer-specific survival of patients with different lymph node status (P < 0.001). (e) Cancer-specific survival of patients with different T stages (P < 0.001). (F) Cancer-specific survival of surgically and non-surgically managed patients (P < 0.001)

Survival analysis. (a) Cancer-specific survival of the patients. (b) Cancer-specific survival of patients under and over 45 years of age (P = 0.007). (c) Cancer-specific survival of patients with different SEER stages (P < 0.001). (d) Cancer-specific survival of patients with different lymph node status (P < 0.001). (e) Cancer-specific survival of patients with different T stages (P < 0.001). (F) Cancer-specific survival of surgically and non-surgically managed patients (P < 0.001)

Discussion

Our study analyzed the basic characteristics, treatment methods, and survival of patients with HCC. From 2000 to 2015, 86 patients with thyroid Hurthle cell tumors were treated at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital, of which only 5 patients were diagnosed with thyroid HCC. Most literatures on HCC are case reports rather than clinical studies with large samples. Moreover, diagnosis of HCC relies on postoperative pathology. HCC is also characterized by multifocality with high risk of lymph node metastases and distant metastases [7]. Approximately 10–20% of patients have metastases when diagnosed with HCC. Up to 37% of extrathyroidal extension HCC metastasizes to the cervical lymph nodes [8]. There is still no consensus on the optimal treatment method for HCC, and the postoperative effect of radioactive iodine treatment is unclear. The SEER database has been utilized to find the differences between HCC and other thyroid cancers [9-11]. Compared to other differentiated thyroid cancers, HCC is more aggressive with higher risk of distant metastasis and poor prognosis. For the first time, our study used the data of 2101 patients in the SEER database from 2004 to 2015 to describe the clinical characteristics of HCC patients and identify the prognostic factors of CSS. HCC is more common in women with a male to female ratio of approximately 1:2 to 1:4 [1], which is similar to our result of the ratio of male to female of 1:2.47. The first symptoms of HCC patients may include thyroid nodules or cervical lymphadenectasis. The SEER staging plays an important role in the treatment and prognosis of HCC. Therefore, our study also analyzed the relationship between the HCC clinical characteristics and SEER staging. The SEER staging integrates clinical and pathological data to provide accurate evaluation of the degree of disease. Our study found that older age, male sex, multifocal tumors, and extensive tumors were risk factors of late SEER stages. These results suggest that HCC has similar characteristics with other differentiated thyroid carcinomas. Surgery is still the most effective treatment for HCC [10, 12]. Our study found no significant difference in CSS between patients treated with total thyroidectomy and those treated with partial thyroidectomy. This result suggests that the cancer-specific prognosis of HCC is not greatly affected by surgical methods. We speculate that partial thyroidectomy is sufficient for single, small tumors without extrathyroidal invasion. Compared with total thyroidectomy, partial thyroidectomy has fewer complications and less intraoperative injury, but has comparable survival time. Radioactive iodine (RAI) is widely used for the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer, especially papilla thyroid carcinoma. However, HCC is insensitive to RAI due to the low iodine uptake rate. Despite this, RAI is used in some patients after total thyroidectomy [13]. The multivariate Cox analysis found that RAI treatment did not significantly improve the prognosis of HCC. However, the univariate Cox analysis showed that HCC patients can benefit from RAI treatment, which is consistent with previous findings [12]. HCC is associated with a higher metastasis rate and a lower survival rate compared to other differentiated thyroid cancers [14]. HCC with distant metastases has a 5-year mortality rate of up to 80% [15]. Age, tumor size, and sex are prognostic factors of HCC, and tumor extension and recurrence often indicate poor prognosis and increased mortality [16]. The reported 5-year and 10-year survival rates for nonmetastatic HCC are 85.1 and 71.1%, respectively [17]. In our study, the 5-year and 10-year CSS rate for HCC were 95.4 and 92.6%, respectively. The higher survival rates in our study may be explained by the advancement in diagnosis and treatment of HCC in the last decade. Our study has limitations. First, a small portion of the included patients had no data of race or tumor characteristics. For example, 80.2% of the patients had unclear tumor grades, and 2–5% had unclear TNM stages. Therefore, the SEER stage was adopted to describe the disease progression rather than the TNM stage. Second, the tumor grade data was excluded from the analysis due to incomplete information. Third, the SEER database has no detailed information on tumor multifocality, tumor extension, and completion thyroidectomy.

Conclusions

The SEER stage is an independent prognostic factor for HCC, and distant disease is associated with significantly poor prognosis. Age over 45 years, distant SEER stage, and late T-stage are independent risk factors for mortality in HCC. There was no significant difference in survival between patients treated with partial thyroidectomy and those treated with total thyroidectomy. RAI treatment may possibly improve patient survival after thyroidectomy.
  15 in total

1.  Hürthle cell carcinoma: a critical histopathologic appraisal.

Authors:  A Stojadinovic; R A Ghossein; A Hoos; M J Urist; R H Spiro; J P Shah; M F Brennan; A R Shaha; B Singh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Hurthle cell carcinoma: an update on survival over the last 35 years.

Authors:  Sapna Nagar; Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Edwin L Kaplan; Peter Angelos; Raymon H Grogan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Management of follicular and Hürthle cell neoplasms of the thyroid gland.

Authors:  C R McHenry; B A Sandoval
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.495

4.  Histological patterns of locoregional recurrence in Hürthle cell carcinoma of the thyroid gland.

Authors:  Justin A Bishop; Gaosong Wu; Ralph P Tufano; William H Westra
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 6.568

5.  Prognostic factors in patients with Hürthle cell neoplasms of the thyroid.

Authors:  Luis Lopez-Penabad; Alice C Chiu; Ana O Hoff; Pamela Schultz; Sonia Gaztambide; Nelson G Ordoñez; Steven I Sherman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Survival and prognosis in Hürthle cell carcinoma of the thyroid gland.

Authors:  Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-02

7.  Prognostic factors of recurrence in encapsulated Hurthle cell carcinoma of the thyroid gland: a clinicopathologic study of 50 cases.

Authors:  Ronald A Ghossein; David H Hiltzik; Diane L Carlson; Snehal Patel; Ashok Shaha; Jatin P Shah; Robert M Tuttle; Bhuvanesh Singh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Age and tumor size predicts lymph node involvement in Hürthle Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Marlon A Guerrero; Insoo Suh; Menno R Vriens; Wen T Shen; Jessica Gosnell; Electron Kebebew; Quan-Yang Duh; Orlo H Clark
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Follicular Hurthle cell tumors of the thyroid gland.

Authors:  M L Carcangiu; S Bianchi; D Savino; I M Voynick; J Rosai
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Hürthle cell carcinoma: diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Mohamed R Hanief; Laszlo Igali; Dimitrie Grama
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cutaneous thyroid carcinoma sixteen years after benign total thyroidectomy: a unique case.

Authors:  D Klonaris; T Kefalogianni; E Karakostas; G Mastorakis; G Lagoudianakis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for Hürthle cell thyroid carcinoma: a SEER-based study.

Authors:  Cong Shen; Yunzhe Zhao; Xiangyuan Qiu; Peng Li; Ying Ding; Wenlong Wang; Botao Sun; Xinying Li; Wei Jiang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-03

Review 3.  Genetics of Familial Non-Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma (FNMTC).

Authors:  Chiara Diquigiovanni; Elena Bonora
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Oncocytic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma and Oncocytic Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Clinical Features, Uptake, and Response to Radioactive Iodine Therapy, and Outcome.

Authors:  Jelena Lukovic; Irina Petrovic; Zijin Liu; Susan M Armstrong; James D Brierley; Richard Tsang; Jesse D Pasternak; Karen Gomez-Hernandez; Amy Liu; Sylvia L Asa; Ozgur Mete
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Quantitative classification and radiomics of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in indeterminate thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Elizabeth J de Koster; Wyanne A Noortman; Jacob M Mostert; Jan Booij; Catherine B Brouwer; Bart de Keizer; John M H de Klerk; Wim J G Oyen; Floris H P van Velden; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Dennis Vriens
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  FDG-PET/CT in indeterminate thyroid nodules: cost-utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth J de Koster; Dennis Vriens; Maarten O van Aken; Lioe-Ting Dijkhorst-Oei; Wim J G Oyen; Robin P Peeters; Abbey Schepers; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Wilbert B van den Hout
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Clinicopathological features, risk and survival in lung cancer survivors with therapy-related acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Huabin Wang; Yin Yin; Ru Wang; Junbin Huang; Hongman Xue; Yucai Cheng; Lidan Zhang; Chun Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.