| Literature DB >> 32397968 |
Mebrate Dufera1, Regea Dabsu2, Gemechu Tiruneh2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although much progress has been made in reducing malaria morbidity and mortality worldwide in the last decade, nationally malaria remains the third leading cause of death and still considered a major public health problem. Therefore, this study was aimed to assess malaria as a public health problem in and around the sugar cane plantation area of Arjo Didhessa sugar factory, Western Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Arjo Didhessa; Malaria; Malaria risk factors
Year: 2020 PMID: 32397968 PMCID: PMC7216706 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08784-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Characteristics of socio-demographic, socio-economic and housing condition of study participants living in and around Arjo Didhessa sugar cane plantation area (May–November, 2017)
| Variables ( | Category | Frequency n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 307 (67.9%) |
| Female | 145 (32.1%) | |
| Age | Age less than 15 years | 32 (7.1%) |
| Age 15–30 years | 313 (69.2%) | |
| Age greater than 30 years | 107 (23.7%) | |
| Occupation | Daily laborer | 208 (46.0%) |
| Farmer | 117 (25.9%) | |
| Government employee | 83 (18.4%) | |
| Othersa | 44 (9.7%) | |
| Educational Status | No formal education/read &write only | 166 (36.7%) |
| Primary education | 165 (36.5%) | |
| Secondary education | 70 (15.5%) | |
| Tertiary education | 51 (11.3%) | |
| Marital Status | Single | 234 (51.8%) |
| Married | 218 (48.2%) | |
| Duration In The Village | Stay <= five years | 316 (69.9%) |
| Stay more than 5 years | 136 (30.1%) | |
| Study clusters | Abote Didhessa | 132 (29.2%) |
| Command 2 | 74 (16.4%) | |
| Command 5 | 90 (19.9%) | |
| Command 8 | 64 (14.2%) | |
| Main camp | 92 (20.4%) | |
| Housing Unit | Conventional | 268 (59.3%) |
| Improved | 42 (9.3%) | |
| Othersb | 142 (31.4%) |
Keys a Students, housewives, merchants
b Housing units made walls of iron bars
Prevalence of malaria among study participants living in and around Arjo Didhessa sugar cane plantation area (May–November, 2017)
| Variables ( | Category | Number of surveyed participants | Number of malaria parasite detected per category | Prevalence of malaria per category (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 307 | 13 | 4.23% | |
| Female | 145 | 1 | 0.68% | |
| Age less than 15 years | 313 | 10 | 3.2% | |
| Age 15–30 years | 107 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| Age greater than 30 years | 32 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| Daily laborer | 208 | 5 | 2.40% | |
| Farmer | 117 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| Government employee | 83 | 3 | 3.61% | |
| Othersa | 44 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| Single | 234 | 8 | 3.42% | |
| Married | 218 | 6 | 2.75% | |
| Stay <= five years | 316 | 8 | 2.53% | |
| Stay more than 5 years | 136 | 6 | 4.41% | |
| Abote Didhessa | 132 | 6 | 4.5% | |
| Command 2 | 74 | 3 | 4.05% | |
| Command 5 | 90 | 1 | 1.1% | |
| Command 8 | 64 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| Main camp | 92 | 3 | 3.26% | |
| Conventional | 268 | 14 | 5.2% | |
| Improved | 42 | 0 | 0% | |
| Others | 142 | 0 | 0% | |
| 452 | 8 | 1.8% | ||
| 452 | 6 | 1.3% | ||
| Total malaria parasite | 452 | 14 | 3.1%b |
Key aStudents, housewives, merchants
bOverall prevalence of malaria
Factors associated with malaria prevalence among study participants living in and around Arjo-Didhessa sugar cane plantation area (May–November, 2017)
| Variables | Category | Crude Odds ratio | Adjusted Odds ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | referent | referent | |||
| Female | 6.4 (0.8–49) | 0.076 | |||
| yes | 2.9 (0.8–9.5) | 0.080 | |||
| no | referent | referent | |||
| yes | 20.8 (6.2–68.9) | < 0.001 | 77 (8–78.9) | 0.005^ | |
| no | referent | referent | |||
| yes | 3.138 (0.8–11) | 0.082 | |||
| no | referent | ||||
| yes | 17 (4.5–60) | ||||
| no | referent | 0.01 | referent | ||
| yes | 4.18 (0.8–21.5) | 0.087 | |||
| no | referent | referent | |||
| yes | Referent | ||||
| no | 4 (1.2–13.3) | 0.025 | |||
| yes | Referent | referent | |||
| no | 22 (7–70) | < 0.001 | 11 (2–65) | 0.005^ | |
| All | Referent | referent | |||
| Fathers and mothers | 1.5 (0.18–12) | 0.12 | |||
| children | 11.5 (2–63.5) | 0.005 | |||
| Yes | Referent | referent | |||
| No | 5.84 (1.9–17.2) | 0.001 | 14 (1.3–15.8) | 0.026^ |
Key ^ statistically significant variables at p-value =0.05 < 0.05
Annual malaria trend case proportion in and around Arjo Didhessa sugar cane plantation area (2013–2017)
| Year | Total patients visited OPD | Case proportion No (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed ( | Total (% trend prevalence) | ||||
| 2013 | 4234 | 235 (5.55) | 307 (7.25) | 44 (1.04) | 586 (13.84) |
| 2014 | 11,234 | 260 (2.31) | 1081 (9.62) | 61 (0.54) | 1402 (12.48) |
| 2015 | 15,318 | 200 (1.31) | 1317 (8.6) | 100 (0.65) | 1617 (10.56) |
| 2016 | 16,928 | 44 (0.26) | 287 (1.7) | 10 (0.06) | 341 (2.01) |
| 2017 | 17,561 | 37 (0.21) | 178 (1.012) | 3 (0.02) | 218 (1.24) |
| Total | 65,275 | 776 (1.19) | 3170 (4.85) | 218 (0.33) | 4164 (6.38) |
Fig. 1The five years analyses of malaria trend; Malaria case proportion based on month and year in and around Arjo Didhessa sugar cane plantation area (2013–2017)
Fig. 2The five years analyses of malaria trend; Mean monthly malaria case proportion by sex in and around Arjo Didhessa sugar cane plantation area (2013–2017)