| Literature DB >> 32397121 |
Xiaoshuan Zhang1, Xuepei Wang1, Shaohua Xing2, Yunfei Ma1, Xiang Wang1.
Abstract
The market demand for fresh sweet cherries in China has experienced continuous growth due to its rich nutritional value and unique taste. Nonetheless, the characteristics of fruits, transportation conditions and uneven distribution pose a huge obstacle in keeping high quality, especially in express logistics. This paper proposes dynamic monitoring and quality assessment system (DMQAS) to reduce the quality loss of sweet cherries in express logistics. The DMQAS was tested and evaluated in three typical express logistics scenarios with "Meizao" sweet cherries. The results showed that DMQAS could monitor the changes of critical micro-environmental parameters (temperature, relative humidity, O2, CO2 and C2H4) during the express logistics, and the freshness prediction model showed high accuracy (the relative error was controlled within 10%). The proposed DMQAS could provide complete and accurate microenvironment data and can be used to further improve the quality and safety management of sweet cherries during express logistics.Entities:
Keywords: dynamic monitoring; express logistics; freshness prediction; multi-sensors; quality assessment; sweet cherries
Year: 2020 PMID: 32397121 PMCID: PMC7278863 DOI: 10.3390/foods9050602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1The framework and logical relationships of the dynamic monitoring and quality assessment system (DMQAS).
Figure 2The physical architecture of the control platform based on single chip microcomputer.
The calibration data and error analysis of gas sensors.
| Type | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Max Error | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O2 sensor (%vol) | Sv | 0 | 20.9 | 25 | - | - | 0.08% |
| Mv | 0.00 | 20.89 | 25.02 | - | - | ||
| Ov | 0.4 | 1.732 | 2.005 | - | - | ||
| CO2 sensor (%vol) | Sv | 0 | 0.040 | 5.000 | 7.500 | 10.000 | 0.0132% |
| Mv | 0.00 | 0.041 | 4.996 | 7.599 | 9.998 | ||
| Ov | 0.4 | 0.407 | 1.201 | 1.600 | 2.000 | ||
| C2H4 sensor (%vol) | Sv | 0 | 19.6 | 49.5 | 99.2 | - | 1.01% |
| Mv | 0.00 | 19.8 | 49.9 | 99.9 | - | ||
| Ov | 0.399 | 0.723 | 1.194 | 1.996 | - | ||
Notes: Sv: standard values (%vol); Mv: measured values (%vol); Ov: output values (V).
Figure 3The static calibration curve and analyses of gas sensors. (a) CO2 snsor calibration curve; (b) C2H4 snsor calibration curve; (c) O2 snsor calibration curve.
Figure 4The processing flow of multi-sensors signal acquisition.
Figure 5The conceptual structure of freshness prediction model based on back propagation (BP) neural network.
Comparison of training results of different numbers of hidden layers.
| Hidden Layers | Epoch | MSE | Hidden Layers | Epoch | MSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 101 | 1.30 × 10−3 | 8 | 145 | 9.96 × 10−4 |
| 4 | 25 | 3.48 × 10−3 | 9 | 80 | 1.00 × 10−3 |
| 5 | 115 | 9.94 × 10−4 | 10 | 87 | 9.92 × 10−4 |
| 6 | 247 | 1.02 × 10−3 | 11 | 168 | 9.98 × 10−4 |
| 7 | 165 | 9.96 × 10−4 | 12 | 116 | 9.99 × 10−4 |
Figure 6Structure and performance of the prediction model based on BP neural network. (a) The best validation performance at 87epochs; (b) the gradient and validation fail at 87 epochs; (c) the fit of the output value and target.
Figure 7Simulation experiment of sweet cherries in express logistics transportation. (a) ambient temperature group; (b) ice-added group; (c) pre-cooling group.
Specifications of quality indicators measurement devices.
| No. | Quality Indicator | Device | Operating Environment | Accuracy | Measurement/Display Range | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chromatic aberration | KONICA MINOLTA CR-400 | T: 0–40 °C | - | Y: 0.01–160.00% | Standard deviation |
| 2 | Hardness | FHT-05 | T: 0–45 °C | ±0.01 kg f | 0.2–5.0 kg f | Probe insertion depth: 10 mm |
| 3 | pH | Testo 205 | T: −20–70 °C | ±0.02 pH | 0–14 pH | - |
| 4 | Soluble Solid Content | ATAGO PAL-1 | T: 10–40 °C | ±0.2% Brix | 0.0–53.0% | - |
Figure 8The typical business flow of the sweet cherries industry.
Business flow analysis of sweet cherries based on hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP).
| Stage | Critical Control Point (CCP) | Hazard Analysis (HA) | Stakeholders | Control Measures |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvesting | Pests and diseases, immature, decay, pesticide residue. | Farmers, picking staff | The picking process should be standardized to avoid harvesting substandard sweet cherries. |
| 2 | Sorting, grading, packaging | Non-standard sorting and grading methods, poor operating environment, unreasonable packaging | Farmers, workers | The standardized sorting and grading methods should be adopted, clean and hygienic working environment should be guaranteed. |
| 3 | Pre-cooling | No complete pre-cooling, cross-infection. | Cold storage management staff | The complete pre-cooling and clean pre-cooling environment should be ensured. |
| 4 | Short-distance transportation | Transportation factors such as packaging, vibration, temperature, etc. | Transport personnel | The suitable packaging method and temperature control measures could be provided, violent vibration should be avoided. |
| 5 | Express transportation | Unsuitable storage and transportation, unstandardized operations, lack of process management | Express companies | Reasonable storage and transportation condition should be provided, standardized operations and process management should also be emphasized. |
| 6 | Long-distance transportation | The freight density, transportation condition, haulage time. | Transport personnel | Reasonable loading density, critical microenvironment, transportation time should be taken into consideration. |
| 7 | Sales or Display | Improper temperature or relative humidity control cause browning or rotting. | Supermarket Salesman Saleswomen | The sales or display environment should be controlled in a suitable range. |
Figure 9Mechanism of Quality Change of Sweet Cherries in the Express Logistics.
Figure 10Changes of temperature and relative humidity in express logistics. (a) Ambient temperature group; (b) Ice-added group; (c) Pre-cooling group; (d) Contrast diagram.
Comparison analysis of the predicted and actual freshness.
| Freshness (day) | Group Ⅰ | Group Ⅱ | Group Ⅲ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictive Value | Absolute Error | Relative Error | Predictive Value | Absolute Error | Relative Error | Predictive Value | Absolute Error | Relative Error | |
| 2.499 | 2.334 | −0.165 | −0.066 | 2.461 | −0.038 | −0.015 | 2.502 | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| 2.549 | 2.471 | −0.078 | −0.031 | 2.393 | −0.156 | −0.061 | 2.585 | 0.036 | 0.014 |
| 2.599 | 2.589 | −0.010 | −0.004 | 2.445 | −0.154 | −0.059 | 2.616 | 0.017 | 0.007 |
| 2.649 | 2.726 | 0.077 | 0.029 | 2.463 | −0.186 | −0.070 | 2.589 | −0.060 | −0.023 |
| 2.699 | 2.589 | −0.110 | −0.041 | 2.445 | −0.254 | −0.094 | 2.616 | −0.083 | −0.031 |
| 2.749 | 3.002 | 0.253 | 0.092 | 2.579 | −0.170 | −0.062 | 2.947 | 0.198 | 0.072 |
| 2.799 | 3.072 | 0.273 | 0.098 | 2.585 | −0.214 | −0.076 | 2.933 | 0.134 | 0.048 |
The details of the change of temperature and relative humidity.
| Groups | Temperature | Relative Humidity | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Value (°C) | Minimum Value (°C) | Mean (°C) | Maximum Rate (°C /min) | Maximum Value (%) | Minimum Value (%) | Mean (%) | Maximum Rate (%/min) | |
| Ⅰ | 27.80 | 21.80 | 24.80 | 0.05 | 93.20 | 74.00 | 83.60 | 6.02 |
| Ⅱ | 27.70 | 16.70 | 22.20 | 0.56 | 96.60 | 60.80 | 78.70 | 4.78 |
| Ⅲ | 27.10 | 9.90 | 18.50 | 0.89 | 97.20 | 57.60 | 77.40 | 7.90 |
Figure 11Changes of the microenvironment gas content in the express transportation. Note: I represents the ambient temperature group; II represents the ice-added group; III represents the pre-cooling group. (a–c) three different express transportation modes.
Figure 12Changes of quality indicators of sweet cherries in express logistics.
Evaluation and analysis of the DMQAS.
| System Performance Indicators | Multi-Sensors Micro-Environmental Monitoring | Freshness Prediction | Range/Accuracy of the DMQAS | Response of the DMQAS | Quality Control | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature and Relative Humidity Monitoring | O2 Sensor | CO2 Sensor | C2H4 Sensor | Temperature and Relative Humidity Monitoring | O2 Sensor | CO2 Sensor | C2H4 Sensor | Quality Loss | Market Price (RMB) | |||
| Traditional work | Temperature, relative humidity | None | Range (T): −40–120 °C Range (RH): 0–99% Accuracy (T): ±1 °C Accuracy (RH): ±0.5% | None | None | None | Response (T): <10 s Recovery (T): <20 s Response (RH): <8 s Recovery (RH): <60 s | None | None | None | 25–30% | <40 yuan/kg |
| Dynamic Monitoring and Quality Assessment System (DMQAS) | Temperature, relative humidity, O2, CO2, C2H4. | Relative error <10% | Range (T): −40–80 °C Range (RH): 0–99% Accuracy (T): ±0.5 °C Accuracy (RH): ±0.1% | Range: 0–25%vol Accuracy: ±0.1%vol | Range: 0–10%vol Accuracy: ±0.01%vol | Range: 0–100 ppm Accuracy: ±0.1 ppm | Response (T): <6 s Recovery (T): <20 s Response (RH): <5 s Recovery (RH): <60 s | Response: <20 s Recovery: <60 s | Response: <30 s Recovery: <30 s | Response: <30 s Recovery: <60 s | <15% | >60 yuan/kg |
| Advantages | More comprehensive critical micro-environmental parameters could be monitored. | The freshness of sweet cherries could be predicted in DMQAS. | Better accuracy of temperature, relative humidity, O2, CO2, and C2H4 monitoring. | The faster response and shorter recovery time could be achieved in DMQAS. | Less quality loss and higher market price. | |||||||