Literature DB >> 32397102

The Relationship between ECOG-PS, mGPS, BMI/WL Grade and Body Composition and Physical Function in Patients with Advanced Cancer.

Ross D Dolan1, Louise E Daly2, Claribel Pl Simmons3, Aoife M Ryan2, Wei Mj Sim1, Marie Fallon3, Derek G Power2, Andrew Wilcock4, Matthew Maddocks5, Michael I Bennett6, Caroline Usborne7, Barry J Laird3, Donald C McMillan1.   

Abstract

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide and the associated reduction in physical function has a marked impact on both quality of life and survival. The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance status (ECOG-PS), modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), Body Mass Index/ Weight Loss grade (BMI/WL grade), and Computerised Tomography (CT)-derived body composition measurement and physical function in patients with advanced cancer. Nine sites contributed prospective data on patient demographics, ECOG-PS, mGPS, physical function tests, and CT-derived body composition. Categorical variables were analysed using χ2 test for linear-by-linear association, or χ2 test for 2-by-2 tables. Associations were analysed using binary logistic regression. A total of 523 cancer patients (266 males, 257 females) were included in the final analysis and most had metastatic disease (83.2%). The median overall survival was 5.6 months. On multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, a high ECOG-PS remained independently associated with a low skeletal muscle index (p < 0.001), low skeletal muscle density (p < 0.05), and timed up and go test failure (p < 0.001). A high mGPS remained independently associated with a low skeletal muscle density (p < 0.05) and hand grip strength test failure (p < 0.01). A high BMI/WL grade remained independently associated with a low subcutaneous fat index (p < 0.05), low visceral obesity (p < 0.01), and low skeletal muscle density (p < 0.05). In conclusion, a high ECOG-PS and a high mGPS as outlined in the ECOG-PS/mGPS framework were consistently associated with poorer body composition and physical function in patients with advanced cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECOG; Glasgow prognostic score; advanced cancer; body composition; computed tomography; physical function testing; systemic inflammation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32397102      PMCID: PMC7281405          DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  45 in total

1.  Prognosis in advanced lung cancer--A prospective study examining key clinicopathological factors.

Authors:  Claribel P Simmons; Filippos Koinis; Marie T Fallon; Kenneth C Fearon; Jo Bowden; Tora S Solheim; Bjorn Henning Gronberg; Donald C McMillan; Ioannis Gioulbasanis; Barry J Laird
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  Reference values for the timed up and go test: a descriptive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard W Bohannon
Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.381

3.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  M M Oken; R H Creech; D C Tormey; J Horton; T E Davis; E T McFadden; P P Carbone
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 4.  Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus.

Authors:  Kenneth Fearon; Florian Strasser; Stefan D Anker; Ingvar Bosaeus; Eduardo Bruera; Robin L Fainsinger; Aminah Jatoi; Charles Loprinzi; Neil MacDonald; Giovanni Mantovani; Mellar Davis; Maurizio Muscaritoli; Faith Ottery; Lukas Radbruch; Paula Ravasco; Declan Walsh; Andrew Wilcock; Stein Kaasa; Vickie E Baracos
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Establishing computed tomography-defined visceral fat area thresholds for use in obesity-related cancer research.

Authors:  Suzanne L Doyle; Anne Marie Bennett; Claire L Donohoe; Ann Marie Mongan; Julia M Howard; Fiona E Lithander; Graham P Pidgeon; John V Reynolds; Joanne Lysaght
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Prognostic factors in patients with advanced cancer: a comparison of clinicopathological factors and the development of an inflammation-based prognostic system.

Authors:  Barry J Laird; Stein Kaasa; Donald C McMillan; Marie T Fallon; Marianne J Hjermstad; Peter Fayers; Pal Klepstad
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  The applicability of a weight loss grading system in cancer cachexia: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Ola Magne Vagnildhaug; David Blum; Andrew Wilcock; Peter Fayers; Florian Strasser; Vickie E Baracos; Marianne J Hjermstad; Stein Kaasa; Barry Laird; Tora S Solheim
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 12.910

8.  Subcutaneous adiposity is an independent predictor of mortality in cancer patients.

Authors:  Maryam Ebadi; Lisa Martin; Sunita Ghosh; Catherine J Field; Richard Lehner; Vickie E Baracos; Vera C Mazurak
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Wearable activity monitors to assess performance status and predict clinical outcomes in advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  Steven Piantadosi; Arvind M Shinde; Gillian Gresham; Andrew E Hendifar; Brennan Spiegel; Elad Neeman; Richard Tuli; B J Rimel; Robert A Figlin; Curtis L Meinert
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2018-07-05

10.  Determinants of quality of life in patients with incurable cancer.

Authors:  Louise E Daly; Ross D Dolan; Derek G Power; Éadaoin Ní Bhuachalla; Wei Sim; Samantha J Cushen; Marie Fallon; Claribel Simmons; Donald C McMillan; Barry J Laird; Aoife M Ryan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  3 in total

1.  Association between CT-Quantified Body Composition and Recurrence, Survival in Nonmetastasis Colorectal Cancer Patients Underwent Regular Chemotherapy after Surgery.

Authors:  Piaopaio Ying; Wenyi Jin; Xiaoli Wu; Weiyang Cai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  A comparison of CT-body composition measurements in non-cancer and cancer patients from a single UK centre.

Authors:  Josh McGovern; Ross D Dolan; Donogh Maguire; Paul G Horgan; Barry J Laird; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls       Date:  2022-09-01

3.  The association between protease inhibitors and anal cancer outcomes in veterans living with HIV treated with definitive chemoradiation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Alison K Yoder; David S Lakomy; Yongquan Dong; Suchismita Raychaudhury; Kathryn Royse; Christine Hartman; Peter Richardson; Donna L White; Jennifer R Kramer; Lilie L Lin; Elizabeth Chiao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.638

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.