| Literature DB >> 32396832 |
Abstract
Although public repository requirements are aimed at researchers and designed to ensure that the utility of the limited data we have is optimized, these policies also have ramifications for research participants. In this opinion article, I discuss how the nature of such repositories can subject participants whose data are 'banked' to unwitting participation in scientific projects they might find objectionable. In addition, concerns about the privacy of banked genomic data are exacerbated by recent projects that demonstrate the ability to re-identify genomic data, raising the specter of discriminatory or oppressive use of this information. These concerns are most likely to discourage participation in research that requires data sharing among those who have experienced these phenomena and are less likely to discount their likelihood.Entities:
Keywords: data sharing; ethics
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32396832 PMCID: PMC7372716 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.03.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Genet ISSN: 0168-9525 Impact factor: 11.639